Reactivity of [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgH and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMe towards Carbonyl Compounds: Access to Terminal Alkoxide and Enolate Complexes
The hydride and methyl compounds [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgH and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMe undergo insertion of the carbonyl moieties of non-enolizable aldehydes and ketones such as PhCHO and Ph 2 CO into the Mg–H and Mg–Me bonds to form alkoxide compounds, namely [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCH 2 Ph, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCHPh 2 , [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMOCH(Me)Ph and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCMePh 2 . In contrast to the insertion of the carbonyl moiety, the reactions of the enolizable ketones Me 2 CO and PhC(O)Me with [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMe afford the enolate complexes, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Me)=CH 2 and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Ph)=CH 2 . The formation of [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Me)=CH 2 is of note because methyl Grignard reagents preferentially react with acetone to form t-butoxide derivatives. The hydride compound, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgH, also reacts with acetone to yield the enolate compound, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Me)=CH 2 , but while the overall transformation is similar to that of the methyl derivative, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMe, the enolate compound is not the initially formed product. Specifically, acetone undergoes preferential insertion into the Mg–H bond to generate the corresponding alkoxide, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOPr i , which subsequently converts to the respective enolate in the presence of excess acetone. Furthermore, the relative ability of the hydride and methyl compounds to undergo insertion of carbonyl compounds into the Mg–H and Mg–Me bonds has been addressed computationally, which indicates that the barrier for insertion of the carbonyl group into the Mg–H bond is lower than that for insertion into the Mg–Me bond. The molecular structures of [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCH 2 Ph, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCHPh 2 , [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCMePh 2 , [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Me)=CH 2 and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Ph)=CH 2 have been determined by X-ray diffraction.