Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

R. Christoffersen

Publications and source records attributed to R. Christoffersen.

Solar-Energetic-Particle Track-Production Rates at 1 au: Comparing In-Situ Particle Fluxes with Lunar Sample-Derived Track Densities

Heavy ( Z > 26) solar energetic particles (SEPs) with energies ~1 MeV/nucleon are known to leave visible damage tracks in meteoritic materials. The density of such `solar flare tracks' in lunar and asteroidal samples has been used as a measure of a sample's exposure time to space, yielding critical information on planetary space weathering rates, the dynamics and lifetimes of interplanetary dust grains, and the long-term history of solar particle fluxes. Knowledge of the SEP track accumulation rate in planetary materials at 1 au is critical for properly interpreting observed track densities. Here, we use in-situ particle observations of the 0.50-3.0 MeV/nuc Fe-group SEP ux taken by NASA's Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) to calculate a flux of track-inducing particles at 1 au of 6.0 × 10 5 cm -2 yr -1 str -1 . Using the observed energy spectrum of Fe-group SEPs, we find that the depth distribution of SEP-induced damage tracks inferred from ACE measurements matches closely to that recently measured in lunar sample 64455; however, the magnitude of the ACE-inferred rate is approximately 25× higher than that observed in the lunar sample. We discuss several hypotheses for the nature of this discrepancy, including inefficiencies in track formation, thermal annealing of lunar samples, erosion via space weathering processing, and variations in the SEP flux at the Moon, yet find no satisfactory explanation. We encourage further research on both the nature of SEP track formation in meteoritic materials and the flux of Fe-group SEPs at the lunar surface in recent and geologic times to resolve this discrepancy.

Interplanetary dust↗

Corrigendum to: Volatiles in Lunar Felsite Clasts: Impact-related Delivery of Hydrous Material to an Ancient Dry Lunar Crust

Hydrous components were measured in nominally anhydrous minerals, primarily lunar feldspar, and reported by Simon et al. (2020). In the feldspar mineral structure, these components are contained in the form of OH, H2O, and/or NH4+molecules (Johnson, 2006 and references therein). The advantages of the ion microprobe technique employed by Simon et al. (2020) include high spatial resolution, apparent insensitivity to crystal orientation, high precision, and low detection limits, but unlike complementary spectroscopy techniques (i.e., FTIR) they preclude assignment of molecular species(Mosenfelder et al. 2015). Convention in the lunar sample community is to report major elemental abundances and hydrogen as oxides, H2O is the oxide for H. This convention was not followed by Simon et al. (2020), but rather the measured hydrogen component was reported as H to avoid the appearance of assigning the measured hydrogen concentration to a specific molecular species. The speciation of the hydrous component in terrestrial feldspars varies predominantly between OH and H2O, with no apparent correlation to feldspar composition, and only slight correlation to volcanic-to-plutonic igneous rock type (Johnson and Rossman, 2004).

J. I. Simon↗

The Genesis Mission: A Unique Opportunity for Scientific Collaboration

The Genesis Solar Wind Sample Return was flown with the goal of creating a baseline of elemental and isotopic solar photospheric composition from solar matter (not rocks!) for use in cosmochemical modeling. No uses for the samples outside of Cosmochemistry were advertised, and for good reason. In these days of limited funding, there is an overwhelming tendency to look inward instead of recognizing that the best outcomes of science tend to be interdisciplinary. So, below, we suggest two radical acts of collaboration that we believe will accelerate the advancement of science.

A. J. G. Jurewicz↗

Characterizing Martian X-ray Amorphous Materials through Terrestrial Analogs

X-ray amorphous materials (i.e., lacking long-range crystallographic order) have been identified on the martian surface from orbit and in-situ. Initial models of orbital IR spectral data identified volcanic glasses [e.g., 1], but subsequent interpretations suggested that amorphous silicates are dominantly secondary in nature and formed from water-rock interactions [e.g., 2-4]. ThermalIR spectra from the Mini-Thermal Emission Spectrometer on the Spirit rover show evidence for the amorphous secondary product opaline silica[e.g., 5].X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements by the CheMin instrument on the Mars Science Laboratory rover have identified 20-70 wt.% amorphous materials in every sample analyzed in Gale crater to date [e.g., 6]. Mass balance calculations using CheMin results and bulk elemental measurements by the Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer suggest the amorphous component in Gale crater is variably enriched in Si, Fe, and S[e.g., 7,8].The compositions are not consistent with pure volcanic glass, indicating water must have been involved in the formation of amorphous materials in Gale crater. We seek to better constrain the conditions under which amorphous materials on Mars formed by studying the composition and short-range atomic order of amorphous materials in terrestrial analog environments via XRD and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

E. B. Rampe↗

Microstructural Characterization of Felsite Fragments From the Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis (ANGSA) Double Drive Tube 73001/73002

While the Moon’s surface is dominated by mafic igneous products formed through the crystallization of the lunar magma ocean, and the subsequent eruption of mare basalts – felsic magmatic fragments (variably referred to as felsites, granites, rhyolites or granophyres) have been identified from a number of Apollo samples (e.g. 12013[1], 14321[2], 15405[3] and 73215[4]). Magmatic edifices like the Gruithuisen Domes – silicic constructs sometimes found proximal to the basaltic mare provinces filling nearside basins, may represent a petrogenetic origin. However, this is, is complicated by the fact that they apparently predate mare volcanism (e.g. [5]). Additionally, crater-counting indicates that these silicic surface features also postdate radiogenic ages of Apollo felsites [6]. Various modes of felsic magmatism have been invoked to explain the presence of felsic lithologies on the Moon, including: 1) fractional crystallization and silicate liquid immiscibility; 2) partial melting of lunar crust through basaltic underplating; and 3) fractional crystallization of the mare parent magmas. Although these models are plausible, based on known Apollo samples and lunar meteorites, they are complicated by the lack of sample lithologies with intermediate composition between basaltic magmas and the felsic components, and the fact that partial melting of many crustal rock types on the Moon (e.g., anorthosite, troctolites) are unlikely to form granites. Along with other unique magmatic lithologies, new felsites have been identified within the < 1 mm size fractions of the ANGSA double drive core tube (73001/73002) from Apollo 17 station 3, sampling the light mantle landslide deposit from the South Massif [7]. These additional examples of lunar felsite will help us to better constrain the processes that lead to the formation of these evolved lithologies. To do this, we have employed a gambit of high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analytical techniques, including electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), cathodoluminescence and high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) imaging. These data provide unique insights into the felsite mineralogy and microstructures including the coexistence of quartz and tridymite in many of the fragments. In addition, these analyses provide petrological context and assist targeted in situ secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) measurements of the U-Pb systematics of accessory minerals, and the volatile abundances and D/H ratios of apatite grains identified within the clasts.

lunar↗

The Zircon-Reidite Shock Transformation: A Tem Study of Reidite Produced at A Newly Established 21.2 GPa Shock Pressure Threshold

The high-pressure polymorph of zircon (Zr2SiO4) is reidite, a phase with the scheelite structure that was first discovered to form at ca. 12 GPa in static high-pressure experiments [1]. Reidite was subsequently found to occur in naturally shocked zircons from several terrestrial impact localities [2,3], as well as in shock recovery-reverberation experiments performed above 20 GPa [4]. The nature and distribution of reidite occurrences in terrestrial impact localities has pointed to its potential use as a shock pressure indicator, as well as to the importance of understanding its age-reset effects in zircon geochronology [3]. In this study we have used coordinated SEM/Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) and Field-Emission Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (FE-STEM) to study the micro- and nanostructure of reidite and its shocked zircon host produced at 21.2 GPa under experimental shock recovery/reverberation conditions [5]. Our results document the TEM microstructure of reidite formed at a 21.2 GPa experimental shock pressure that is significantly lower than that observed in previous studies [4]. At these conditions the sample developed a diverse set of microstructures that have not been previously documented on the TEM scale.

shock metamorphism↗

High Resolution Imaging and Analysis of Terrestrial Impact Glass: Amorphous Materials, Phyllosilicates and Everything in Between

Introduction: Impact cratering is one of the most ubiquitous geologic processes shaping the surface of all solid bodies in our solar system. Impacts are also a major source of clay minerals, poorly crystalline clay-like phases and amorphous (i.e., lacking long-range atomic order) materials on Earth and Mars. Phyllosilicates and amorphous materials have consistently formed a major component (~20-70 wt%) of every single drilled rock and soil sample in Gale Crater on Mars, as determined by the CheMin instrument on Curiosity. The origin of the amorphous component is speculative, but could be primary impact or volcanic-produced glass(es) deposited via aeolian or fluvial processes, secondary aqueous alteration products or chemical precipitates; it is likely to be a combination of all three possibilities. Efforts to determine the composition of these materials across the rover’s traverse through Gale Crater are ongoing. Naturally occurring amorphous phases are found in a variety of environments on Earth, and terrestrial analogue studies may help shed light on how they may have formed on Mars. Primary and altered impact glass are likely widespread on Mars and may have contributed to the amorphous component found throughout Gale Crater. In its pristine, unaltered state, impact glass (i.e., melt glass) is considered amorphous. However, truly unaltered glass is rarely preserved in crater fill impactites as it quickly alters in the post-impact environ-ment, commonly forming a mixture of hydrated aluminosilicate phases whose structures are not always discernable at the microscale (i.e., they may be amorphous or contain short-range order). These phases are part of an incredibly complex group of materials; differences in their composition and crystalline structure (or lack thereof) and genetic relationship to the more well-crystalline clay minerals are often only discernable at the nanoscale, beyond the resolution of traditional X-ray diffractometers (XRD) and scanning electron microscopes/microprobes (SEM/EPMA) alone. In this contribution, we summarize recent results from ongoing characterization of clay minerals, poorly crystalline clay-like phases, and amorphous materials preserved in altered terrestrial impact glass from the Chicxulub (~66 Ma) and Ries (~15 Ma) impact structures. This work has been performed using a combination of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), SEM, microprobe/EPMA, Raman spectroscopy and XRD.

Impact crater↗

Evaluating Surface Exposure Timescales Derived From Solar Energetic Particle Track Densities for Grains From Apollo 17 Core Sample 73002

Space weathering causes the surface soils of airless bodies like the Moon to be morphologically, microstructurally, and chemically altered due to micrometeoroid bombardment and solar wind exposure. These processes produce a multitude of microstructural and chemical changes that accumulate on individual soil grains that are continuously exposed on the surface. One characteristic is the formation of solar wind damaged rims on grains which develop from low energy solar wind particles penetrating <100 nm in depth. Also present are solar energetic particle (SEP) tracks, which are nanoscale streaks of irradiation damage in grain interiors formed by heavy, high energy ions (predominantly Fe group nuclei) originating from solar energetic particles (SEPs) that penetrate millimeters below the surface.

J. A. McFadden↗