Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Ponnampalam Balakumar

Publications and source records attributed to Ponnampalam Balakumar.

13 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2023

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES),and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES)are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985).1The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model.The unsteady RANS simulations,only with the compressibility correction,predict the pre- and post-buffet characteristics,which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment.The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment

Transonic Buffet↗
NASA NTRS2021

Boundary-layer Instability Measurements on a Cone at Freestream Mach 3.5

An experimental study was conducted in the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Langley Supersonic Low-Disturbance Tunnel to investigate naturally-occurring instabilities in a supersonic boundary layer on a 7◦ half-angle cone at nominal freestream conditions: Mach 3.5, total temperature of 299.8K, and unit Reynolds numbers (millions per m) of 9.89, 13.85, 21.77, and 25.73. Instability measurements were acquired under noisy-flow and quiet-flow conditions. Pitot-pressure and calibrated hot-wire measurements were obtained using a model-integrated traverse system to document the model flow field. In noisy-flow conditions, growth rates and mode shapes achieved good agreement between the measured results and linear stability theory (LST). The corresponding N factor at transition from LST is N ≈ 3.9. Under quiet-flow conditions, the most unstable first-mode instabilities as predicted by LST were measured, but this mode was not the dominant instability measured in the boundary layer. Instead, the dominant instabilities were less-amplified, low-frequency disturbances predicted by LST, and grew according to linear theory. These low-frequency unstable disturbances were initiated by freestream acoustic disturbances through a receptivity process believed to occur near the branch I location of the cone. Under quiet-flow conditions, the boundary layer remained laminar up to the last measurement station for the largest unit Reynolds number, implying a transition N factor of N > 8.5.

Boundary Layer↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Supersonic Traveling Crossflow Wave Characteristics in Ground and Flight Tests

This paper continues analysis of data acquired in a series of supersonic crossflow transition experiments on a 65° swept- wing model tested in both wind tunnel and flight. Flow visualization data are summarized to provide context for the swept-wing instability mechanisms of interest. Unsteady pressure measurements obtained near the wing model leading edge (LE) are studied using 2nd- and 3rd-order statistical methods to extract traveling crossflow wave characteristics from these data. Comparisons between tunnel and flight data with boundary-layer (BL) Linear Stability Theory (LST) predictions provide insights into BL transition phenomena similarities and differences observed in tests using the same swept-wing model configurations. Comparisons of unsteady pressure data results for wing LE configurations with and without distributed-roughness-element (DRE) patterns installed, suggest traveling crossflow disturbance growth is reduced when this type of flow control is applied. A brief stud y of different background surface roughness levels on the wing LE suggests the potential for another flow control approach to promote laminar flow on swept wings using streamwise-biased surface finishes.

Lewis R Owens↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Laminar to Turbulence Transition in Boundary Layers due to Tripping Devices

Direct numerical simulations (DNS)and linear stability analyses were performed to identify the mechanisms by whichtwo-and three-dimensional trips promote early transition in subsonic boundary layers over a flat plate. Investigations were conducted for threeboundary-layer transition trip configurations:a two-dimensional smooth hump,a two-dimensional rectangular-shapedrod and a three-dimensional zig-zagtape. The smooth hump was used by Park et al.1in the linear and nonlinear parabolized stability (PSE) computations. Reynolds numbersbased on the tripheights are 710, 683,and 300 for the two-and three-dimensional trips, respectively. Simulations withthe smooth hump showed that the flow becomes stable upstream and strongly unstable downstream of the hump. Simulations with the two-dimensional rectangular trip showed that the flow separates at the top of the trip and forms a long recirculation zonedownstream. However, the flow remains steady in the simulation without any external disturbances. Linear stability analysis showed that the inflectional profile in the recirculation zone is strongly unstable to frequencies in the range of 100-300 Hz. Simulations with the external disturbances forced at the frequency of 200 Hz showed that disturbances grow strongly inside the recirculation zone as observed in the Klebanoff2 experiment. Three-dimensional simulations with secondary disturbances of fundamental, subharmonic, and oblique types produced turbulent flows shortlydownstream. The three-dimensional zig-zag trip with a small roughness Reynolds number lead to early breakdown to a turbulent flow.

Stability↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulations for High-Lift Configurations using FUN3D

Wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) capability has recently been implemented into FUN3D, an unstructured, node-centered, finite-volume solver developed at the NASA Langley Research Center. In this paper, WMLES is assessed for two configurations that are representative for high-lift applications. The first configuration is a nominal two-dimensional multielement airfoil that has been extensively studied in the literature. WMLES solutions are computed for four angles of attack and compared with previously reported solutions. Good agreement of integrated forces, surface pressures, and boundary-layer velocity profiles is shown with available experimental data especially at lower angles of attack. WMLES solutions are also computed for the NASA High-Lift Common Research Model over a large range of angles of attack. Forces, pitching moments, and pressure distributions are favorably compared with the experimental data up to the maximum lift, including the angle of attack where the maximum lift is obtained experimentally. Eddy visualization techniques of q-criterion and density-gradient magnitude illustrate the resolved content.

High-Lift flows↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre-and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre-and post-buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the span wise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of UMUSCL Scheme for DNS of Turbulent Flows

Direct numerical simulation (DNS) is performed using an unstructured node-based finite-volume methodology for canonical turbulent flow configurations to assess the effect of the upwinding parameter (κ) in the unstructured monotonic upstream scheme for conservation laws (UMUSCL) reconstruction scheme. The NASA FUN3D solver is used, and four turbulent validation cases are considered: periodic Taylor-Green vortex, (2) flow through a plane channel, (3) flow through a channel with a constriction, and (4) flow over a flat plate. The results are presented for κ = 0.5, 0.9 and 1 on hexahedral grids, with the last value corresponding to a zero-numerical dissipation scheme. Detailed comparisons with available reference data indicate that for the smallest length-scales simulated, κ = 0.5 is too dissipative while κ = 1 could lead to an energy build-up. Overall, κ =0.9 yields satisfactory results in terms of accuracy and robustness for all the cases considered in this study.

Direct Numerical Simulation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluation of Wall-Modeled Les for Flow Over A Multi-Element Airfoil

We perform wall-modeled large-eddy simulations (WMLES) of turbulent flow over a 30P30N multielement airfoil at various angles of attack to assess its ability to accurately predict lift using an unstructured node-based finite-volume methodology. The flow conditions are based on the experiments reported in Klausmeyer & Lin [NASA /TM-112858]. The oncoming flow Mach number is 0.2, and the stowed chord-based Reynolds number (𝑅𝑒𝑐) is 9 million. The angle of attack (𝛼) is varied between 8◦ and 23◦ with the expected stall angle of around 21◦. The simulated geometry is periodic in the span, thus any three-dimensional effects present in the experiment are ignored. We first analyze the predictions with baseline isotropic and anisotropic grids containing over 16 grid points per boundary-layer thickness. The near-wall streamwise/nominal spacing ratio is 0.4 at the leading/trailing edges of the slat, main element and flap, and 1 elsewhere, and the first wall-normal/nominal spacing ratio is 0.375 over most of the airfoil for the anisotropic grid, while these are unity for the isotropic grid. It is found that the predicted lift and wall pressures, near-wall velocity profiles, and the location of onset of resolved turbulence are sensitive to the near-wall grid anisotropy. Further sensitivities were explored at lower angles of attack by independently varying the streamwise and wall-normal grid anisotropies. The effects of both off-wall and near-wall grid refinement were also quantified. For the grid resolutions used here, our results suggest that the first wall-normal spacing, which coincides with the WMLES exchange location, has a dominant effect on the predictions for this flow configuration.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over NACA-0012 and OAT15A Airfoils

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012, OAT15A airfoils at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75, and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10 and 3million, respectively. The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre- and post- buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over NACA-0012 and OAT15A Airfoils

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012, OAT15A airfoils at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75, and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10 and 3million, respectively. The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre- and post- buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗