Engineering topics

Roberts, Thomas

Publications and source records attributed to Roberts, Thomas.

8 records

DOE OSTI2024

Turbo-Turtle v0.12.1

A collection of solid body modeling tools for 2D sketched, 2D axisymmetric, and 3D revolved models. It also contains general purpose meshing and image generation utilities appropriate for any model, not just those created with this package. Implemented for Abaqus and Cubit as backend modeling and meshing software. Orginal implementation targeted Abaqus so most options and descriptions use Abaqus modeling concepts and language. Turbo-Turtle makes a best effort to maintain common behaviors and features across each third-party software’s modeling concepts. As much as possible, the work for each subcommand is performed in Python 3 to minimize solution approach duplication in third-party tools. The third-party scripting interface is only accessed when creating the final tool specific objects and output. The tools contained in this project can be expanded to drive other meshing utilities in the future, as needed by the user community. This project derives its name from the origins as a sphere partitioning utility following the turtle shell (or soccer ball) pattern.s.

Brindley, Kyle↗

DOE OSTI2024

Simulation study of ion beam used to produce Mo-99

An 820 mA CW positive ion source is being developed to produce Mo-99 using the fusion of deuterium and tritium ion beams on a rotating target to produce neutrons for use in the production of radiopharmaceuticals. The ion source consists of an RF plasma source, a multi-aperture extractor, and 300 kV accelerating column. This paper will describe a simulation study of the beam through the extractor grid and the accelerator to the target. The uniformity of beam distribution on the target is an important aspect of the simulation.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Low-energy muon and muonium beam source at Fermilab

We describe a high-efficiency source of muonium that can be transported as a beam in vacuum provides opportunities for fundamental muon and precision physics measurements such as sensitive searches for symmetry violation. Although PSI is currently the world leader, the intense 800-MeV PIP-II linac beam at Fermilab could provide world-class low-energy muon and muonium beams, with unparalleled intensity, driving the next generation of precision muon-based physics experiments at the intensity frontier. However, it is critical to initiate the prerequisite R&D now to prepare for the PIP-II era. A low-energy secondary muon line recently installed in an operating facility (the MeV Test Area, which utilizes the intense 400-MeV Fermilab Linac beam) could support the required R&D, and potentially compete for new physics in the immediate term, if approved. This beamline was developed for μ– and will need to be re-optimized for surface μ+ production and transport, making it also suitable for muon spin rotation physics––a unique research and industrial application for which no U.S. facility exists, and whose facilities are oversubscribed worldwide.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Design of a PIP-II Era Mu2e Experiment

We propose a design of an upgraded Mu2e experiment for the future Fermilab PIP-II era based on the muon collider front end. The consensus is that such an upgrade should provide a factor of 10 increase in the rate of stopping muons in the experimental target. The current Mu2e design is optimized for 8 kW of protons at 8 GeV. The PIP-II upgrade project is a 250-meter-long CW linac capable of accelerating a 2-mA proton beam to a kinetic energy of 800 MeV (total power 1.6 MW). This would significantly improve the Fermilab proton source to enable next-generation intensity frontier experiments. But using this 800 MeV beam poses challenges to the Mu2E experiment. Bright muon beams generated from sources designed for muon collider and neutrino factory facilities have been shown to generate two orders of magnitude more muons per proton than the current Mu2e production target and solenoid. In contrast to the current Mu2e, the muon collider design has forward-production of muons from the target.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Plasma Muon Beam Cooling for HEP

Ionization cooling has the potential to shrink the phase space of a muon beam by a factor of 10⁶ within the muons’ short lifetime (2.2 µs) because the collision frequency in a cooling medium is extremely high compared to conventional beam cooling methods. It has been realized that ionization cooling inherently produces a plasma of free electrons inside the absorber material, and this plasma can have an important effect on the muon beam. In particular, under the right circumstances, it can both improve the rate of cooling and reduce the equilibrium emittance of the beam. This has the potential to improve the performance of muon facilities based on muon cooling; in particular a future muon collider. We describe how this project will integrate Plasma muon beam cooling into both the basic Helical Cooling Channel (HCC) and extreme Parametric-resonance Ionization Cooling (PIC) techniques. This potentially whole new approach to muon cooling has exciting prospects for significantly reduced muon beam emittance.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

Design of a PIP-II Era Mu2e Experiment

We present an alternative Mu2e-II production scheme for the Fermilab PIP-II era based on production schemes we devised for muon-collider and neutrino-factory front ends. Bright muon beams generated from sources designed for muon collider and neutrino factory facilities have been shown to generate two orders of magnitude more muons per proton than the current Mu2e production target and solenoid. In contrast to the current Mu2e, the muon collider design has forward-production of muons from the target. Forward production from 8 GeV protons would include high energy antiprotons, pions and muons, which would provide too much background for the Mu2e system. In contrast, the 800 MeV PIP-II beam does not have sufficient energy to produce antiprotons, and other secondaries will be at a low enough energy that they can be ranged out with an affordable shield of ~ 2 meters of concrete.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Evaluation of Repurposing Archetypal Preventive Radiological/Nuclear Detectors to the Consequence Management Mission

In the first hours or days after an unplanned release of radioactive material to the environment, the radiation detection instruments most widely available to local first responders may be those currently fielded for interdiction missions. This study investigated how such preventative radiological / nuclear detection instruments could perform if repurposed to consequence management missions. A representative sample of three archetypes (body-worn, human carried, and other/large detection volume) encompassed six categories: personal radiation detector, extended range personal radiation detector, personal emergency radiation detector, radio-isotope identification device, human portable detector/backpack, and vehicle mounted large detection volume. Overall 19 models of equipment were included in the study. Laboratory evaluations were designed to assess the capabilities of the instruments in four consequence management missions: exposure rate, integrated exposure, radiation survey, and contamination screening. As applicable, the evaluations included measurement of exposure rate, integrated exposure, overrange response, and angular response. The results were compared to benchmarks from the American National Standards Institute ANSI N42.49A. The performance of the instruments for initial screening for contamination was assessed by an automated radioactive source moving past the detectors at various speeds and distances. The results demonstrate that if the equipment is used in accordance with the mission analysis and categories, and within the original equipment manufacturer specifications, it is possible to achieve sufficient accuracy to estimate and document doses to responders, plan entries into contaminated areas, detect contamination, and protect the public, until such time as outside resources arrive with sufficient numbers of standard health physics instruments and personnel dosimetry to replace the preventative radiological / nuclear detection instruments. Finally, this evaluation campaign was conducted to complement the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report-179 on Guidance for Emergency Response Dosimetry.

46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗

DOE OSTI2017

Evaluation of Preventative Radiological/Nuclear Detector Archetypes to Validate Repurpose to the Consequence Management Mission

In the event of a radiological or nuclear emergency involving a large-scale release of radioactive material, local responders would be the primary means to perform radiation measurements to assess impacts and issue protective action recommendations for the responders and the public. Over the first 24-36 hours, Federal responders and resources will deploy to augment the local efforts, and if necessary, provide extensive radiation monitoring and assessment capabilities coordinated by the Department of Energy-led Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Center and Federal Emergency Management Agency-led Multiagency Coordination Group. Unless Federal resources happen to be deployed at the moment an incident occurs, such as a preventative radiological/nuclear detection mission for a scheduled special event, the local response to an incident will commence and persist for many hours with no on-scene Federal support. For a catastrophic incident, such as a nuclear detonation or severe reactor accident, the local jurisdictions may not have a full range of adequate supplies of health physics instruments and personnel dosimetry. Therefore early in a crisis, the local responders will inevitably conduct their operations with the radiation detection and dosimetry capabilities that they have available until additional resources and support are requested and arrive. Most of the radiation detection instruments currently fielded at the local level are carried by law enforcement personnel and are designed for interdiction missions - referred to here as preventative radiological/nuclear detection (PRND) instruments. This study investigated how this PRND equipment can be repurposed in consequence management (CM) missions.

61 RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY↗