Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Robinson, Craig

Publications and source records attributed to Robinson, Craig.

6 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2020

CMC / EBC Research at NASA Glenn in 2020: Recent Progress and Plans

As part of NASA's Aeronautics research, Glenn Research Center has developed SiC/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composites for 2700 °F turbine engine applications in the next generation of ultra-efficient aircraft. In this presentation, the development of fiber and matrix constituents and fabrication processes that enabled this advancement will be reviewed, and characterization of the resulting improvements in CMC mechanical properties and durability will be summarized. Progress toward the development and validation of models predicting the effects of the engine environment on durability of Ceramic Matrix Composites and Environmental Barrier Coatings will be summarized. Results from current collaborative research with industry and other government agencies will be reviewed. Research plans for 2020 and opportunities for future collaborations with NASA will also be summarized.

Grady, Joseph↗
NASA NTRS2019

Overview of Environmental Durability Coatings and Test Capabilities

Overview of LME organizations capabilities including the Analytical and experimental capabilities of the Environmental Effects and Coatings Branch (LME), Case Studies - Past Hypersonics related work, and current capabilities relevant for future hypersonic work with multi-layer coatings concepts and unique testing capabilities.

environmental durability↗
NASA NTRS2017

Advanced Thermal Barrier and Environmental Barrier Coating Development at NASA GRC

This presentation summarizes NASA's advanced thermal barrier and environmental barrier coating systems, and the coating performance improvements that has recently been achieved and documented in laboratory simulated rig test conditions. One of the emphases has been placed on the toughness and impact resistance enhancements of the low conductivity, defect cluster thermal barrier coating systems. The advances in the next generation environmental barrier coatings for SiCSiC ceramic matrix composites have also been highlighted, particularly in the design of a new series of oxide-silicate composition systems to be integrated with next generation SiC-SiC turbine engine components for 2700F coating applications. Major technical barriers in developing the thermal and environmental barrier coating systems are also described. The performance and model validations in the rig simulated turbine combustion, heat flux, steam and calcium-magnesium-aluminosilicate (CMAS) environments have helped the current progress in improved temperature capability, environmental stability, and long-term fatigue-environment system durability of the advanced thermal and environmental barrier coating systems.

Thermal Barrier and Environmental Barrier Coatings↗
NASA NTRS2017

Liquid Nitrogen Zero Boiloff Testing

Cryogenic propellants such as liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LO2) are a part of NASAs future space exploration due to their high specific impulse for rocket motors of upper stages suitable for transporting 10s to 100s of metric tons of payload mass to destinations outside of low earth orbit and for their return. However, the low storage temperatures of LH2 and LO2 cause substantial boil-off losses for missions with durations greater than several months. These losses can be eliminated by incorporating high performance cryocooler technology to intercept heat load to the propellant tanks and modulating the cryocooler to control tank pressure. The active thermal control technology being developed by NASA is the reverse turbo-Brayton cycle cryocooler and its integration to the propellant tank through a distributed cooling tubing network coupled to the tank wall. This configuration was recently tested at NASA Glenn Research Center, in a vacuum chamber and cryo-shroud that simulated the essential thermal aspects of low Earth orbit, its vacuum and temperature. Testing consisted of three passive tests with the active cryo-cooler system off, and 7 active tests, with the cryocooler powered up. The test matrix included zero boil-off tests performed at 90 full and 25 full, and several demonstrations at excess cooling capacity and reduced cooling capacity. From this, the tank pressure response with varied cryocooler power inputs was determined. This test series established that the active cooling system integrated with the propellant tank eliminated boil-off and robustly controlled tank pressure.

Cryogenic fluid management↗