Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Price, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Price, D..

Design and Performance of a Miniature Radar L-Band Transceiver

Radar electronics developed for past JPL space missions historically had been custom designed and as such, given budgetary, time, and risk constraints, had not been optimized for maximum flexibility or miniaturization. To help reduce cost and risk of future radar missions, a generic radar module was conceived. The module includes a 1.25-GHz (L-band) transceiver and incorporates miniature high-density packaging of integrated circuits in die/chip form. The technology challenges include overcoming the effect of miniaturization and high packaging density to achieve the performance, reliability, and environmental ruggedness required for space missions. The module was chosen to have representative (generic) functionality most likely required from an L-band radar. For very large aperture phased-array spaceborne radar missions, the large dimensions of the array suggest the benefit of distributing the radar electronics into the antenna array. For such applications, this technology is essential in order to bring down the cost, mass, and power of the radar electronics module replicated in each panel of the array. For smaller sized arrays, a single module can be combined with the central radar controller and still provide the bene.ts of configuration .exibility, low power, and low mass. We present the design approach for the radar electronics module and the test results for its radio frequency (RF) portion: a miniature, low-power, radiation-hard L-band transceiver.

McWatters, D.↗

The NOL Gap Test: Past, present, and future

A brief history of the development of the gap test is presented with emphasis on accumulated knowledge of how best to use it as a tool to assess relative shock sensitivity of explosives and propellants. Present information about the detonation process in build-up, steady state, and failure is used to show that failure diameter cannot give the desired shock sensitivity assessment. Suggestions are made for improving the test to an experiment. The use of spherical donors, water as attenuator, and camera instrumentation are briefly discussed.

Jacobs, S. J.↗