Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Peter Zaal.
NASA Ames SimLabs is home to unique simulation facilities capable of a wide range of aerospace systems research. This presentation will focus on the Vertical Motion Simulator with thoughts on future AR/VR applications and research.
The importance and benefit of improved monitoring is increasingly recognized. Improved training may be a valuable intervention. Our study (conducted 2019) assessed and trained airline First Officers on flight path monitoring skills. The exploratory study assessed monitoring pre-training in a simulator session that included monitoring challenges (8 or 7 events). A 1-hour interactive training followed, based on the Sensemaking Model of Monitoring; it presented concepts and examples using a slide deck, discussion, and simple activities. Post-training assessment used scenarios with analogous monitoring challenges (7 or 8 events) but a different setting. Performance showed significant and relatively consistent improvement. Training monitoring as sensemaking merits further investigation.
An overview of the simulation facilities at SimLabs at NASA Ames. Main focus is on the Vertical Motion Simulator or VMS, also brief descriptions of other simulators. Discussion of the history and general specifications of the VMS. Also, provide an overview of past research and training conducted on the simulators, and some future developments with a focus on AR/VR technologies.
This presentation discusses research needs to support evidence-based qualification standards for Flight Simulation Training Devices (FSTDs) with head mounted displays (HMDs). Currently, the FAA and EASA have no qualification standards specifically for FSTDs using HMDs and extended reality (XR) visuals, and existing qualification standards may not be sufficient. Special Conditions can be prescribed for the evaluation and qualification of individual devices, but these Special Conditions need to be assessed and adjusted on a case-by-case basis resulting in an elaborate process. Furthermore, test tolerances used in Special Conditions are often based on conventional visual systems and may not be adequate. This presentation first identifies gaps in the current knowledge of using HMDs in pilot training, and, more specifically, using HMDs in the training of manual aircraft control with motion cues. Next, research is proposed to help close these gaps, inform the development of qualification criteria and tolerances, and guide efforts to update regulations. The Vertical Motion Simulator (VMS) at NASA Ames Research Center, with its large motion capability, is currently undergoing significant upgrades including a state-of-the-art out-the-window visual system. In addition, an HMD capability will be introduced to use in conjunction with the conventional visual system. With its long history of setting standards in the simulation industry, the VMS is the ultimate tool to conduct research that could help accelerate the development of standards for the use of HMDs in FSTDs. The goal of the talk is ultimately to spark a discussion about the research needs and priorities to best serve the development of new qualification standards.
This paper investigates the effects of simulator motion fidelity on pilot performance using mixed-reality visuals. In NASA’s Vertical Motion Simulator, eleven pilots flew a lift-plus-cruise electric vertical takeoff and landing vehicle in a vertiport approach and landing task under four different motion conditions: no motion, small hexapod motion, large hexapod motion, and full motion. The simulator motion condition statistically significantly affected: 1) the severity of cybersickness, 2) motion ratings, 3) final approach and take-off boundary crossing groundspeeds, 4) longitudinal touchdown point, and 5) battery time remaining after landing. These results suggest that the use of motion systems in simulators with virtual- or mixed-reality visuals is warranted.