Application of systems theoretic process analysis to a lane keeping assist system
Not Available
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Pasricha, Sudeep.
Not Available
We design resource management heuristics that assign serial tasks to the nodes of a heterogeneous high performance computing (HPC) system. The value of completing these tasks is modeled using monotonically decreasing utility functions that represent the time-varying importance of the task. The value of completing a task is equal to its utility function at the time of its completion. The overall performance of this system is measured using the total utility earned by all tasks during some interval of time. To maximize the performance of such a system where the preemption of tasks is possible, we have designed, analyzed, and compared a set of resource allocation heuristic techniques. We combine two utility-aware heuristics with three different preemption techniques to create six preemption-capable heuristics. We also consider the two utility-aware heuristics without preemption. We use simulation studies to evaluate this set of eight heuristics and compare them with an FCFS heuristic, which is often used in real systems, and random assignments. In general, our set of eight heuristics is able to significantly outperform the comparison heuristics, and the preemption-capable heuristics are able to significantly increase the utility earned compared to the heuristics that do not use preemption. We analyze the performance tradeoffs among the different preemption-capable heuristics under a variety of oversubscribed workload environments.
Multicore processors have become an integral part of modern large-scale and high-performance parallel and distributed computing systems. This advance became necessary as the demand for increased system performance has exceeded the limits that single core processors can provide. Unfortunately, applications co-located on multicore processors can suffer from decreased performance and increased dynamic energy use as a result of access to shared resources, such as memory. Consequently, it is increasingly important to characterize the performance of applications that execute on these architectures. This work investigates some of the disadvantages of co-location, and presents a methodology for building models capable of utilizing varying amounts of information about a target application and its co-located applications to make predictions about the target application’s execution time and the system’s energy use under arbitrary co-locations of a wide range of application types. The proposed methodology is validated on three different server class Intel Xeon multicore processors using eleven applications from two scientific benchmark suites. The model’s utility for scheduling is also demonstrated in a simulated large-scale high-performance computing environment through the creation of a co-location aware scheduling heuristic. This heuristic demonstrates that scheduling using information generated with the proposed modeling methodology is capable of making significant improvements over a scheduling heuristic that is naive to co-location interference.
Abstract: The worth of completing parallel tasks is modeled using utility functions, which monotonically-decrease with time and represent the importance and urgency of a task. These functions define the utility earned by a task at the time of its completion. The performance of such a system is measured as the total utility earned by all completed tasks over some interval of time (e.g., 24 hours). To maximize system performance when scheduling dynamically arriving parallel tasks onto a high performance computing (HPC) system that is oversubscribed and energy-constrained, we have designed, analyzed, and compared different heuristic techniques. Four utility-aware heuristics (i.e., Max Utility, Max Utility-per-Time, Max Utility-per-Resource, and Max Utility-per-Energy), three FCFS-based heuristics (Conservative Backfilling, EASY Backfilling, and FCFS with Multiple Queues), and a Random heuristic were examined in this study. A technique that is often used with the FCFS-based heuristics is the concept of a permanent reservation. We compare the performance of permanent reservations with temporary place-holders to demonstrate the advantages that place-holders can provide. We also present a novel energy filtering technique that constrains the maximum energy-per-resource used by each task. We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of these heuristics and techniques in an energy-constrained oversubscribed HPC environment. With place-holders, energy filtering, and dropping tasks with low potential utility, our utility-aware heuristics are able to significantly outperform the existing FCFS-based techniques.
The need for greater performance in high performance computing systems combined with rising costs of electricity to power these systems motivates the need for energy-efficient resource management. Driven by the requirements of the Extreme Scale Systems Center at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, our study addresses the problem of scheduling dynamically-arriving tasks to machines in an oversubscribed and energy-constrained heterogeneous distributed computing environment. Our goal is to maximize total “utility” earned by the system, where the utility of a task is defined by a monotonically-decreasing function that represents the value of completing that task at different times. To address this problem, we design four energy-aware resource allocation heuristics and compare their performance to heuristics from the literature. For our given energy-constrained environment, we also design an energy filtering technique that helps some heuristics regulate their energy consumption by allowing tasks to only consume up to an estimated fair-share of energy. Extensive sensitivity analyses of the heuristics in environments with different levels of heterogeneity show that heuristics with the ability to balance both energy consumption and utility exhibit the best performance because they save energy for use by future tasks.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.