Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

R. Jakubek

Publications and source records attributed to R. Jakubek.

High Resolution Imaging and Analysis of Terrestrial Impact Glass: Amorphous Materials, Phyllosilicates and Everything in Between

Introduction: Impact cratering is one of the most ubiquitous geologic processes shaping the surface of all solid bodies in our solar system. Impacts are also a major source of clay minerals, poorly crystalline clay-like phases and amorphous (i.e., lacking long-range atomic order) materials on Earth and Mars. Phyllosilicates and amorphous materials have consistently formed a major component (~20-70 wt%) of every single drilled rock and soil sample in Gale Crater on Mars, as determined by the CheMin instrument on Curiosity. The origin of the amorphous component is speculative, but could be primary impact or volcanic-produced glass(es) deposited via aeolian or fluvial processes, secondary aqueous alteration products or chemical precipitates; it is likely to be a combination of all three possibilities. Efforts to determine the composition of these materials across the rover’s traverse through Gale Crater are ongoing. Naturally occurring amorphous phases are found in a variety of environments on Earth, and terrestrial analogue studies may help shed light on how they may have formed on Mars. Primary and altered impact glass are likely widespread on Mars and may have contributed to the amorphous component found throughout Gale Crater. In its pristine, unaltered state, impact glass (i.e., melt glass) is considered amorphous. However, truly unaltered glass is rarely preserved in crater fill impactites as it quickly alters in the post-impact environ-ment, commonly forming a mixture of hydrated aluminosilicate phases whose structures are not always discernable at the microscale (i.e., they may be amorphous or contain short-range order). These phases are part of an incredibly complex group of materials; differences in their composition and crystalline structure (or lack thereof) and genetic relationship to the more well-crystalline clay minerals are often only discernable at the nanoscale, beyond the resolution of traditional X-ray diffractometers (XRD) and scanning electron microscopes/microprobes (SEM/EPMA) alone. In this contribution, we summarize recent results from ongoing characterization of clay minerals, poorly crystalline clay-like phases, and amorphous materials preserved in altered terrestrial impact glass from the Chicxulub (~66 Ma) and Ries (~15 Ma) impact structures. This work has been performed using a combination of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), SEM, microprobe/EPMA, Raman spectroscopy and XRD.

Impact crater↗

Acid Alteration of Clay Minerals With Implication for Mars’ Surface Processes

The co-occurrence of phyllosilicates (clays) and sulfate stratigraphies at many locations on Mars are associated with a sharp change in surface conditions from neutral/alkaline pH during the Noachian (4.1-3.7 Ga) which favored the formation of clays to acidic conditions during the Hesperian (3.7-2.9 Ga) which favored the formation of sulfates. Yet, if these two contrasting geosystems were temporarily sequential, it is unknown how the Hesperian acidic conditions altered the previously formed clay units. We performed laboratory batch experiments to fingerprint the diagnostic features produced during interactions of Mars-analog clays and acidic solutions. Two clays, and silicon (IV) oxide, were reacted with solution of either sulfuric acid or filtered natural acid rock drainage (ARD) in plastic bottles. The solutions were adjusted at four pH values (1, 3, 5, and 7) and reacted at 4, 30, and 80°C for 3, 7, and 14 days. At the end of the experiments, the filtered supernatants were analyzed by ICP-MS while the solids were characterized by X-Ray Diffraction; Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence analyses; Raman and Short-Wave Infrared spectroscopies and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Results show that the solution chemistry played a key role in the evolution of the clay-solution systems. In H2SO4 systems, the solution pH steadily increased due to partial clay dissolution with no secondary phase formation detected. Contrary, in the ARD systems, the pH decreased due to the ample presence of Fe which controlled both the reactivity of clays by the growth of protecting surface coatings and the solution pH by the precipitation of Fe nanophases; secondary phase detected included goethite, jarosite, gypsum, and siderite. These results indicate that, on Mars, the chemical interaction between clays and acidic solutions was complex and dependent on the solution chemistry. Acidic, sulfate-rich solutions have a high dissolution capacity and could have induced widespread clay disintegration. Notably, if Fe-rich ARD was involved, the clays on Mars could have remained stable during acidic Hesperian period due to formation of protective coatings. Comparison of our results with martian observations will be performed to determine how acidic conditions could potentially affect clays in sedimentary settings, including the Gale crater.

L. Lefticariu↗