Improvements to Modeling Capabilities of ATF Concepts in the BISON Fuel Performance Code
Research into accident tolerant materials for the fuel and cladding in Light Water Reactors has been at the forefront of the nuclear fuel research community since the events that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011. Accident tolerant materials are defined as those that provide significantly increased response time in the event of an accident while providing similar or improved performance as the conventional UO{sub 2}/zirconium-based cladding fuel rods during normal operation. In particular, qualitative attributes for materials with enhanced accident tolerance include improved reaction (e.g., oxidation) kinetics with steam, resulting in lower hydrogen (or other combustible gases) generation rate, while maintaining acceptable thermo-mechanical properties, fuel-clad interactions, and fission-product behavior. Through it's Office of Nuclear Energy, the United States Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) has accelerated research in this area through the Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC). The goal of the AFC Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) program is to guide selection of promising concepts for insertion into a commercial reactor as part of a lead test rod or assembly in 2022. Given the aggressive development schedule, it is impossible to perform a comprehensive set of experiments to provide material characterization data. Therefore, the AFC is utilizing computational analysis tools in an effort to understand the proposed accident tolerant materials. The two materials of interest in this work are iron-chromium-aluminum (FeCrAl) cladding and U{sub 3}Si{sub 2}. From a fuel performance standpoint, the correlations available to describe the behavior of these two materials is limited. Therefore, as additional experimental data becomes available and correlations are updated, the fuel performance models must be updated as well to assure that the material models reflect the latest experimental findings. In this paper we demonstrate the importance of utilizing the latest state-of-the-art models for fuel performance simulations by comparing the change in the updated thermal conductivity model for U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} fuel and oxidation model for FeCrAl cladding alloys using the BISON fuel performance code under normal operating conditions. The results indicate that the latest thermal conductivity model for U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} results in fuel centerline temperatures that are on average approximately 3% higher than the previous model. For the oxidation behavior of FeCrAl alloys the new model predicts observable but small oxide thickness (6 μm) compared to the previous model which predicted essentially zero oxide scale formation.