Engineering topics

Paul H. von Hardenberg

Publications and source records attributed to Paul H. von Hardenberg.

3 records

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Demonstration of Initial GlennICE Relative Frame Capability: Axial-Flow Propeller

Modifications have been implemented in the GlennICE software to accommodate a non-inertial reference frame. GlennICE accepts a flow solution from an external flow solver. It then introduces particles and tracks them through the flow field in a Lagrangian manner. Centrifugal and Coriolis terms were added to the GlennICE software to account for relative frame simulations. The objective of the present paper is twofold. First, to check that the new terms are implemented correctly and that the code still behaves as expected with respect to convergence. And second, to provide some initial insight into an upcoming propeller experiment in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel. The paper presents a description of the code modifications. In addition, results are presented for two operating conditions, and three particle sizes. Each case was simulated with four different grid densities to assess grid dependence.

Aircraft Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Ice Shape Analysis of an eVTOL Propeller in Forward Flight at the NASA Glenn Icing Research Tunnel

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) introduces many novel electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft configurations for which the effect of icing is not well understood. While icing computational tools have often aided in the design and certification of conventional aircraft, experimental data is needed to support the development and validation of such tools for eVTOL applications. To investigate the icing phenomenon relevant to eVTOL aircraft, NASA Glenn Research Center developed a general-purpose propeller test stand for conducting fundamental icing research on electrically driven propellers in the Icing Research Tunnel (IRT). A 10-day test entry in the IRT was completed in March, 2023, with the goal of generating ice accretions on a non-proprietary propeller geometry under well-characterized conditions. Three carbon fiber propellers of diameters 0.610, 0.711, and 0.914 m (24, 28, and 36 in) were used during the test. Various parametric sweeps of cloud and operating conditions were performed to evaluate the sensitivity of the parameters on the resulting ice accretion characteristics such as ice thickness, mass, location (impingement limits), and type (glaze vs rime). Ice shapes were reviewed for their repeatability, correctness of trends, and sensitivity to parameter variations. The data from the test is being used to support the development of the ice accretion solver, GlennICE.

Icing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

GlennICE Simulation of 24, 28 and 36 Inch Diameter eVTOL Propellers in Forward Flight

Flow solutions and water collection results are presented for three different propeller sizes. Flow solutions were generated using the NASA FUN3D software, and water collection was simulated using NASA GlennICE software. The geometries considered represent experimental articles that have been tested in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel. Each configuration has four blades. For the experiment, the same spinner centerbody is used for each propeller size. The different sized blades are similar for radii larger than about 40% of total span. Operating conditions were chosen to match operating points where experimental data was collected. Results are presented for both single bin simulations, as well as 7-bin Langmuir D distributions. For 80 microns MVD the Langmuir D distribution showed small differences compared to the single bin. For 15 microns MVD the Langmuir D distribution had a larger impact, especially on the spinner. In the experiment, the centerbody was unchanged as propeller size was changed. In this paper, additional simulations were completed with the 36 inch case perfectly scaled down to 24 and 28 inch. The perfect geometric scaling allows for an assessment of the effect of constant centerbody size on the results. While slight differences in pressure distribution on the propeller are visible between scaled and non-scaled centerbody, the effect seems quite minimal regarding water collection. All simulations were run very cold to ensure rime ice, since handling runback water in the non-inertial frame is beyond the scope of the present work. Ice shapes were generated using a single time step growth. The total mass on the blade and spinner was generally underpredicted for 15 microns MVD, and overpredicted for 80 microns MVD. When comparing ice shapes at operating conditions the numerical results produce very similar ice shapes.

Aircraft Icing↗