Engineering topics

Price, Matthew Anthony

Publications and source records attributed to Price, Matthew Anthony.

8 records

DOE OSTI2023

Experimental and modelling study of the effect of pre-shock duration on the double shock initiation response of PBX 9501

Here, a series of double shock initiation gas-gun experiments have been performed on PBX 9501 (95% weight HMX, 5% binder) in which the input conditions were nominally the same, but the time delay between the two shocks was explicitly varied. The impact conditions generated pre- and main shock pressures of 2.9 and 6.2 GPa respectively, with time delays between them ranging from 0.56 to 1.10 µs. This resulted in different levels of reaction behind the pre-shock prior to the main shock traversing the explosive samples, with the growth of reaction monitored using embedded particle velocity and shock tracker gauges. Simulated results from three reactive burn models (CREST, AWSD and SURF) are compared with the measured data to assess their ability to predict the response of PBX 9501 under such double shock conditions. The described experiments add to the body of evidence to help improve our understanding of the double shock initiation response of explosives, and the data obtained provide an excellent test for reactive burn models.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗

DOE OSTI2021

A reactive flow model for the 3,3'-diamino-4,4'-azoxyfurazan based plastic bonded explosive (PBX 9701)

Here, this paper describes the calibration of the Arrhenius Wescott–Stewart–Davis (AWSD) reactive flow model for the recently developed high explosive PBX 9701, which consists of 97% 3,3'-diamino-4,4'-azoxyfurazan (DAAF) and 3% FK-800 binder by weight. DAAF-based explosive formulations have several desirable qualities as they are relatively insensitive to non-shock insults but have higher performance than triaminotrinitrobenzene based formulations. Equations of state for the explosive reactants and products are calibrated using a combination of existing and new experimental data and theoretical calculations. The AWSD rate law calibration utilizes both one-dimensional shock-to-detonation and multidimensional rate stick experiments to capture the shock initiation and propagating detonation regimes. Validation of the calibrated model is demonstrated through comparison with recent gas-gun experiments.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

DOE OSTI2021

Shock to detonation transition of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) initially pressed to 1.65 g/cm 3

A novel set of experiments and reactive flow modeling of pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) is presented. In this work, the specific phenomenon of shock to detonation transition is examined, where an initial, relatively weak shock is propagated into pressed PETN powder at 1.65 g/cm 3 and the subsequent buildup to detonation is observed experimentally. These experiments, in conjunction with reactant and products’ equations of state, are utilized for building reactive flow models.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2021

On Two-Phase Pressure and Temperature Equilibration with Mie-Grüneisen Equations of State

In the course of reactive flow modeling, the phases of high explosive (HE) reactants and products introduce additional degrees of freedom to the underlying hydrodynamic equations of compressible reactive fluid mechanics. Hydrodynamic simulations track the bulk (mixture) conservation properties of mass, momentum and energy. When multiple phases are introduced, one must decide on appropriate closure rules to determine the relative phase volumes and energy distribution between the phases. One typical closure is to assume that the phases are in pressure and temperature equilibrium. Here, the requisite equations of p-T equilibration are explored for Mie-Grüneisen Equations of State (EOS). Examples with Davis reactants and Davis products EOSs will be given. The Davis forms are used in both the WSD and AWSD reactive flow models.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2020

A study of shock initiation experiments for the explosive PBX 9502 using three reactive burn models

Shock to detonation transition (SDT) experiments are essential in calibrating and validating reactive burn models for explosives. This work investigates the large collection of SDT test data for the explosive PBX 9502 at ambient temperature that was presented by Gustavsen, Sheffield, and Alcon [Journal of Applied Physics, 99, 114907 (2006)]. We first analyze the experimental data and compare two different methods of determining the shock transition time/distance (namely, the bilinear method and the single-curve method). This reveals some of the uncertainty in estimating shock transition points, which contributes to scatter in Pop-plot data. Next, we compare the WSD, AWSD, and SURFplus reactive burn models for a collection of approximately 20 experimental shots using the FLAG hydrocode. Error estimates are used to quantify how well each reactive burn model (and their respective parameter calibrations) performs at predicting the SDT process for a range of loading conditions. Additionally, the importance of mesh resolution and numerical dissipation in SDT simulations will be assessed.

75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND↗

DOE OSTI2020

Verification and Validation of High Explosive Reactive Burn Models Implemented in LANL's EAP and LAP Code Base

Reactive burn models represent a significant leap in high explosive (HE) modeling capability. The first generation of engineering models of HE detonation are called programmed burn models and they are largely based on the distance between a prescribed detonation point and each zone in a simulation. There have been many advancements to programmed burn models over the years and when the assumptions upon which they are based are met, a properly tuned programmed burn model can be highly accurate but if any of their assumptions is not met, as is the case for corner turning or weakly initiated HE burn, they will give the wrong answer. Reactive burn models represent an entirely new way of modeling HE burn. They use the local conditions of a zone – e.g. temperature, pressure or density – as calculated by a hydrocode to determine if and when the zone is going to detonate and if so, how rapidly. This difference opens up an entirely new set of capabilities for HE modeling. It makes it possible to accurately and predictively model phenomena like the effect of confinement and the formation of dead zones. Reactive burn models have seen sustained development effort at LANL for at least the last decade but several recent developments make it timely to transition reactive burn models from a research topic to a production tool. The main goal of this milestone is to facilitate and accelerate the adoption of reactive burn as a commonly available modeling option, with recommendations on the resolution that will be required and uncertainties associated with their modeling choices. To achieve this, we have performed verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification (UQ) assessments of AWSD and SURF/SURFplus in xRage and FLAG on a variety of different problems.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

DOE OSTI2020

Verification and Validation of High Explosive Reactive Burn Models Implemented in LANL's EAP and LAP Code Base (FY2020 L2 Milestone MRT 7129) [Slides]

Advanced reactive burn models enable phenomena to be modeled that aren’t possible with programmed burn. Programmed burn propagates a burn front at a prescribed speed from a prescribed initiation point. Reactive burn uses the hydro variables (pressure, temperature, etc.) to determine when, how rapidly, and to what extent a zone detonates. This enables a completely new set of problems to be simulated. Our goal in this milestone has been to improve the usability of reactive burn modes. Thus, the closure criteria are: 1. Perform code and solution verification of the reactive burn models using appropriate solutions and simplified HE setups. 2. Perform validation assessments using small-scale experiments. 3. Evaluate sensitivities and quantify uncertainties due to model form variations and mesh dependencies.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗

DOE OSTI2020

ZND Verification Tests for Reactive Burn Models in FLAG

The ZND theory, named after Zeldovich, von Neumann, and Doering, provides a simple model for one-dimensional ideal steady-state detonation. It assumes that the detonation wave front starts with a shock that is a discontinuous jump and is followed by a finite-length reaction zone. Reactive burn (also called reactive flow) models are based on ZND theory, as they model the shock initiation and detonation process with a finite reaction rate. The ZND wave propagation test is essentially the only available test case where an analytic solution exists for verification of reactive burn models in numerical codes. However, there are extensions and variants of the ZND test that have been devised for verification of multidimensional flows. The objective of this work is to provide verification of the reactive burn models currently implemented in the Lagrangian hydrocode FLAG and investigate the influence of mesh resolution, artificial viscosity models, and the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) Euler relaxer on the simulation results. The burn models of interest are the Wescott-Stewart-Davis (WSD) model, the Scaled Uniform Reactive Flow (SURF) model (specifically with the SURFplus model extension), and the Arrhenius shock temperature state dependent WSD (AWSD) model. Previously, Ralph Menikoff has used ZND tests for verification of the SURF and SURFplus models in the Eulerian hydrocode xRAGE. The ZND tests here are somewhat different than the approach by Menikoff. In particular, we use a piston-driven ZND detonation wave (via a prescribed constant velocity boundary condition) in a Lagrangian framework whereas Menikoff had a ZND wave followed by a invariant rarefaction wave. The xRAGE simulations were carried out on uniform grids and adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) grids. Although AMR was recently implemented in FLAG and now fully functional for 2D simulations, it will not be evaluated with ZND tests at this time. Some work has been done previously for validating the reactive burn models in FLAG. For example, the validation studies of SURF with shock-to-detonation (SDT) tests, cylinder tests, and gap-stick tests. Further validation of the AWSD, WSD, and SURF models is described in for SDT, multi-shock, cylinder, and corner-turning tests. Recently, a large parameter study with approximately twenty SDT tests was performed to validate the AWSD, WSD, SURF, and SURFplus models while also investigating mesh resolution and artificial viscosity settings. To the best of our knowledge, the current work represents the first documented verification of these burn models in FLAG. The reader should note that many of the tables and figures in this report use units of cm/g/µs, which are the default units for FLAG. However, some lengths and velocities are expressed in µm and mm/µs, respectively, which are typical units for detonation analyses.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗