Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Ricciuto, Daniel M

Publications and source records attributed to Ricciuto, Daniel M.

7 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

ILAMBv2.7 benchmarking results comparing E3SMv2.1 land-atmosphere coupled (BGCv2LNDATM) and stand alone land (ELM) simulations with CMIP6 emission driven historical simulations

This dataset contains land model benchmarking results for the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 2.1 (E3SMv2.1), including outputs from both coupled biogeochemistry simulations and stand-alone land model simulations. These results are compared against several emission-driven historical simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Benchmarking was conducted using the International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMB) package, version 2.7 (ILAMBv2.7). CMIP6 model outputs were sourced from the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF), while the E3SMv2.1 results were derived from raw model outputs. These outputs underwent processing steps such as time serialization, conservative regridding, and data standardization to ensure comparability. For spatial interpolation, the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF) tool, ESMF_RegridWeightGen, was employed to generate regridding weights, enabling the transformation of E3SM’s native cubed-sphere grid to a regular latitude-longitude grid.

Feng, Sha [PNNL]↗
DOE OSTI2020

Global gross primary production simulated by three terrestrial biosphere models to analyse smoothing of limiting rates

Processed global terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) from three terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs). Two simulations were run with each model, one that selects the rate limiting process of photosynthesis based on the minimum of the potential rates (following Farquhar et al. 1980) and the other that uses quadratic smoothing between the potential rates (following Collatz et al. 1991). The three TBMs are: 1) the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) land model (ELM) (release: v1.1.0) (Burrows et al., 2020), a coupled carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus model with sun/shade big-leaf canopy photosynthesis scaling. 2) The Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES, tag: sci.1.30.0_api.8.0.0) (Koven et al., 2019), coupled with the Community Land Model (CLM, version 5; Lawrence et al., 2019), a carbon-only vegetation demography model with multi-leaf and multi-canopy layers for scaling photosynthesis, and with a leaf area index (LAI) optimisation scheme. 3) The Sheffield Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (SDGVM, tag: Walkeretal2020_GCB), a carbon-only model with multi-leaf-layer canopy photosynthesis scaling and also with an LAI optimisation scheme (Walker et al., 2017; Woodward & Lomas, 2004). These data were generated to evaluate the effect of Collatz smoothing of limiting rates on simulated GPP across a range of terrestrial biosphere models. Analysis of results can be found in Walker et al. (2020). This dataset is comprised of R scripts to process data and produce figures and .RDS files, a binary format specific to R and read with the 'readRDS' function.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2012

Sensitivity of Surface Flux Simulations to Hydrologic Parameters Based on an Uncertainty Quantification Framework Applied to the Community Land Model

Uncertainties in hydrologic parameters could have significant impacts on the simulated water and energy fluxes and land surface states, which will in turn affect atmospheric processes and the carbon cycle. Quantifying such uncertainties is an important step toward better understanding and quantification of uncertainty of integrated earth system models. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework to analyze sensitivity of simulated surface fluxes to selected hydrologic parameters in the Community Land Model (CLM4) through forward modeling. Thirteen flux tower footprints spanning a wide range of climate and site conditions were selected to perform sensitivity analyses by perturbing the parameters identified. In the UQ framework, prior information about the parameters was used to quantify the input uncertainty using the Minimum-Relative-Entropy approach. The quasi-Monte Carlo approach was applied to generate samples of parameters on the basis of the prior pdfs. Simulations corresponding to sampled parameter sets were used to generate response curves and response surfaces and statistical tests were used to rank the significance of the parameters for output responses including latent (LH) and sensible heat (SH) fluxes. Overall, the CLM4 simulated LH and SH show the largest sensitivity to subsurface runoff generation parameters. However, study sites with deep root vegetation are also affected by surface runoff parameters, while sites with shallow root zones are also sensitive to the vadose zone soil water parameters. Generally, sites with finer soil texture and shallower rooting systems tend to have larger sensitivity of outputs to the parameters. Our results suggest the necessity of and possible ways for parameter inversion/calibration using available measurements of latent/sensible heat fluxes to obtain the optimal parameter set for CLM4. This study also provided guidance on reduction of parameter set dimensionality and parameter calibration framework design for CLM4 and other land surface models under different hydrologic and climatic regimes.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2012

Practical Application of Parallel Coordinates for Climate Model Analysis

The determination of relationships between climate variables and the identification of the most significant associations between them in various geographic regions is an important aspect of climate model evaluation. The EDEN visual analytics toolkit has been developed to aid such analysis by facilitating the assessment of multiple variables with respect to the amount of variability that can be attributed to specific other variables. EDEN harnesses the parallel coordinates visualization technique and is augmented with graphical indicators of key descriptive statistics. A case study is presented in which the focus on the Harvard Forest site (42.5378N Lat, 72.1715W Lon) and the Community Land Model Version 4 (CLM4) is evaluated. It is shown that model variables such as land water runoff are more sensitive to a particular set of environmental variables than a suite of other inputs in the 88 variable analysis conducted. The approach presented here allows climate-domain scientists to focus on the most important variables in the model evaluations.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2011

Evaluating runoff simulations from the Community Land Model 4.0 using observations from flux towers and a mountainous watershed

Previous studies using the Community Land Model (CLM) focused on simulating landatmosphere interactions and water balance at continental to global scales, with limited attention paid to its capability for hydrologic simulations at watershed or regional scales. This study evaluates the performance of CLM 4.0 (CLM4) for hydrologic simulations, and explores possible directions of improvement. Specifically, it is found that CLM4 tends to produce unrealistically large temporal variation of runoff for applications at a mountainous catchment in the Northwest United States where subsurface runoff is dominant, as well as at a few flux tower sites. We show that runoff simulations from CLM4 can be improved by: (1) increasing spatial resolution of the land surface representations; (2) calibrating parameter values; (3) replacing the subsurface formulation with a more general nonlinear function; (4) implementing the runoff generation schemes from the Variability Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model. This study also highlights the importance of evaluating both the energy and water fluxes application of land surface models across multiple scales.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2011

Characterizing the performance of ecosystem models across time scales: A spectral analysis of the North American Carbon Program site-level synthesis

Ecosystem models are important tools for diagnosing the carbon cycle and projecting its behavior across space and time. Most assessments of model performance occur at individual temporal scales, but ecosystems respond to drivers at multiple time scales. Spectral methods, such as wavelet analyses, present an alternative approach that enables the identification of the dominant time scales contributing to model performance in the frequency domain. In this study we used wavelet analyses to synthesize the performance of twenty-one ecosystem models at nine eddy-covariance towers as part of the North American Carbon Program's site-level inter-comparison. This study expands upon previous single-site and single-model analyses to determine what patterns of model failure are consistent across a diverse range of models and sites.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗