Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Rabiti, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Rabiti, C..

11 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

RELAP5-3D modelling of the HTTR-GT/H 2 secondary system and turbomachinery

High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactors (HTGRs) can be used for the cogeneration of electricity and hydrogen. The JAEA-operated High-Temperature engineering Test Reactor (HTTR-GT/H 2 ) is exploring using the reactor for electricity and hydrogen production. Here, a RELAP5-3D model of the HTTR-GT/H 2 secondary system has been developed using design information. The various components and heat exchangers in the secondary system were investigated, modified, and improved where applicable. With these changes made, the model was run, and the results were compared to the design conditions. The results for the sole-power generation mode were shown to fit the design conditions very well. The largest temperature difference was on the order of 7 K, and the largest pressure difference was on the order of 0.05 MPa. The results for the hydrogen cogeneration mode did not fit the design conditions as well as the other case. The largest temperature difference was about 39 K and the largest pressure difference was about 0.27 MPa at the compressor outlet. The larger differences for the hydrogen cogeneration mode are attributed to the various complex components and the flow being split in the secondary loop. A transient reduction in heat removal capability of the secondary system was investigated. Reactor temperatures were predicted to rise as a result. The core reactivity response due to this increase in temperature is investigated and is expected to add negative reactivity to the reactor.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Daily Market Analysis Capability and Results

Nuclear energy plays an important role in the U.S. energy mix that will likely need to be maintained or strengthened to achieve significant greenhouse gas reduction. However, maintaining the nuclear portfolio becomes increasingly challenging in the current U.S. energy market since the low price of natural gas and the penetration of subsidized and low-marginal cost variable renewable electricity (VRE) are affecting the profitability of nuclear units. In this context, building new nuclear power plants will require increased competitiveness with reduced capital and O&M costs and increased revenues enabled by changes in market policies or increased flexible operation. Within the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, the System Analysis and Integration Campaign has been acquiring the capability to model energy market economics in order to assist decision makers and nuclear utilities. The methods developed and codes acquired are displayed in Figure 1. The objective of this report is to describe the tools acquired for market analysis, and to illustrate their capabilities and complementarities with an example of analysis.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2018

ADAPTIVE SURROGATES WITHIN THE RAVEN FRAMEWORK FOR DYNAMIC PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS

The RAVEN code has been under development at the Idaho National Laboratory since 2012. Its main goal is to create a multi-purpose platform for the deploying of all the capabilities needed for Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA), Uncertainty Quantification (UQ), data mining analysis and optimization studies. RAVEN has demonstrated a good level of maturity in terms of state-of-art and advanced analysis methodologies. In the past year the RAVEN code has been released as open-source project and is available to download (raven.inl.gov) free of charge. The main subject of this paper is to present a new system within the RAVEN framework to drastically accelerate PRA and UQ analysis using acceleration schemes based on surrogate modeling. This system is based on the heavy usage of surrogate modeling and artificial intelligence algorithms, able to emulate the response of a physical system in closed domains (domains where the surrogate models have been constructed from). The aim of this paper is to show to the community how the employment of surrogate modeling techniques can be a viable solution for the current and future challenges in terms of PRA, UQ and Safety Margins characterizations. In addition, in this manuscript it is presented the construction of a RAVEN new entity named “HybridModel” that is aimed to switch between a high-fidelity code and its linked surrogate, accelerating the PRA and UQ processes without largely reducing the accuracy of the results of the analyses. All these new capabilities will be shown with an application example about a Station Black Out scenario for a prototypical Pressurized Water Reactor (modeled with RELAP5-3D).

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2018

AUTOMATIC LIMIT SURFACE SEARCH FOR PWR TRANSIENTS BY RELAP5-3D/RAVEN CODES

Deterministic safety analysis of nuclear power plants can be improved by applying modern algorithms and codes exploiting machine learning and parallel computing. In this paper we show the application of some of these advanced methodologies for the determination of limit surfaces. A limit surface is an n-dimensional surface describing the plant status, e.g. identifying, as function of selected plant parameters, the boundaries between failed and safe conditions for the core fuel. Using the RELAP5-3D system thermal-hydraulic code coupled to the RAVEN statistical-analysis code, we show how to apply machine-learning algorithms (near-neighbor, support-vector machine, etc.) for determining relevant limit surfaces for PWR station-blackout and loss of offsite power. As a first step, a set of training simulations is run to sample the nuclear power plant responses. Those calculations are used to train a Reduced-Order-Model (ROM), which RAVEN then uses for determining an approximated limit surface. Verification of the guessed limit surface is then automatically performed and calculation is terminated depending by the chosen convergence criteria. The combination of High Performance Computing (HPC) and ROMs allow a remarkable reduction of the time required for the surface determination. RAVEN performs also the automatic data collection of the output of the numerous runs, thus easing the workload of the safety analyst. Finally, using RAVEN “Ensamble Forward” sampling technique, we show how to inform the limit surface calculations with some of the code and input uncertainties.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2017

DYNAMIC PRA OF A MULTI-UNIT PLANT

Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) methods couple stochastic methods (e.g., RAVEN, ADAPT, ADS, MCDET) with safety analysis codes (RELAP5-3D, MELCOR, MAAP) to determine risk associated to complex systems such as nuclear plants. Compared to classical PRA methods, which are based on static logic structures (e.g., Event-Trees, Fault-Trees), they can evaluate with higher resolution the safety impact of timing and sequencing of events on the accident progression. Recently, special attention has been given to nuclear plants which consist of multiple units and, in particular, on the safety impact of system dependencies, shared systems and common resources on core damage frequencies. In the literature, while classical PRA methods have been employed to model multi-unit plants, Dynamic PRA methods have never been applied to analyze a full multi-unit model. This paper presents a PRA analysis of a multi-unit plant using Dynamic PRA methods. We employ RAVEN as stochastic method coupled with RELAP5-3D. The plant under consideration consists of the three units and their associated spent fuel pools (SFPs). The studied initiating event is a seismic induced station blackout event. We will describe in detail how the multi-unit plant has been constructed and, in particular, how unit dependencies and shared resources are modeled.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2017

Status Report on Modelling and Simulation Capabilities for Nuclear-Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems

This report summarizes the current status of the modeling and simulation capabilities developed for the economic assessment of Nuclear-Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems (N-R HES). The increasing penetration of variable renewables is altering the profile of the net demand, with which the other generators on the grid have to cope. N-R HES analyses are being conducted to determine the potential feasibility of mitigating the resultant volatility in the net electricity demand by adding industrial processes that utilize either thermal or electrical energy as stabilizing loads. This coordination of energy generators and users is proposed to mitigate the increase in electricity cost and cost volatility through the production of a saleable commodity. Overall, the financial performance of a system that is comprised of peaking units (i.e. gas turbine), baseload supply (i.e. nuclear power plant), and an industrial process (e.g. hydrogen plant) should be optimized under the constraint of satisfying an electricity demand profile with a certain level of variable renewable (wind) penetration. The optimization should entail both the sizing of the components/subsystems that comprise the system and the optimal dispatch strategy (output at any given moment in time from the different subsystems). Some of the capabilities here described have been reported separately in [1, 2, 3]. The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the improvement and extension of those capabilities and to illustrate their integrated application in the economic assessment of N-R HES.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2017

Assembling Multiple Models Within the RAVEN Framework

RAVEN (Risk Analysis Virtual Environment) is an INL-developed software tool that can be used to identify and increase the safety margin in complex systems. As a generic software framework, RAVEN is designed to perform parametric and probabilistic analysis based on the response of complex system codes. RAVEN is capable of investigating the system response as well as the input space using Monte Carlo, Grid, or Latin Hyper Cube sampling schemes, but its strength is focused toward system feature discovery, such as limit surfaces, separating regions of the input space leading to system failure, using dynamic supervised learning techniques. RAVEN is currently able to construct multi-targets Reduced Order Models (ROMs), which are aimed to represent the response of a system (in a fixed configuration) for multiple Figures of Merits (FOMs) and time-dependent ROMs. These capabilities represent the initial steps for a larger implementation about the interaction of multiple models. In fact, in several cases, multiple models need to interface with each other since the initial conditions of one are dependent on the outcomes of another. To better understand the problem that here is solved, it is useful to consider a simple example: The following problem is considered: a weather forecast simulation code 'a' is used to compute the external (i.e. ambient) temperature in a certain location. A second model 'b' is inquired to compute the average temperature in a room having as boundary condition, among several others, the external ambient temperature. The response of the model 'b' depends on the outcome of the model 'a'. The reported example is only aimed to illustrate the reason why the creation of a framework to make interact different models is a key development for the advancement of RAVEN as a comprehensive calculation flow driver. Before reporting how the ensemble-models have been implemented, it is necessary to briefly describe the representative Model 'entities' that are available in RAVEN.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2017

Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program External review of Risk Analysis and Virtual Environment (RAVEN) software for RISMC applications

The aim of this report is to describe the outcomes and findings of the review of the Risk Analysis and Virtual ENviroment (RAVEN) code performed by two external entities. In order to assess the code capabilities and maturity level from different prospective, a university (The Ohio State University) and a private company (FPoliSolutions LLC) have been identified for this review. These two groups provided an in-depth review of the RAVEN code – the resulting reviews were positive and included suggestions for potential enhancements to the code.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗