Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Reznicek, Evan P.

Publications and source records attributed to Reznicek, Evan P..

Hydrogen Blending into Natural Gas Pipeline Infrastructure: Review of the State of Technology

Hydrogen is an energy carrier that could play an important role in reducing emissions associated with difficult-to-decarbonize sectors including peaking and load-following electricity and industrial heating. Blending hydrogen into the natural gas pipelines has been proposed as an approach for achieving near-term emissions reductions and early-market access for hydrogen technologies such as electrolyzers. Numerous challenges and uncertainties complicate this approach to natural gas decarbonization, however, and this review summarizes current research on the material, economic, and operational factors that must be considered for hydrogen blending. First, this review explores previous research regarding the effects of blending hydrogen on gas mixture fluid and thermodynamic properties, pipeline materials and equipment performance within transmission and distribution networks, and supporting facilities such as underground storage and end-use hydrogen separation. We also investigate and summarize studies that developed mathematical models of natural gas pipeline networks with hydrogen blending, and the operational and techno-economic findings of these network studies. Finally, we discuss notable hydrogen blending demonstrations and their key outcomes. Many blending demonstrations internationally have proven that low hydrogen percentage blending is feasible under very specific scenarios with limited end-usage applications on both high-pressure transmission lines and low-pressure distribution lines. This report summarizes findings from literature into key areas of consensus and disagreement. Research gaps and disagreements between the literature are highlighted to provide directions for future hydrogen blending research.

03 NATURAL GAS↗

Techno-economic analysis of long-duration energy storage and flexible power generation technologies to support high-variable renewable energy grids

As variable renewable energy penetration increases beyond 80%, clean power systems will require long-duration energy storage or flexible, low-carbon generation. Here, we provide a detailed techno-economic evaluation and uncertainty analysis of applicable technologies and identify challenges and opportunities to support electric grid planning. We show that for a 120-h storage duration rating, hydrogen systems with geologic storage and natural gas with carbon capture are the least-cost low-carbon technologies for both current and future capital costs. These results are robust to uncertainty for the future capital cost scenario, but adiabatic compressed air and pumped thermal storage could be the least-cost technologies in the current capital cost scenario under uncertainty. Finally, we present a new storage system using heavy-duty vehicle fuel cells that could reduce the levelized cost of energy by 13%–20% compared with the best previously considered storage technology and, thus, could help enable very high (>80%) renewable energy grids.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Simulation of the supercritical CO 2 recompression Brayton power cycle with a high-temperature regenerator

The supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO 2 ) recompression Brayton cycle promises higher efficiency and lower capital cost than traditional steam Rankine power cycles. However, achieving high efficiency requires large, highly effective recuperators. Regenerators may be a low-cost alternative to printed circuit and micro-tube heat exchangers for recuperation in sCO 2 power cycles. Regenerators are a periodic heat exchanger in which thermal energy is extracted from the hot stream, stored in solid media, and then released to the cold stream at a later time. Fixed bed regenerators with valves to direct fluid are the preferred method for implementing regenerators in power cycles, but the inherently transient nature of these systems has not been characterized for this application. This study presents the simulation of a high-temperature regenerator within a 10 MWe sCO 2 recompression Brayton cycle. A transient, one-dimensional regenerator model presented in a previous study is used to simulate the regenerator. Dynamic heat exchanger models are also developed for the precooler, low-temperature recuperator, and primary heat exchanger, and the compressors and the turbine are modeled with off-design performance maps. We assess two regenerator-valve design options; one for fast switching, and one for reduced flow rate fluctuations. System simulation finds that both designs see significant fluctuations in turbomachinery flow rate, turbomachinery and system power, and regenerator discharge process outlet temperature. While designing the regenerator-valve subsystem for lower fluctuations is possible, the regenerator cold discharge temperature and net power still fluctuate by ±77.6°C and 6%, respectively. Increasing buffer volume is not effective at sufficiently reducing these fluctuations, but adding a packed bed in between the regenerator and the primary heat exchanger can reduce regenerator discharge process outlet temperature fluctuations to 6.4°C. Further reductions could be possible by increasing the size of this packed bed.

42 ENGINEERING↗

One-dimensional, transient modeling of a fixed-bed regenerator as a replacement for recuperators in supercritical CO 2 power cycles

Fixed-bed regenerators may be a low cost alternative to recuperators for supercritical CO 2 power cycles. However, the transient nature of regenerators operating in sCO 2 power cycles has not been previously characterized. This study details a one-dimensional, transient model of a fixed-bed regenerator that captures phenomena such as local fluid properties and heat transfer coefficients, entrained fluid heat capacity, and the effects of conservation of mass during process switching. The model is validated with experimental results of a 10 kWth regenerator. This comparison shows that the model predicts temperature as a function of both time and space exceptionally well. The model predicts effectiveness, heat transfer, and discharge temperatures within 5%, and predicts pressure drop and fluid carryover within 10%. This model could be used in future studies to simulate regenerators within a supercritical CO 2 power cycle.

30 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION↗

On-Road Heavy-Duty Low-NOx Technology Cost Study

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducted a cost analysis for emission control technologies under contract to the California Air Resources Board (CARB). CARB sought incremental cost analysis for emission control technologies for on-road heavy-duty (HD) engines, used in vehicle greater than 14,000 pounds (lbs) gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) to achieve oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions rates significantly lower than those required by current emissions standards. Specifically, incremental costs (without any retail price mark-up) were estimated for representative diesel, natural gas, and gasoline engine and emission aftertreatment systems that were selected to represent potential technology packages that could achieve 0.02 grams per brake horsepower hour (g/bhp-hr) NOx on certification test cycles, including a proposed updated certification test cycle that includes additional low load operating conditions. NREL surveyed stakeholders including industry association groups, Tier 1 suppliers, and engine original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to estimate incremental direct and indirect costs. Incremental costs were considered for current engine full useful life (FUL) definitions, as well as with proposed increased FUL and warranty period. The incremental costs were subsequently incorporated in life-cycle cost analyses examining the incremental engine and aftertreatment costs along with life-cycle costs over the various engine FUL scenarios. Life-cycle costs analysis included the incremental upfront cost, fuel consumption changes (changes in fuel economy), diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) consumption changes, and the maximum FUL of the aftertreatment package (major overhaul intervals).

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗