Engineering topics

Pieter Buning

Publications and source records attributed to Pieter Buning.

5 records

NASA NTRS2021

Assessment and Improvement of RANS-based Transition Models based on Experimental Data of the Common Research Model with Natural Laminar Flow

Transition models based on auxiliary transport equations augmenting the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) framework often rely upon the correlations that were derived from a limited number of low-speed experiments and do not account for all of the transition mechanisms and/or their variation with the significant flow parameters. Available data from a recent experiment in the National Transonic Facility at the NASA Langley Research Center are used to assess the current transition modeling capability in NASA's OVERFLOW 2.2o code for a swept wing configuration at transonic cruise conditions. Specifically, the OVERFLOW solutions are used together with detailed stability analysis of the boundary layer flow over the new Common Research Model with Natural Laminar Flow (CRM-NLF) to evaluate the accuracy and the robustness of the transport-equation-based transition models, with the goal of proposing improvements that would help to strengthen the physical basis of these models for the important class of flows involving the combined effects of crossflow and flow compressibility. Results highlight the significant underprediction of the laminar flow extent within the inboard region of the wing, wherein the onset of transition may be attributed to a gradual amplification of Tollmien-Schlichting instabilities.

Boundary layer transition↗

NASA NTRS2020

Assessment of Transition Modeling Capability in OVERFLOW with Emphasis on Swept-Wing Configurations

In preparation for comparisons with data obtained from the recently concluded experiments in the National Transonic Facility at the NASA Langley Research Center on the new common research model with natural laminar flow (CRM-NLF), an assessment of the current transition modeling capability in the NASA OVERFLOW 2.2o code has been carried out. A combination of the available experimental data and linear stability analysis is used to evaluate the accuracy and robustness of these models for selected swept-wing type configurations, with significant crossflow. An additional goal for this work involves providing a comparative assessment of the relevant transition models in the context of a single flow solver and identifying model limitations as well as the potential for future improvements that would help strengthen the physical basis of such transition models. Included in this investigation is an assessment of the sensitivities of the underlying transition models to grid resolution (wall-normal, as well as streamwise and spanwise) and the values of extra input parameters such as the level of surface roughness and freestream turbulence variables. The flow configurations targeted in this assessment include the NASA NLF(2)-0415 swept-wing configuration, the sickle-shaped wing introduced by the Technical University of Braunschweig, and the wing-body configuration of the CRM model from the fourth and fifth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshops.

Freestream velocity↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

OVERFLOW Training

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Joseph Derlaga↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

GPU Implementation of the OVERFLOW CFD Code

The high-performance computing (HPC) landscape is quickly changing to systems where most of the performance comes from specialized chips, specifically graphics processing units (GPUs). Such GPU systems are throughput machines, where efficient use of the GPU often requires code refactoring to expose a few orders of magnitude more fine grain parallelism than was previously used on the CPU. Recent modifications to OVERFLOW, an overset, structured grid, computational fluid dynamics flow solver, written in Fortran will be presented. These modifications include both code modernization efforts and algorithmic changes to enable OVERFLOW to efficiently utilize GPUs. Many of these algorithmic changes would likely also be applicable for other structured grid, stencil-based codes wanting to utilize GPUs. The capabilities that have been ported to run on the GPUs are presented, along with the performance gains of the GPU version relative the CPU version of OVERFLOW.

GPU Programming↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Strategies for the GPU Implementation of the OVERFLOW CFD Code

Wondering how to port a large, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver, written in Fortran, to run effectively on GPUs? Join this talk to learn about the strategies NASA’s OVERFLOW CFD code has used to effectively utilize GPUs to greatly improve the time to solution compared to CPUs. OVERFLOW is an overset, structured grid, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) flow solver developed by NASA and widely used by government, US industry, and academia. It is known for its effective use of CPU hardware, but this talk will discuss recent efforts to modify the code to run efficiently on GPUs. We will describe our use of OpenACC, CUDA Fortran, and CUDA C++, discussing why and how we use each to map our problem onto NVIDIA GPUs. We will also describe structural changes we made in the code to expose enough parallelism to effectively use the GPU hardware. Finally, we will present the performance benefits from running OVERFLOW on GPUs compared to the well optimized CPU version of the code.

GPU Programming↗