Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Paul Tsao

Publications and source records attributed to Paul Tsao.

GlennICE Manual 4.2.0

This manual is intended to provide the information necessary for an applications engineer to configure, compile, and execute the GlennICE software. The intent of this document is not to detail the algorithms of the software. The intent of this document is to detail how a user can interact and configure the algorithms of this software in order to produce a desired simulation.

GlennICE↗

GlennICE Manual 4.1.0

GlennICE (Glenn Icing Computational Environment) is a computational tool designed to calculate ice growth on complex three-dimensional geometries using the input from a user-supplied computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solution for the geometry of interest. The NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field is developing this tool to aid those evaluating, designing and certifying aircraft, engines, and aircraft components for flight in icing conditions. This domestically available software is being developed to enable the introduction of new icing physics into a computational environment in a manner that is open for evaluation and eventual use by industry, academia, and other government organizations.

Icing↗

Large-Drop Ice Accretion Test Results for a Large Scale Swept Wing Model

In-flight icing is an important consideration that affects aircraft design, performance and safety. Newer regulations combined with increasing demand to reduce fuel burn, emissions and noise are driving a need for improvements in icing simulation capability. To that end, this paper presents the results of ice accretion testing conducted in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel on a large swept wing section typical of a modern commercial transport. The model was based upon a section of the Common Research Model wing at the 64% semispan station with a streamwise chord length of 136 in. The test conditions were developed with an icing scaling analysis to generate similar conditions for a small MVD = 25 μm and a large MVD = 110 μm. A series of tests were conducted over a range of total temperature from -23.8 ˚C to -1.4 ˚C with all other conditions held constant. The results for the small MVD cloud conditions were consistent with previous work and showed the changing ice morphology from rime ice at colder temperatures to highly 3D scallop ice in the range of -8.7 ˚C to -3.8 ˚C. The results for the large MVD cloud conditions exhibited some differences in the ice accretion morphology from the small MVD conditions. Scallop-like ice features were observed at total temperature of -3.8˚C. The large MVD ice accretion at lower temperatures tended to be smoother than the corresponding ice accretion for small MVD. The thickness of the main ice shape tended to be larger for the small MVD conditions compared to the corresponding large MVD ice shape while the latter had more ice farther downstream. The measured ice mass was approximately equal between the corresponding small and large MVD ice shapes up to a freezing fraction of 0.6. For higher freezing fraction, the large MVD ice shapes weighed more. Cloud MVD variation from 50 μm to 230 μm while holding the scaling parameters constant resulted in very minor differences in the ice shapes, mostly in the upper and lower surface chordwise extents. Ice volume was computed from 3D scan data and used to calculate a ratio of ice mass to volume. The resulting values were in the range of 240 to 455 Kg/m3. While this is consistent with analogous values previously reported in the literature, more data are needed to determine a specific trend in this ratio as a function of freezing fraction and the corresponding governing physical phenomena. This work has resulted in a significant experimental database of ice accretion for small and large MVD conditions applicable to large-scale swept wings.

Icing↗

Comparison of Bimodal Ice Shapes on Full-Chord and Hybrid CRM Midspan Models

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of a 65 percent scale size of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Super-cooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each ice accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from monomodal distributions of identical cloud droplet Median Volume Diameter (MVD) were obtained and compared. Results indicated that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions have similar 2D Maximum Combined Cross Section, or MCCS, ice shape around the model leading edge region and equivalent ice mass measurement per unit span to within the IRT SLD cloud calibration uncertainty, as expected with this approach, but the bimodal distributions have distinctly larger ice feathers that extended further back on the chord of the model. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the main ice accretions compared well between the full-chord and hybrid models

Icing , Simulation, Validation↗

Comparison of Bimodal Ice Shapes on Full-Chord and Hybrid CRM Midspan Models

An ice shape database has been created to document ice accretions on a full-chord length and hybrid versions of a 65 percent scale size of the mid-span section of the Common Research Model resulting from an exposure to a Super-cooled Large Drop (SLD) icing cloud with a bimodal drop size distribution. The ice shapes created were documented with photographs, laser scanned surface measurements over a section of the model span, and measurement of the ice mass over the same section of each ice accretion. Drop distribution effects were evaluated by using the same IRT icing conditions except with either monomodal or bimodal drop distributions. Ice shapes resulting from the bimodal distribution as well as from monomodal distributions of identical cloud droplet Median Volume Diameter (MVD) were obtained and compared. Results indicated that the ice shapes resulting from the monomodal and bimodal drop size distributions have similar 2D Maximum Combined Cross Section, or MCCS, ice shape around the model leading edge region and equivalent ice mass measurement per unit span to within the IRT SLD cloud calibration uncertainty, as expected with this approach, but the bimodal distributions have distinctly larger ice feathers that extended further back on the chord of the model. For most test conditions, the overall size and shape of the main ice accretions compared well between the full-chord and hybrid models.

Icing↗

Additional Large-Drop Ice Accretion Test Results for a Large Scale Swept Wing Section from January 2022

In-flight icing is an important consideration that affects aircraft design, performance, certification and safety. Newer regulations combined with increasing demand to reduce fuel burn, emissions and noise are driving a need for improvements in icing simulation capability. To that end, this paper presents the results of additional ice accretion testing conducted in the NASA Icing Research Tunnel in January 2022 with a large swept wing section typical of a modern commercial transport. The model was based upon a section of the Common Research Model wing at the 64% semispan station with a streamwise chord length of 136 in. The test conditions were developed with an icing scaling analysis to generate similar conditions for a small median volumetric diameter (MVD) = 25 μm cloud and a large MVD = 110 μm cloud. A series of tests were conducted over a range of total temperature from -23.8 ˚C to -1.4 ˚C with all other conditions held constant. Another series of tests explored cloud MVD variations from 50 μm to 230 μm while holding constant certain scaling parameters. The variation in ice mass and scanned ice volume across repeat conditions was approximately 50% lower than the uncertainty in the cloud MVD and liquid water content. The measured ice mass and volume calculated from the 3D scans were used to compute the mass to volume ratio that is sometimes referred to as ice density or void fraction. When the ice volume based on the ice shape maximum combined cross section was used to determine this ratio, the resulting values were in the range of 240 to 455 kg/m3. This is consistent with analogous values previously reported in the literature. The ice shape mass and volume increased with MVD from 50 to 230 μm at fixed values of the scaling parameters. The ice mass to volume ratio was approximately constant for all of the cases which showed that the accreted mass and volume increased at approximately the same rate. These results demonstrate the significance of cloud MVD on ice shape mass and volume.

Ice accretion↗