Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Reinovsky, Robert Emil

Publications and source records attributed to Reinovsky, Robert Emil.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Multi-Probe Radiography: For 2035 and Beyond

The Multi-Probe Radiography Project is investigating the use of multiple species of probe beams to provide more information from a radiography. Contextual radiographic, source, and measurements information is being provided through a series of four workshops at Los Alamos National Laboratory. The third workshop on Accelerator and Pulsed Power Technology is summarized in this report. The state of the large NNSA facilities such as Scorpius, DARHT, pRad, and Cygnus are presented. Future enhancements and innovative upgrades are also discussed.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Mitigation and characterization of crosstalk between laser-driven radiography sources

Radiography with multiple probe species offers the potential to extract additional information about a given object as compared to radiography with a single probe species. Notably, the flexibility for high-power, short-pulse lasers to accelerate a variety of particle species makes laser-driven sources an attractive option to achieve multi-probe radiography. However, crosstalk produced by each of laser-driven source may be responsible for substantial backgrounds on detectors, becoming a significant barrier to achieving simultaneous radiography. In this work, we describe measurements of and mitigation strategies against crosstalk between laser-driven radiography sources in experiments at the OMEGA EP laser.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗
DOE OSTI2024

Multi-Probe 24A: Post shot Data and Analysis

The Multi-Probe 24A experiments took place on the Omega EP laser in November 2023. The experiments consisted of shots alternating between Omega EP’s two short-pulse laser beams to generate proton and deuteron ion beams from a range of film thicknesses, and x-ray sources from the established CPC+Ta wire targets. The backlighter was used for ion acceleration in the pitcher series, in which deuteron and proton beams characterized as a function of CD film thickness to develop a pitcher for a pitcher-catcher neutron radiographic source, while also characterizing electrons and x-rays emitted perpendicular to the target (i.e. Crosstalk for sidelighter-driven x-ray beams). The sidelighter was used for electron acceleration in the x-ray series, in which the electron acceleration and subsequent x-rays was characterized from the CPC+Ta wire targets and radiography was conducted with and without electro-magnetic electron defection. For the pitcher series, we found that at 500 J and 0.7 ps the 700-800 nm CD films yielded the greatest number and highest energy for both protons and deuterons. For the x-ray series, results demonstrated: a significant number of <100 keV x-rays are produced within the glue that fills the CPC cone, on-axis electron signal from the x-ray targets produce electrons resolvable up to ~10 MeV, and electron deflection (using MIFEDS) has a notable effect radiograph on noise reduction.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Multi-Probe 24A Pre-Shot report

The Multi-Probe Radiography campaign will field a full day of experiments at the Omega EP laser facility. The day consists of shots alternating between Omega EP’s two short-pulse laser beams. The Backlighter beam will generate proton and deuteron beams from 500-800nm CH/CD film targets, and the Sidelighter beam will accelerate electrons to generate x-rays from 0.5mm x 25-50µm Ø Ta wire targets attached to Compound Parabolic Concentrator (CPC) cones. The ion beams shots will optimize CD foil thickness (maximizing ion energy/yield) for the transparency regime for use as the pitcher in a pitcher catcher neutron-generation platform. Several shots will include a LiF catcher within the NTA and this feeds into future neutron radiography work. X-ray shots will be used to characterize the platform established in FY2020B via measurement of electron spectra with and without the Ta wire, and radiography will be conducted at varying laser energies. This will validate PIC electron acceleration modeling while also demonstrating potential for using the x-ray platform for imaging of thicker objects.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2022

Multi-Probe 23A Pre-Shot report

The Multi-Probe Radiography campaign will field a full day of experiments at the Omega EP laser facility. The experiments will consist of shots that alternate between Omega EP’s two short-pulse laser beams to generate proton and deuteron beams from a variety of film and foam targets. The proton beam is intended to be used as a radiographic source, while the deuteron beam will be used as the pitcher in a pitcher-catcher neutron-generation concept. For the proton beam, our goal is to characterize the angular distribution and energy spectra of unwanted x-rays that are generated during proton acceleration and were found to be problematic for simultaneous radiography in MP-22A. As part of this primary goal, we will test whether an x-ray shield, XBLK, can be used to prevent these x-rays from impacting other x-ray diagnostics. For the deuteron beam, our primary goal is to characterize the energy spectra and beam profile of deuterons accelerated from CD foils and foams.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Multi-Probe 23A: Post shot Data and Analysis

The Multi-Probe 23A experiments took place on the Omega EP laser in December 2022. The experiments consisted of shots alternating between Omega EP’s two short-pulse laser beams to generate proton and deuteron beams from a variety of film and foam targets. The backlighter was used in the pitcher series, in which deuteron beams were generated to develop a pitcher for a pitcher-catcher neutron radiographic source. The sidelighter was used in the shielding series, in which proton beams was generated, and a metal shield, XBLK, was used to mitigate crosstalk between the proton target and image plates located perpendicularly to the proton beam axis. For the pitcher series, we found that we were able to generate a deuteron beam with CD film, but not CD foam, targets. For the shielding series, we found that 6 mm Al vastly outperformed similar thicknesses of Cu and Ta at mitigating the crosstalk, suggesting that electrons, rather than x-rays, are the primary source of crosstalk.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Overview of the LANL Multi-Probe Radiography Project [Slides]

Future radiographic facilities for the U.S. defense program will be required to provide more information as simulation codes improve in both physics’ fidelity and resolution. A possible approach is to use more types of probe beams in addition to, or instead of X-rays, generated by 20-MeV electron accelerators from a small number of directions. High power short-pulse laser systems can generate beams of protons, neutrons and electrons, as well as X-rays. The cost of these systems is falling rapidly. So, it can be imagined that deploying multiple short-pulse lasers along with other, more traditional probes, will become feasible. In this project, we are following three paths to determine if such an approach will succeed for cm-scale objects. The first is an experimental one to determine if the presence of multiple short-pulse probes cause interference with each other, especially while radiographing dynamic objects. The second leg of this project is to determine if having multiple types of probes really does give more information on composition. Finally, an overall assessment of the viability of this approach will be made. Examples from recent experiments at the Omega EP laser will be presented. The initial approach to evaluating radiographs with multiple probes using the Bayesian Inference Engine (BIE) also will be given.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
DOE OSTI2022

Multi-Probe 22A: Post shot Data and Analysis

The Multi-Probe 22A experiments took place on the Omega EP laser in March 2022. The goal was to discover issues with simultaneous x-ray and proton radiography of static and dynamic test objects. The x-ray and proton probes were generated by short-pulse laser-matter interactions. Significant crosstalk between the proton beam and x-ray detector was observed. Several static radiographs were made, including a set of proton images made with different laser energies. No dynamic objects were radiographed.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

High-yield and high-angular-fluence neutron generation from deuterons accelerated by laser-driven collisionless shock

Since a bright collimated neutron source is an essential tool for global security missions and fundamental scientific research. In this paper, we study a compact high-yield and high-angular-fluence neutron source particularly suitable for high-energy neutron applications utilizing the breakup reaction of laser-driven deuterons in a 9 Be converter. The neutron generation scaling from such a reaction is used to guide the choice and optimization of the acceleration process for bulk ions in a low density CD 2 foam. In particular, the collisionless shock acceleration mechanism is exploited with proper choice in the laser and target parameter space to accelerate these ions toward energies above the temperature of the distribution. Particle-in-cell and Monte Carlo simulations are coupled here to investigate this concept and possible adverse effects as well as the contribution from the surface ions accelerated and the optimal converter design. The simulation results indicated that our design can be a practical approach to increase both the neutron yield and angular fluence of laser-driven neutron sources, reaching >10 11 neutron/pulse (or >10 8 neutron/J) and >10 11 neutron/sr (or >10 8 neutron/sr/J) with present-day kJ-class high-power lasers. Such developments will advance fundamental neutron science, high precision radiography, and other global security applications with laser-driven sources.

72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS↗
DOE OSTI2020

(U) PRAD0697 & PRAD0698: Complex Loading of CeO₂ Powder

Cerium(IV) oxide (CeO₂) powder is shock compressed using the Precision High Energy-density Liner Implosion eXperiment (PHELIX) platform. Experimental results are compared against several modeling approaches. Compaction behavior is best captured with a P-∝ model, which calculates CeO₂ powder bulk densities within 80-99% of experimental values but overpredicts densi cation at the cylindrical target's outer radius and center by up to 20%. Preliminary calculations suggest that accuracy could be increased with the inclusion of a coupled strength model. Several common computational modeling approaches for the shock compression response of granular materials and the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) force upon the impactor/liner in pulsed power compression experiments are investigated and analyzed for their validity. The Bi-linear Ramp, P-∝ PACXP, and P-∝ Menikoff-Kober continuum compaction models are calibrated to planar impact Hugoniot data for CeO₂ powder and used to predict the powder's shock compaction response under non-planar shock wave compression. MHD calculations of the PHELIX pulsed power driver are performed using an idealized resistor-inductor-capacitor (RLC) circuit calibrated to previous experiments. All simulations are performed using the LANL code FLAG. Two validation experiments are computationally designed using the calibrated compaction and circuit models, executed using the PHELIX platform on CeO₂ targets with initial porous densities of 3.95 and 4.03 g/cm³, measured with proton radiography, and analyzed against the model predictions. The two P-∝ models more accurately describe CeO₂ powder densi cation than the Bi-linear Ramp model. However, the two P-∝ models overpredict bulk density of the shock compressed CeO₂ powder by up to 20% when the appropriate impact velocities are applied. MHD calculations for both validation experiments underpredict liner impact velocities by 4-11% when using the idealized RLC circuit model calibrated to previous experiments. Compensating underpredictions of impact velocity and overpredictions of powder densication lead to a false accuracy in pre-shot calculations compared to experimental data. To improve correlation between simulations and experiments, the following improvements are suggested: 1. A coupled strength model for CeO₂ powder that updates strength as a function of porosity and applied stress. 2. An improved MHD circuit model that more accurately captures the PHELIX machine.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2017

PHELIX Crenulation 2 and 3 Flash Report

This report documents the execution of the PHELIX driven Crenulation 2 and 3 at LANSCE proton radiography experiments in FY17 in support of the LANL Science Campaign-1 L2 Milestone (#5721). It should be noted that LANL Science Campaign 3 also supports the PHELIX at pRad efforts.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2016

Crenulation-­1 Flash Report

We briefly report on the first of PHELIX driven Crenulation experiments diagnosed with proton radiography. PHELIX is a 300 kJ capacitor bank located at the LANL LANSCE pRad facility. It is capable of delivering a 4 MA, 10 us current pulse to a low inductance cylindrical load. Using a magnetically driven cylindrical liner, we have shocked a concentric tin cylindrical shell to melt-on-release and compared to theory and calculations. The inner surface of the tin cylinder has three sectors of single-mode perturbations, which are subject to Richtmyer-Meshkov Instability (RMI). Recent theoretical work on the EOS of tin has modified both the Hugoniot and the isentropes for release into various states in tabular data. The new multiphase EOS for tin, SESAME 2161, includes the beta and gamma solid phases as well as a liquid phase. It predicts a lower pressure boundary for release to pure solid (~20 GPa) and a higher pressure boundary for release to pure liquid (~35 GPa) than the existing SESAME 2160 table.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2016

Investigation of Surface Phenomena in Shocked Tin in Converging Geometry

There is a great interest in RMI as source of ejecta from metal shells. Previous experiments have explored wavelength amplitude (kA) variation but they have a small range of drive pressures and are in planer geometry. Simulations, both MD and hydro, have explored RMI in planer geometry. The ejecta source model from RMI is an area of active algorithm and code development in ASCI-IC Lagrangian Applications Project. PHELIX offers precise, reproducible variable driver for Hydro and material physics diagnoses with proton radiography.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2016

Investigation of Surface Phenomena in Shocked Tin in Converging Geometry

There is great interest in the behavior of the free surface of tin under shock loading. While it is known that meso-scale surface imperfections can seed the Richtmyer- Meshkov Instability (RMI) for a surface that is melted on release, much less is known about a tin surface that is solid, but plastically deforming. Here material properties such as shear and yield strength come into play especially in converging geometry. Previous experiments have been driven by direct contact HE. Usually a thin, flat target coupon is fielded with various single-mode, sinusoidal, machined, profiles on the free surface. The free surface is adjacent to either vacuum or an inert receiver gas. Most of these previous driver/target configurations have been nominal planer geometry. With modern HE it has been straightforward to shock tin into melt on release. However it has been challenging to achieve a low enough pressure for solid state on release. Here we propose to extend the existing base of knowledge to include the behavior of the free surface of tin in cylindrical converging geometry. By shock loading a cylindrical tin shell with a magnetically driven cylindrical liner impactor, the free surface evolution can be diagnosed with proton radiography. With the PHELIX capacitor bank, the drive can easily be varied to span the pressure range to achieve solid, mixed, and liquid states on release. A conceptual cylindrical liner and target is shown in Figure 1.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗