Search NASAโŒ• Search

Engineering topics

Robert E. Bartels

Publications and source records attributed to Robert E. Bartels.

9 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroservoelastic Control Law Development for the Integrated Adaptive Wing Technology Maturation Wind-Tunnel Test

In this paper, a linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) regulator was applied to a computational aeroservoelastic (ASE) model of the Integrated Adaptive Wing Technology Maturation (IAWTM) wind-tunnel model to demonstrate its effectiveness for active flutter suppression. The aerodynamics within this computational ASE model were solved using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations; the structural dynamics of the model were solved using modal analysis. This RANS-based ASE model was used as the plant for the LQG regulator. The Kalman filter and controller used within the LQG regulator were derived from a reduced-order model (ROM) of the RANS-based ASE model. This ROM-based ASE model was generated using system identification techniques. It was shown that the Kalman filter adequately predicted important states of the plant, and that LQG regulator successfully stabilized an aeroelastically unstable plant without exceeding reasonable control surface limitations. All of this was demonstrated using simulation data, and the methods presented here appear feasible for use in the upcoming IAWTM wind-tunnel tests.

Josiah M. Waiteโ†—
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Trim Drag Optimization of Mach 0.745 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft with Variable-Camber Continuous Trailing-Edge Flap

This paper presents an aeroelastic trim drag optimization study of the Mach 0.745 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) aircraft with the Variable-Camber Continuous Trailing-Edge Flap (VCCTEF). An aero-structural analysis solver VSPAERO with transonic small disturbance, integral boundary-layer, and wing-strut interference corrections coupled to finite-element code BEAM3D is developed to provide a rapid aircraft aeroelastic performance evaluation. The VSPAERO model has been validated against wind tunnel test data. Aeroelastic trim drag optimization studies are conducted for a VCCTEF configuration with 6-spanwise sections. Three different flight conditions corresponding to Mach 0.745 are selected for the TTBW aircraft aeroelastic trim drag optimization at the design and off-design cruise lift coefficients. The preliminary optimization results show that the TTBW aircraft with the optimized VCCTEF deflection achieves a drag reduction of about 9.1 counts, 5.9 counts, and 11.8 counts corresponding to the lift coefficients 0.68, 0.73, and 0.78, respectively. A high-fidelity CFD solver FUN3D is used to validate the aeroelastic trim drag optimization.

Aeroelastic trim dragโ†—
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Modeling and CFD Simulation of Wind-Tunnel Scale Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model

This paper presents an aeroelastic modeling and simulation study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind-tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with distributed flaps. A vortex-lattice VSPAERO model of the CRM model is developed. A transonic small disturbance/integral boundary layer correction method is implemented in the VSPAERO model to account for the transonic and viscous flow effects. The structural deformation of the CRM model is calculated using a NASTRAN equivalent beam model. The VSPAERO model is coupled to the NASTRAN equivalent beam model to provide a rapid aero-structural analysis. A validation of the VSPAERO aeroelastic model is conducted by comparing the results to FUN3D CFD aeroelastic simulation results. An aerodynamic database is generated using the developed VSPAERO aeroelastic model for the real-time drag optimization and maneuver load alleviation study of the wind-tunnel scale CRM model.

Aeroelastic Modelingโ†—
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Jig Twist Optimization of Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft

This paper presents a jig twist optimization study of Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) aircraft using FUN3D. The solver has been validated against wind tunnel test data. An aeroelastic model deformation correction method is developed for the wind tunnel model to improve the validation. The flight condition corresponding to Mach 0.8 and design lift coefficient 0.695 is selected for the TTBW aircraft jig twist optimization to reduce the drag coefficient. The static aeroelastic simulation module in FUN3D is used for the aeroelastic simulation. Three different orders of the Chebyshev polynomials are used as shape function to represent the variations of the jig twist distribution along the wing span. The preliminary optimization results show that the Mach 0.8 TTBW aircraft with the optimized jig twist achieves a drag reduction of about 5.7 counts at the design condition when 5 ๐‘กโ„Ž order Chebyshev polynomials are used as shape function.

TTBWโ†—
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Trim Drag Optimization of Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft using High-Lift Devices and Control Surfaces

This paper presents an aeroelastic trim drag optimization study of the Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) aircraft using the High-lift devices and control surfaces. An aero-structural analysis solver VSPAERO with transonic small disturbance, integral boundary-layer, and wing-strut interference corrections coupled to mode shapes computed by NASTRAN using the Galerkin method is developed to provide a rapid aircraft aeroelastic performance evaluation. Three different flight conditions corresponding to Mach 0.8 are selected for the aeroelastic trim drag optimization at the design and off-design cruise lift coefficients. The preliminary optimization results show that the TTBW aircraft with the optimized deflection of the high-lift devices and control surfaces achieves a drag reduction of about 8.2 counts, 6.5 counts, and 9.7 counts corresponding to the lift coefficients 0.661, 0.695, and 0.729, respectively. A high-fidelity CFD solver FUN3D is used to verify the aeroelastic trim drag optimization.

TTBWโ†—
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High Fidelity Adaptively Refined CFD and Reduced Order Models of a High Aspect Ratio Aeroelastic Wing Wind Tunnel Model

Robust adaptive mesh refinement for transonic conditions is one of the most difficult challenges to advancing CFD usage for certification by analysis. Transonic fluid-structure interaction cases represent an even more difficult challenge for adaptive mesh refinement. Production aircraft furthermore have structural models that have gaps and discontinuities that make the interdomain transfer of loads and deflections difficult. This adds to the challenge of adaptive mesh refinement. An initial attempt to create an adaptive mesh refinement process that refines regions of high flow gradient based around the HeldenMesh software is presented. The method is applied to the Integrated Adaptive Wing Technology Maturation (IAWTM) configuration. That has developed an aspect ratio 13.5 wing aeroelastic wind-tunnel model for testing in the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT). The high levels of deformation of this wing make the adaptation of meshes for the static shape difficult and has necessitated some creativity in how to efficiently adapt meshes. A time-domain identification of the unsteady system based on flexible modes using the adapted meshes is performed.

Robert E. Bartelsโ†—
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Numerical Simulation of An Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model with Trailing Edge Mini-Flaps

This paper presents an aeroelastic modeling study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with trailing edge mini-flaps. FUN3D is used for the aeroelastic steady and unsteady simulations at Mach 0.85 and dynamic pressure 230 psf. The aeroelastic simulation results are compared with the in-house developed VSPAERO aeroelastic model results. The incremental aerodynamic coefficients predicted by FUN3D and VSPAERO are close except when the mini-flap deflection angle is 10หš. The control reversal behavior is observed for the wing tip mini-flap. A series of dynamic pressure sweep simulations are performed to determine the control reversal onset point. Unsteady simulation results show that there is no buffet phenomenon observed at angle of attacks 0หš and 2หš when the mini-flap is deflected 10หš. The mini-flap oscillation simulations show the nonlinear behavior appears when the deflection angle is about 4หš.

Mini-flapโ†—
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Simplified Applied Loads of a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Derived from Computational Fluid Dynamics

The transonic truss-braced wing (TTBW) concept is under consideration by the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) project due to its potential to reduce fuel consumption of transport aircraft. To properly evaluate the TTBW concept, detailed structural modeling and subsequent test planning is underway, which requires a simplified set of discrete applied loads that simulate the distributed aerodynamic pressures. Given the unique architecture of the TTBW and its intended operation in the transonic regime, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is the ideal approach to employ to ensure the aerodynamics of this configuration are sufficiently captured. To convert aerodynamic results into input for structural models, application of a data transfer tool, Discrete Data Transfer Between Dissimilar Meshes (DDTBDM), is presented to resolve aerodynamic pressures from CFD into single load vectors at hardpoints along both the wing and the strut. Evaluation of mapping the aerodynamic forces to hardpoints at rib and spar intersections in a structural model is performed, and the results are also compared with a linear static aeroelastic analysis. The structural responses indicate that distributing forces along only the wing and strut forward spars is insufficient for simulating the distributed aerodynamic loads. Adding moments along the forward spars improved the global response of the wing, but the point moments created unrealistic local rotations within the structure. When distributing loads along both the forward and aft spars of the wing and strut, the global response was less sensitive to the inclusion of point moments, which indicated the arrangement of point forces alone was sufficient input for structural design work and testing and provided a more continuous loading profile.

Finite Elementโ†—
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Simplified Applied Loads of a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Derived from Computational Fluid Dynamic

The transonic truss-braced wing (TTBW) concept is under consideration by the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) project due to its potential to reduce fuel consumption of transport aircraft. To properly evaluate the TTBW concept, detailed structural modeling and subsequent test planning is underway, which requires a simplified set of discrete applied loads that simulate the distributed aerodynamic pressures. Given the unique architecture of the TTBW and its intended operation in the transonic regime, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is the ideal approach to employ to ensure the aerodynamics of this configuration are sufficiently captured. To convert aerodynamic results into input for structural models, application of a data transfer tool, Discrete Data Transfer Between Dissimilar Meshes (DDTBDM), is presented to resolve aerodynamic pressures from CFD into single load vectors at hardpoints along both the wing and the strut. Evaluation of mapping the aerodynamic forces to hardpoints at rib and spar intersections in a structural model is performed, and the results are also compared with a linear static aeroelastic analysis. The structural responses indicate that distributing forces along only the wing and strut forward spars is insufficient for simulating the distributed aerodynamic loads. Adding moments along the forward spars improved the global response of the wing, but the point moments created unrealistic local rotations within the structure. When distributing loads along both the forward and aft spars of the wing and strut, the global response was less sensitive to the inclusion of point moments, which indicated the arrangement of point forces alone was sufficient input for structural design work and testing and provided a more continuous loading profile.

Finite Elementโ†—