Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Permann, Cody J.
Presentation for the Microreactor Program Review on the work package that entitled "Development of a CRAB/MELCOR Framework for Microreactor Safety Analysis"
The Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) [1] is an open-source, parallel finite element framework which provides the foundation formany advanced modeling and simulation tools developed under the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program [2] for the analysis of advanced reactors. The MOOSE framework provides the common foundational capability on which many NEAMS codes for reactor analysis are built. The MOOSE framework also includes several systems to assemble unique workflows and coupling amongMOOSE-based applications. In particular, the MultiApp and Transfer systems are widely used to assemble different MOOSE-based or MOOSE- wrapped physics applications together to perform loosely or tightly coupled multiphysics simulations. The National Reactor Innovation Center’s (NRIC’s) Virtual Test Bed (VTB) [3] hosts publicly available nuclear reactor multiphysics simulation examples which leverage MOOSE’s MultiApp system to meet the modeling needs of different reactor types. The flexibility and robustness of coupling provided by MOOSE permits rapid development of coupled physics models for a wide range of reactor types and events.
The Multiphysics Object Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) [1] is an open-source, parallel finite element framework which provides the foundation for many advanced modeling and simulation tools developed under the Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Program [2] for the analysis of advanced reactors. The MOOSE framework provides the common foundational capability on which many NEAMS codes for reactor analysis are built. The MOOSE framework also includes several systems to assemble unique workflows and couplingamong MOOSE-based applications. In particular, the MultiApp and Transfer Systems are widely used to assemble different MOOSE-based or MOOSE-wrapped physics applications together to perform loosely or tightly coupled multiphysics simulations. The National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) Virtual Test Bed (VTB) [3] hosts publicly available nuclear reactor multiphysics simulation examples which leverage MOOSE’s MultiApp System to meet the modeling needs of different reactor types. The flexibility and robustness of coupling provided by MOOSE permits rapid development of coupled physics models for a wide range of reactor types and events
This is an updated slide deck for which much of the content has been previously cleared. This slide deck incorporates recent NRIC Virtual Test Bed work with several updates on modeling and simulation of benchmark advanced reactor problems. Note that none of the models or results contained within these slides is proprietary. Many of these have been openly published on the Virtual Test Bed.
With the next generation of nuclear reactors under development, modeling and simulation (M&S) tools are being developed by the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program in order to support their design, licensing, and future operation. Mirroring the physical test beds currently under construction (i.e., EBR-II and ZPPR), the Virtual Test Bed (VTB) was launched by the National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) in collaboration with NEAMS to support the advanced reactor community. This collaborative effort, which involves multiple teams at both Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory aims to use NEAMS tools to model a wide range of reactor designs. Those models are automatically tested to ensure their continued functionality as the tools are further developed. Examples are extensively documented, each acting as a tutorial for applying the relevant NEAMS tools to that reactor design. Currently, five advanced reactor types (with a total of eight specific design variants) are simulated by a variety of different models. These models range from steady-state, core multiphysics simulations to integrated plant analysis during loss-of-flow transients.
The MOOSE Framework is a foundational capability used by NEAMS to create over 15 different simulation tools for advanced nuclear reactors. Due to this ubiquity, improvements to the framework in support of modeling and simulation goals are critical to the program. These improvements can take many forms including optimization, improved user experience, streamlined APIs, parallelism, and new capability. The work transcribed in the report was in direct support of the simulation tools and is already deployed or will be deployed in the coming months. The capabilities implemented were, in the same order as this report, chainable execution objects or executors, support for transfers between applications at the same level in a coupling scheme, support for boundary/subdomain restricted transfers, support for transfers between applications with different coordinate or unit systems, support for MOOSE applications in the NEAMS workbench, deployment of MOOSE application of the INL HPC OnDemand platform, addition of a triangular meshing library in libMesh and increased support of face variables.
The Virtual Test Bed (VTB) was established to support the deployment of advanced reactors by facilitating the use of state-of-the-art modeling and simulation capabilities. These tools can solve previously prohibitive challenge problems with greater levels of fidelity and in a multiphysics framework. A VTB repository was recently set up to host models for a wide variety of reactor types and using a range of Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation-developed software. The repository currently includes models for High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors, Sodium Fast Reactors, Fluoride-salt-cooled High-temperature Reactors, Molten Salt Reactors, and Heat-Pipe Microreactors. This article provides an overview of the capabilities currently in the VTB repository.
Many material and structure failures are initiated at the interface between two distinctive materials, such as the debonding of interfaces of matrix/fiber of composites or bulk matrix/inclusion in metals at micro-scales. Accurate and robust modeling of these interface failures is critical to the design of novel material and structure with improved functionality. This paper presents a robust implementation of a discontinuous Galerkin finite element method in MOOSE based on the Incomplete Interior Penalty Galerkin scheme for modeling material interface behavior. This DG-based interface method naturally accommodates important extrinsic cohesive zone material models and is capable of modeling the failures of material interfaces across which material properties are highly distinctive. We demonstrate a good performance of the proposed method using single fiber and multiple fiber debonding problems.