Effects of silanol defects and Ti site location within Ti-MWW on alkene epoxidation with aqueous hydrogen peroxide
Not Available
Engineering topics
Publications and source records attributed to Potts, David S..
Not Available
Not Available
Abstract Vapor‐phase propylene (C 3 H 6 ) epoxidation kinetics with hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) strongly reflects the physical properties of Ti‐incorporated zeolite catalysts and the presence of spectating molecules (“solvent”) near active sites even without a bulk liquid phase. Steady‐state turnover rates of C 3 H 6 epoxidation and product selectivities vary by orders of magnitudes, depending on the zeolite silanol ((SiOH) x ) density, pore topology (MFI, *BEA, FAU), and the quantity of condensed acetonitrile (CH 3 CN) molecules nearby active sites, under identical reaction mechanisms sharing activated H 2 O 2 intermediates on Ti surfaces. Individual kinetic analyses for propylene oxide (PO) ring‐opening, homogeneous diol oxidative cleavage, and homogeneous aldehyde oxidation reveal that secondary reaction kinetics following C 3 H 6 epoxidation responds more sensitively to the changes in zeolite physical properties and pore condensation with CH 3 CN. Thus, higher PO selectivities achieved in hydrophilic Ti‐MFI at steady‐state reflect the preferential stabilization of transition states for C 3 H 6 epoxidation (a primary reaction) relative to PO ring‐opening and oxidative cleavage (secondary reactions) that solvation effects that reflect interactions among condensed CH 3 CN within pores and the extended pore structure.
Vapor-phase propylene (C 3 H 6 ) epoxidation kinetics with hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) strongly reflects the physical properties of Ti-incorporated zeolite catalysts and the presence of spectating molecules (“solvent”) near active sites even without a bulk liquid phase. Steady-state turnover rates of C 3 H 6 epoxidation and product selectivities vary by orders of magnitudes, depending on the zeolite silanol ((SiOH) x ) density, pore topology (MFI, *BEA, FAU), and the quantity of condensed acetonitrile (CH 3 CN) molecules nearby active sites, under identical reaction mechanisms sharing activated H 2 O 2 intermediates on Ti surfaces. Individual kinetic analyses for propylene oxide (PO) ring-opening, homogeneous diol oxidative cleavage, and homogeneous aldehyde oxidation reveal that secondary reaction kinetics following C 3 H 6 epoxidation responds more sensitively to the changes in zeolite physical properties and pore condensation with CH 3 CN. Thus, higher PO selectivities achieved in hydrophilic Ti-MFI at steady-state reflect the preferential stabilization of transition states for C 3 H 6 epoxidation (a primary reaction) relative to PO ring-opening and oxidative cleavage (secondary reactions) that solvation effects that reflect interactions among condensed CH 3 CN within pores and the extended pore structure.
A combination of kinetic, thermodynamic, and spectroscopic techniques demonstrates that increasing the water fraction within organic solvents accelerates alkene epoxidations while suppressing the undesired H 2 O 2 decomposition pathway.
Solvent molecules interact with reactive species and alter the rates and selectivities of catalytic reactions by orders of magnitude. Specifically, solvent molecules can modify the free energies of liquid phase and surface species via solvation, participating directly as a reactant or co-catalyst, or competitively binding to active sites. These effects carry consequences for reactions relevant for the conversion of renewable or recyclable feedstocks, the development of distributed chemical manufacturing, and the utilization of renewable energy to drive chemical reactions. First, we describe the quantitative impact of these effects on steady-state catalytic turnover rates through a rate expression derived for a generic catalytic reaction (A → B), which illustrates the functional dependence of rates on each category of solvent interaction. Second, we connect these concepts to recent investigations of the effects of solvents on catalysis to show how interactions between solvent and reactant molecules at solid–liquid interfaces influence catalytic reactions. Furthermore, this discussion demonstrates that the design of effective liquid phase catalytic processes benefits from a clear understanding of these intermolecular interactions and their implications for rates and selectivities.