Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Rampy, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Rampy, J. M..

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1973

Space shuttle (ATP configuration) abort staging investigation

A wind tunnel test conducted in a 14-inch trisonic wind tunnel to determine the force and moment characteristics of the ATP Orbiter and modified ATP External Tank/SRB combination during abort staging conditions is discussed. Six component aerodynamic force and moment data were recorded for the orbiter and ET/SRB combination. Pitch polars were obtained for an angle of attack range from minus 10 to plus 10 degrees and orbiter incidence angles (orbiter relative to the ET/SRB combination) of 0 and 2 degrees. A limited amount of yaw data were obtained at 0 degree angle of attack and beta range from minus 10 to plus 10 degrees. In addition, orbiter pitch control effectiveness was determined at several grid points. These force and moment data were obtained for Mach numbers of 0.9, 1.2 and 2.0.

Rampy, J. M.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Space shuttle: Aerodynamic characteristics of a 162-inch diameter solid rocket booster with and without strakes

Tests conducted at NASA-Langley have shown that a small flap or strake can generate a significant amount of lift on a circular cylinder with large cross flow. If strakes are placed on the opposite sides and ends on a circular body, a moment will be produced about the center of mass of the body. The purpose of this test was to determine the static-aerodynamic forces and moments of a 162-inch diameter SRB (PRR) with and without strakes. The total angle-of-attack range of the SRB test was from -10 to 190 degrees. Model roll angles were 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees with some intermediate angles. The Mach range was from 0.6 to 3.48. The 0.00494 scale model was designated as MSFC No. 449.

Johnson, J. D.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Space shuttle: Preliminary pressure distributions on the 049 orbiter, orbiter in presence of H/O tank and orbiter in launch configuration

The 049 orbiter and launch configurations were tested in a trisonic wind tunnel to obtain preliminary loads information on the orbiter alone, orbiter in presence of the H/O tank and orbiter in the full launch configuration. The orbiter consisted of the baseline 049 double-delta wing, twin vertical stabilizers, seven degrees of dihedral and included abort rockets. The orbiter was mounted at minus 1.50 degree of incidence (fuselage centerline relative to H/O tank centerline) in the launch configuration. The solid rocket motors were mounted at a radial location of 21 degrees from the horizontal centerline of the H/O tank. The test was conducted over a Mach number range of 0.6 to 4.96. Nominal angle of attack and angle of sideslip ranges of minus 6 to plus 6 degrees were tested. In addition, the orbiter alone was tested over an angle of attack range of minus 6 to plus 26 degrees.

Hamilton, J. T.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Space shuttle: Pressure investigation of a space shuttle launch configuration consisting of a delta-wing orbiter and a swept-wing booster with canard and tip fans (M equals 0.6 to 1.3). Volume 1, part A: Booster data

Wind tunnel tests to determine the pressure distribution on a space shuttle launch configuration consisting of a delta wing orbiter and a swept wing booster with canard and tip fins were conducted. Pressure data were obtained for the combined orbiter and booster and for the booster alone at Mach numbers from 0.6 to 1.3, angles of attack from minus 8 degrees to plus 10 degrees, and sideslip angles from minus 6 degrees to plus 6 degrees. Pressure data were also obtained for the booster alone without canard at Mach numbers of 0.9 and 1.1. The pressure taps were distributed primarily over the booster upper surface and the orbiter lower surface.

Rampy, J. M.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Space shuttle: A comparison of wind tunnel facility data on the Grumman H-33 delta winged orbiter

A comparison of longitudinal and lateral directional stability and control characteristics of the Phase B Grumman H-33 orbiter configuration obtained from 6 tests conducted in 4 different facilities is presented. The H-33 orbiter configuration does not include drop tanks. Slope data are used as the medium for comparison. The slope data were computed using the SADSAC system and have been reduced to a common reference system. Data used for comparison were selected based on common configurations wherever possible. Where direct configuration comparisons were not possible, the parameters selected for comparison are regarded as insensitive to the noted differences. Factors considered in comparing the various data were scaling effects, balance operating ranges, balance sensitivities and control deflection accuracies. All factors considered, the comparison among data obtained from the various facilities is excellent. The minor differences in stability and control characteristics are well within the accuracy band of preliminary design model construction specifications.

Gyorfi, R. A.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Space shuttle abort separation pressure investigation. Volume 1, Part A: Booster data at Mach 5

Pressure data obtained from a joint Langley Research Center (LaRC)/Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) Space Shuttle about stage separation wind tunnel test are presented. The .00556 scale models of the McDonnell-Douglas orbiter and booster configurations were tested in proximity in Tunnel A of the Von Karman Facility (VKF), Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC). Mach numbers were 5.0, 3.0, and 2.0 and nominal Reynolds numbers were 1.09, 1.60, and 1.74 million per foot, respectively. Pressure data were obtained for the booster upper surface and orbiter lower surface at angles of attack of -10 deg, -5, 0, 5, and 10 deg for zero degrees sideslip. The models were tested at incidence angles of 0 and 5 deg for several separation distances and power conditions. Plug nozzles utilizing air were used to simulate booster and orbiter plumes at various altitudes along a nominal ascent trajectory. Powered conditions were 100, 50, and 0 percent of full power for the orbiter and 100, 50 and 0 percent of full power for the booster. Data were also obtained with the booster canard off in close proximity.

Trimmer, L. L.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Investigation of the McDonnell-Douglas orbiter and booster shuttle models in proximity at Mach numbers 2.0 to 6.0. Volume 7: Proximity data at Mach 4 and 6, interference free and launch vehicle data

Aerodynamic data obtained from a space shuttle abort stage separation wind tunnel test are presented. The .00556 scale models of the orbiter and booster configuration were tested in close proximity using dual balances during the time period of April 21 to April 27 1971. Data were obtained for both booster and orbiter over an angle of attack range from -10 to 10 deg for zero degree sideslip angle. The models were tested at several relative incidence angles and separation distances and power conditions. Plug nozzles utilizing air were used to simulate booster and orbiter plumes at various altitudes along a nominal ascent trajectory. Powered conditions were 100, 50, 25 and 0 percent of full power for the orbiter and 100, 50 and 0 percent of full power for the booster. Pitch control effectiveness data were obtained for both booster and orbiter with power on and off. In addition, launch vehicle data with and without booster power were obtained utilizing a single balance in the booster model. Data were also obtained with the booster canard off in close proximity and for the launch configuration.

Trimmer, L. L.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Abort separation of the shuttle

A sensitivity analysis of the factors which affect a successful abort maneuver following a space shuttle launching is presented. Wind tunnel tests were conducted using optimum simulation techniques and data acquisition procedures. Static stability, dynamic stability, and local loads were investigated. It is concluded that parallel abort separation of the space shuttle components is possible at both high and low dynamic pressures. Successful separation is dependent upon configuration, Mach number, rocket exhaust impingement and relative position and attitude of the stages.

Decker, J. P.↗