Comparisons of global aerosol simulations from GOCART and GMI-UMich
Global aerosol mass and optical thickness (AOT) simulated by two aerosol models (GOCART and GMI-UMich) are evaluated and the strengths and shortcomings of the model approaches are investigated. These two offline CTM models are driven by the same meteorological fields (NASA GEOS-4), use the same dynamic transport algorithm, and have the same spatial resolution. However, they differ partially in emission, dry/wet deposition, and chemistry. The simulated aerosol masses are evaluated by the surface long-term measurements and short-term field campaigns (ACE-Asia and TRACE-P). AOT are calculated using modeled aerosol mass but externally mixed for GOCART and partially internally mixed for GMI-Mich. These AOT are evaluated using satellite observations from MODIS and MISR and ground measurements from AERONET. Our work demonstrates that there are significant differences in simulated aerosol mass and AOT by the two approaches. Further investigation will be performed to evaluate each mechanism which induces the differences quantitatively by implementing GOCART-like emission, deposition, and chemistry into GMI framework.