Engineering topics
Piri, Mohammad
Publications and source records attributed to Piri, Mohammad.
A comparative investigation of the effect of gas type on foam strength and flow behavior in tight carbonates
Foam generation technique has been practically applied to overcome gas mobility issue during enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. Incorporated with the utilized gas, the capability of foaming agent to generate persistent foam determines the flow performance under reservoir conditions. Here, in this study, we first identified the surfactants with excellent phase behavior and foaming properties and, second, evaluated their bulk foam performance with different gases, including N 2 , CO 2 , and hydrocarbon gas (CH 4 ) under high-pressure and high-temperature conditions. In bulk, the foam generated with the high-density gas, i.e., CO 2 , exhibited the greatest foamability but the lowest foam stability. With amidoamine oxide-based surfactant, CH 4 -foam was found to be more stable than N 2 -foam, while the opposite was observed for sulfobetaine-based surfactant. The most effective surfactant was later used to perform flow experiments on two tight carbonate rocks, including Minnesota Norther Cream Buff and Edwards limestone, with permeabilities of ~0.8 and 16 mD, respectively. The core-flooding experiments showed that the optimum quality of CO 2 -foam was lower than that of N 2 - and CH 4 -foams. For a given flow rate and fixed foam quality, the steady-state strength followed the descending order of CH 4 -, N 2 -, and CO 2 -foam. However, in general, the difference in foam strength between N 2 - and CH 4 -foams was insignificant when the total flow rate was varied. We also found that the variation in rock permeability had a greater effect on the strength of the CO 2 -foam compared to those generated with N 2 and CH 4 . In the presence of oil, the shear-thinning behavior of all foams was found more prominent. The increase in oil saturation had a more adverse effect on the strength of N 2 - and CH 4 -foams, particularly in the higher permeability rock. The results indicated that the foam strength, which is key in the effectiveness of foam EOR applications, is greatly influenced by several factors such as gas density, gas solubility in water, the presence of oil, and rock permeability.
Methane foam performance in oil-wet unconsolidated porous media: A systematic experimental investigation at reservoir conditions
Methane foam performance was systematically evaluated using high-pressure and high-temperature experiments performed on oil-wet proppant packs. The sensitivities of foam performance to various key factors, including surfactant concentration, foam quality, total injection rate, salinity, operating pressure, and initial oil saturation were examined. The results showed that even though the foamability and foam strength in oil-wet proppant packs were adversely affected by wettability and presence of oil, the steady-state pressure drops across the proppant packs were insensitive to the quantity of oil initially present. The presence of oil above the critical oil saturation impeded the onset of foam generation. This suggested that the foamability of surfactants depends on the synergetic effects of surfactant’s ionic nature and foam parameters, such as foam quality and total injection rate, on their ability to reduce the oil saturation to a threshold value below which favorable bubble generation sites could be created. It was observed that, for low injection rate, anionic surfactant was ineffective at low salinity conditions, while amphoteric agent performed well at all salinities. Additionally, an increase in salinity resulted in enhanced pressure drop across the proppant packs for both anionic and amphoteric surfactants. Further, the results also established that too high operating pressures are somewhat detrimental to the foam strength and stability, irrespective of the ionic nature of foaming agents and the wettability of the porous medium. For the anionic surfactant, the increase in the total flow rate was found to mitigate the adverse effects of low salt concentration and operating pressure. Results from quality-sensitivity foam tests identified two regions for the foam behavior, named low-quality and high-quality regimes, separated by the transition foam quality. Finally, we discuss the implications of the results for the design and effective implementation of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) schemes that deploy hydrocarbon-based foams.
Methane foam performance evaluation in water-wet unconsolidated porous media: A systematic experimental investigation at elevated pressure and temperature conditions
In the petroleum industry, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques employ foam extensively to establish conformance control in heterogeneous and fractured reservoirs in order to increase the sweep efficiency. In such applications, foam performance evaluation under complex subsurface conditions is pivotal for the effective and optimized deployment of foam treatment. However, there is a scarcity of hydrocarbon gas foam generation and evaluation studies that examine the relationships between foam performance and the critical foam parameters at high-pressure and high-temperature conditions. Here, this study aims at methodically investigating the effects of several foam parameters on methane foam performance in water-wet proppant packs under harsh operating conditions. This is in relation to the technical needs of hydrocarbon foam injection into hydraulically-induced, propped fractures in unconventional oil reservoirs. To this end, a state-of-the-art experimental foam generation apparatus was designed, fabricated, and commissioned. We performed a large number of foam flow experiments on proppant packs using methane gas and different foaming agents at 3500 psi and 115°C. Anionic and amphoteric surfactants were employed to probe the effect of their ionic nature on foam performance. Foam performance sensitivities to various foam generation parameters and operating conditions, such as surfactant concentration, gas fraction, total injection rate, operating pressure, salinity, and proppant pack length were investigated. To this end, steady-state pressure drops across the proppant packs during foam generation and foam's apparent viscosity were measured to quantify the foam performance of surfactants. The results were then analyzed to determine optimum values of the foam parameters and the interplay between these parameters are discussed here. The systematic results achieved from this work are in agreement with the trends available in the literature and provide new insights into complexities of in situ foam generation in water-wet, unconsolidated porous media at extreme reservoir conditions.
The effects of in-situ emulsion formation and superficial velocity on foam performance in high-permeability porous media
Foam has been considered as a mobility control agent for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) applications in heterogeneous and fractured reservoirs. Foam enhances sweep efficiency by enabling the injected gas to flow from high-permeability to low-permeability regions. The foam injection velocity is an essential factor affecting foam mobility control and flow behavior. Furthermore, the presence of remaining oil adversely impacts foam generation leading to a failure in governing mobility control. In this study, foam performance in establishing mobility control effect and favorable apparent viscosity was experimentally investigated under a range of total superficial velocities in the presence and absence of crude oil during foam propagation in high permeability sand packs representing a propped fracture network. In the absence of oil, a pronounced effect of total superficial velocity on the mobility control performance was observed at the transition foam quality regime. Co-injection of oil and foam led to noticeable foam destabilization, as expected. However, a further increase in oil fractional flow resulted in larger overall flow resistance. We found that the formation of in-situ surfactant/oil emulsion contributed to the high apparent viscosity exhibited at the steady-state condition. These findings suggest that the steady-state flow resistance established during foam flooding at high oil saturations should be interpreted as the mobility control effect resulting from emulsion formation rather than the development of strong foam.