Pozo-Palacios, Jonatan

DOE OSTI2023

Comparison of forward and inverse cam generation methods for the design of cam-linkage mechanisms

This paper presents a comparison between the forward and inverse cam generation methods applied to the design of a multi-lobed cam-rocker slider mechanism for function generation. In the forward method, the cam profile is specified directly and then the linkage output is determined using kinematics. In the inverse method, the trajectory of the output link is specified first and then the cam profile is determined using inverse linkage kinematics. First, the cam-linkage mechanism is introduced, and relevant kinematic equations are presented. Then, the cam generation methods are thoroughly explained. Here, the two cam generation methods are applied to a case study of a hydraulic motor using a multi-lobed cam and multiple linkage mechanisms. While the forward method has direct control of the cam shape, the inverse method has direct control of the linkage output and offers an advantage in calculation speed. For the mechanism selected, the cam designed with the inverse method achieved a reduction of at least 50.97% in the torque ripple when compared to the cam designed with the forward method.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2021

Experimental Validation of Subsystem Models for a Novel Variable Displacement Hydraulic Motor

A novel, variable displacement, low-speed high-torque hydraulic motor is being developed that is expected to be highly efficient across a broad operating range. To ensure the final hardware achieves the expected performance, the models used in the development of the motor must be experimentally validated and revised, as necessary. The specific focus in this work is on mechanical energy loss models that were used to guide the design of a single-cylinder motor prototype and on experimental tests used for model validation. Ideally each model, whether friction loss in a piston/cylinder interface or energy loss due to leakage in a valve , would be individually validated by an independent test. This granular approach would remove any question of where the error lies and result in highly accurate models. However, many motor components have multiple forms of energy loss, creating difficulty in validating individual losses. Additionally, it is not physically realizable to divide many components into an individual model equivalent test. Testing the motor as a full assembly is possible, but pinpointing the source of discrepancies between the model and the hardware becomes difficult with dozens of models potentially being partially responsible. A compromise was found by separating the motor into functional component groups that are characterized by the type of loss and ability to test each subcomponent independently. By checking for correlation between test observations and model predictions, revisions could be implemented into the models. This allows future solutions to be more accurately predicted in the design phase to drive the design of better machines.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗