Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Preethi V Mysore

Publications and source records attributed to Preethi V Mysore.

Modeling the Effects of a Backward-Facing Step on Boundary-Layer Transition

We model transition to turbulence in a two-dimensional boundary layer downstream of a backward-facing step (BFS) along a flat plate. With the goal of evaluating the available engineering models for predicting the effects of step excrescences on the transition characteristics, two separate methodologies are used to monitor the streamwise shift in the transition onset location as the step height and the flow speed are varied across the range of a previously reported experiment involving step-height-to-local-displacement-thickness ratios of 0 < h/δ* < 1.6. Unlike the variable N -factor method from the previous literature, both of these methods are general in scope and do not involve any empirical correlations that are specific to step excrescences. The first of these techniques involves an N -factor method that directly accounts for the change in boundary-layer instability characteristics due to the step. Stability computations using the harmonic linearized Navier-Stokes equations (HLNSE), which fully account for the nonparallel-mean-flow effects close to the BFS, indicate that the measured transition locations at nearly all test conditions ( h/δ* < 1.3) correlate well with a computed N -factor of N tr = 7.6, demonstrating a successful stability-based transition criterion related to step excrescences. Linear stability theory, which does not account for nonparallel effects, demonstrates reasonable agreement with the HLNSE results, yielding good predictions for the overall trends, but predicts a somewhat earlier onset of transition than HLNSE. The other methodology used in this work involves transport-equation-based transition models. We first show that the Langtry-Menter y - Re θt transition model cannot accurately predict the location of transition onset for moderate BFS heights because it is unable to accurately account for the flow history effects. Along with the Langtry-Menter transition model, we also show the amplification factor transport model does not produce accurate transition locations for subsonic flow over steps even though it accounts for some flow history effects.

Transition↗

Modeling the Effects of a Backward-Facing Step on Boundary-Layer Transition

We model transition to turbulence in a two-dimensional boundary layer downstream of a backward-facing step (BFS) along a flat plate. With the goal of evaluating the available engineering models for predicting the effects of step excrescences on the transition characteristics, two separate methodologies are used to monitor the streamwise shift in the transition onset location as the step height and the flow speed are varied across the range of a previously reported experiment involving step-height-to-local-displacement-thickness ratios of 0 < h/δ* < 1.6. Unlike the variable N -factor method from the previous literature, both of these methods are general in scope and do not involve any empirical correlations that are specific to step excrescences. The first of these techniques involves an N -factor method that directly accounts for the change in boundary-layer instability characteristics due to the step. Stability computations using the harmonic linearized Navier-Stokes equations (HLNSE), which fully account for the nonparallel-mean-flow effects close to the BFS, indicate that the measured transition locations at nearly all test conditions ( h/δ* < 1.3) correlate well with a computed N -factor of N tr = 7.6, demonstrating a successful stability-based transition criterion related to step excrescences. Linear stability theory, which does not account for nonparallel effects, demonstrates reasonable agreement with the HLNSE results, yielding good predictions for the overall trends, but predicts a somewhat earlier onset of transition than HLNSE. The other methodology used in this work involves transport-equation-based transition models. We first show that the Langtry-Menter y - Re θt transition model cannot accurately predict the location of transition onset for moderate BFS heights because it is unable to accurately account for the flow history effects. Along with the Langtry-Menter transition model, we also show the amplification factor transport model does not produce accurate transition locations for subsonic flow over steps even though it accounts for some flow history effects.

Transition↗

Toward Verification of the γ-Reθt Transition Model in OVERFLOW and FUN3D

The results of an ongoing assessment of the transition modeling capability in NASA's OVERFLOW and FUN3D programs are presented, with a focus on the Langtry-Menter γ-Reθt transition model in combination with the shear-stress transport (SST) turbulence model. While the effect of numerics and boundary conditions on the accuracy and iterative convergence of RANS solutions for fully turbulent flows has been well documented, especially in the context of canonical flow configurations, the same cannot be said for transport-equation-based transition models coupled with RANS-based turbulence models. Given the criticality of transition modeling for new aircraft design and optimization, there has been a renewed focus on the accuracy of such transition models and their inconsistent implementation across different flow solvers as seen from the AIAA and NATO-AVT workshops. In this work, we aim to establish the verification of such models via these two well established CFD codes with different numerics. The goal is to produce high-quality data, such as grids, solutions, and other auxiliary data, that may be utilized for code verification by others in the CFD community. As a first step, the work reported here is focused on the Langtry-Menter transition model as applied to two simple 2D configurations, namely the flat plate, and the NLF-0416, respectively. The paper also highlights how the boundary conditions and baseline turbulence model can affect the solutions from the SST-based Langtry-Menter transition model. A preliminary evaluation of the automatic mesh adaption capabilities of these solvers and potential benefits for flow configurations involving a mix of laminar, transitional, and fully turbulent flows is also reported.

CFD Modeling↗