Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Rios, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Rios, A..

5 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Reply to “Comment on ‘Reexamining the relation between the binding energy of finite nuclei and the equation of state of infinite nuclear matter' ”

In their comment to our paper [1], Bertsch and Stroberg [2] provide three criticisms. Two of these concern the interpretation of our dispersive optical model (DOM) results and their relation to the liquid drop model (LDM) parameters. The third criticism focuses on the potential systematic uncertainties on our DOM results associated with missing three-body contributions. Before addressing these critiques, we want to state that the key message of our paper remains whether or not the DOM results agree with the LDM predictions in the nuclear interior. Here, the key point is that the standard determination of the saturation energy from the LDM is not ideal since the total binding energy has a minimal contribution from the core of the nucleus as pointed out in Figs. 1–3 of our paper.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Reexamining the relation between the binding energy of finite nuclei and the equation of state of infinite nuclear matter

The energy density is calculated in coordinate space for 12 C, 40 Ca, 48 Ca, and 208 Pb using a dispersive optical model constrained by all relevant data including the corresponding energy of the ground state. The energy density of 8 Be is also calculated using the Green’s function Monte-Carlo method employing the Argonne/Urbana two and three-body interactions. The nuclear interior minimally contributes to the total binding energy due to the 4πr 2 phase space factor. Thus, the volume contribution to the energy in the interior is not well constrained. The dispersive-optical-model energy densities are in good agreement with ab initio self-consistent Green’s function calculations of infinite nuclear matter restricted to treat only short-range and tensor correlations. These results call into question the degree to which the equation of state for nuclear matter is constrained by the empirical mass formula. In particular, the results in this work indicate that saturated nuclear matter does not require the canonical value of 16 MeV binding per particle but only about 13-14 MeV when the interior of 208 Pb is considered.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
NASA NTRS1980

As-built design specification of the data order processor ORDHDT

A description and subroutine documentation of the data order processor, ORHDT is given. As part of the LANDSAT imagery verification and extraction system, ORDHT creates a computer tape containing the AgRISTARS requirements for LANDSAT data to be ordered from Goddard Space Flight Center. A brief description of hardware requirements is also included.

Rios, A.↗