Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Peinado-Guerrero, Miguel

Publications and source records attributed to Peinado-Guerrero, Miguel.

An energy storage dispatch optimization for demand-side management in industrial facilities

An energy storage (ES) dispatch optimization was implemented to test lithium-ion battery ES, supercapacitor ES, and compressed air ES on two different industrial facilities – one intermittent process facility and one continuous process facility. The model first shows the capability of optimizing the size of a single technology on a single industrial facility to maximize the return on investment. Then, for the same profile, the model identifies significant differences in the optimal size for different technologies based on their performance parameters. Third, the model identifies differences in the optimal size for each technology based on the facilities profile. Here the results show compressed air ES yields the highest return on investment for both facilities and provides insight for future development of ES systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Improved Air-Conditioning Demand Response of Connected Communities over Individually Optimized Buildings

Connected communities potentially offer much greater demand response capabilities over singular building energy management systems (BEMS) through an increase of connectivity. The potential increase in benefits from this next step in connectivity is still under investigation, especially when applied to existing buildings. This work utilizes EnergyPlus simulation results on eight different commercial prototype buildings to estimate the potential savings on peak demand and energy costs using a mixed-integer linear programming model. This model is used in two cases: a fully connected community and eight separate buildings with BEMS. The connected community is optimized using all zones as variables, while the individual buildings are optimized separately and then aggregated. These optimization problems are run for a range of individual zone flexibility values. The results indicate that a connected community offered 60.0% and 24.8% more peak demand savings for low and high flexibility scenarios, relative to individually optimized buildings. Energy cost optimization results show only marginally better savings of 2.9% and 6.1% for low and high flexibility, respectively.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗