Results of the AGR-2 TRISO fuel performance demonstration irradiation experiment in the Advanced Test Reactor
Not Available
Demkowicz, Paul A.↗
Engineering topics
Pham, Binh T.
Publications and source records attributed to Pham, Binh T..
Power Density Waterfalls Plots for AGR-1, AGR-2 US UCO, and AGR-5/6/7 Experiments
Task: Generate plots of the distribution of power per particle per power bin over time. Kairos needs these for licensing purposes. Basically, they need to know which power/particle was sustained by which fraction of the fuel and for how long. The idea is to leverage AGR results. However, Kairos wants to operate at relatively high power/particle and, therefore, they need to check how much of their range is covered by AGR. These plots are made for AGR-1, AGR-2 US UCO, and what is predicted for AGR-5/6 and AGR-7 (for which there are no daily as-run values but projected values for every cycle). The predicted AGR-5/6/7 data was provided by the attached Excel file in an Email by Blaise Collin to Cam Binh Pham on May 21, 2018.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Perceptual learning through optimization of attentional weighting: human versus optimal Bayesian learner
Human performance in visual detection, discrimination, identification, and search tasks typically improves with practice. Psychophysical studies suggest that perceptual learning is mediated by an enhancement in the coding of the signal, and physiological studies suggest that it might be related to the plasticity in the weighting or selection of sensory units coding task relevant information (learning through attention optimization). We propose an experimental paradigm (optimal perceptual learning paradigm) to systematically study the dynamics of perceptual learning in humans by allowing comparisons to that of an optimal Bayesian algorithm and a number of suboptimal learning models. We measured improvement in human localization (eight-alternative forced-choice with feedback) performance of a target randomly sampled from four elongated Gaussian targets with different orientations and polarities and kept as a target for a block of four trials. The results suggest that the human perceptual learning can occur within a lapse of four trials (<1 min) but that human learning is slower and incomplete with respect to the optimal algorithm (23.3% reduction in human efficiency from the 1st-to-4th learning trials). The greatest improvement in human performance, occurring from the 1st-to-2nd learning trial, was also present in the optimal observer, and, thus reflects a property inherent to the visual task and not a property particular to the human perceptual learning mechanism. One notable source of human inefficiency is that, unlike the ideal observer, human learning relies more heavily on previous decisions than on the provided feedback, resulting in no human learning on trials following a previous incorrect localization decision. Finally, the proposed theory and paradigm provide a flexible framework for future studies to evaluate the optimality of human learning of other visual cues and/or sensory modalities.
Non-NASA Center↗