Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Romankiewicz, John

Publications and source records attributed to Romankiewicz, John.

Low-Carbon City Policy Databook: 72 Policy Recommendations for Chinese Cities from the Benchmarking and Energy Savings Tool for Low Carbon Cities

This report is designed to help city authorities evaluate and prioritize more than 70 different policy strategies that can reduce their city’s energy use and carbon-based greenhouse gas emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ). Local government officials, researchers, and planners can utilize the report to identify policies most relevant to local circumstances and to develop a low carbon city action plan that can be implemented in phases, over a multi-year timeframe. The policies cover nine city sectors: industry, public and commercial buildings, residential buildings, transportation, power and heat, street lighting, water & wastewater, solid waste, and urban green space. See Table 1 for a listing of the policies. Recognizing the prominence of urban industry in the energy and carbon inventories of Chinese cities, this report includes low carbon city policies for the industrial sector. The policies gathered here have proven effective in multiple locations around the world and have the potential to achieve future energy and carbon savings in Chinese cities.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

A Review of Commercially Available Technologies in Developing Low Carbon Eco-cities

Half of China’s population now lives in cities whose rapidly increasing populations burden already crowded infrastructure and exacerbate environmental and climate change stresses, threatening public health and quality of life (Chinese Society for Urban Studies 2011; Zhou and Williams 2013). To help address these challenges, China’s central and local governments have moved aggressively toward building low-carbon eco-cities, which have significant potential to mitigate and adapt to climate change (Zhou, He, and Williams 2012). However, there is a lack of information to assist policy makers in defining low-carbon eco-cities, evaluating progress toward low-carbon and ecological goals, and finding information on policies and technologies to improve the performance of developing a low-carbon eco-cites.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Comparative Policy Study for Green Buildings in U.S. and China

Prominent barriers facing the U.S. green building industry include the fact that government bodies that supervise health, fire safety, land, and other public operations are slow to revise codes to accommodate green building (regulatory barrier). In China, the lack of a green building professional accreditation process similar to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) AP process limits the green building workforce capacity development (informational barrier). The main policies highlighted in this report to tackle these barriers are 1) comprehensive codes and labeling plan (informational, institutional), 2) government-led targets and demonstrations (risk), 3) education and awareness programs (informational), 4) fiscal policy that supports green building investment (financial), and 5) integrated design promotion (institutional, financial).

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗

Data Availability in Appliance Standards and Labeling Program Development and Evaluation

In this report, we describe the necessary data inputs for both standards development and program evaluation and perform an initial assessment of the availability and uncertainty of those data inputs in China. For standards development, we find that China and its standards and labeling program administrators currently has access to the basic market and technical data needed for conducting market and technology assessment and technological and economic analyses. Some data, such as shipments data, is readily available from the China Energy Label product registration database while the availability of other data, including average unit energy consumption, prices and design options, needs improvement. Unlike some other countries such as the United States, most of the necessary data for conducting standards development analyses are not publicly available or compiled in a consolidated data source. In addition, improved data on design and efficiency options as well as cost data (e.g., manufacturing costs, mark-ups, production and product use-phase costs) – key inputs to several technoeconomic analyses – are particularly in need given China’s unconsolidated manufacturing industry. For program evaluation, we find that while China can conduct simple savings evaluations on its incentive programs with the data it currently has available from the Ministry of Finance – the program administrator, the savings estimates produced by such an evaluation will carry high uncertainty. As such, China could benefit from an increase in surveying and metering in the next one to three years to decrease the uncertainty surrounding key data points such as unit energy savings and free ridership.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗