Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

S Goossens

Publications and source records attributed to S Goossens.

9 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2026

Synchronized Eruptions on Io: Possible Evidence of Interconnected Subsurface Magma Reservoirs

On 27 December 2024, Juno's JIRAM (Jovian InfraRed Auroral Mapper) instrument observed an unprecedented volcanic event in Io's southern hemisphere, covering a vast region of ∼65,000 km2, near 73°S, 140°E. Within the imaged region, only one hot spot was previously known (Pfd454). This feature was earlier estimated to cover an area of 300 km2 with a total power output of 34 GW. JIRAM results show that the region produces a power output of 140–260 TW, over 1,000 times higher than earlier estimates and likely exceeding the brightest eruption ever recorded on Io, that of Surt in 2001 (∼80 TW). Three adjacent hot spots also exhibited dramatic power increases: P139, PV18, and an unnamed feature south of the main one that surged to ∼1 TW, placing all of them among the top 10 most powerful hot spots observed on Io. A temperature analysis of the features supports the simultaneous onset of these brightenings and suggests a single eruptive event propagating beneath the surface across hundreds of kilometers; this is the first time this has been observed on Io. This in turn would imply a connection among the hotspots' magma reservoirs, while other nearby hotspots that have been known to be active in the recent past, such as Kurdalagon Patera, appear unaffected. The simultaneity supports models of massive, interconnected magma reservoirs. The topology of these regional magma systems may resemble that of a large-scale sponge, in which the massive reservoirs are the pores, interconnected through a largely solid outer shell.

A Mura↗
NASA NTRS2021

The Mercury Lander Mission Concept Study: Enabling Transformative Science from the Surface of the Inner-Most Planet

As an end-member of rockyplanet formation, Mercury holds unique clues about the original distribution of elements in the earliest stages of Solar System development,as well as how planets form and evolve in close proximity to their host starsgenerally. This Mercury Lander mission concept enables in situ surface measurements that address several fundamental science questions raised by MESSENGER’s pioneering exploration of Mercury. Such measurements are needed to understand Mercury’s unique mineralogy and geo-chemistry; to characterize the structure of the planet’s proportionally massive core’s structure; to measure the planet’s active and ancient magnetic fields at the surface; to investigate the processes that alter the surface and produce the exosphere; and to provide groundtruth for current and future remote datasets

C M Ernst↗
NASA NTRS2017

Small-Scale Density Variations in the Lunar Crust Revealed by GRAIL

Data from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission have revealed that approximately 98 percent of the power of the gravity signal of the Moon at high spherical harmonic degrees correlates with the topography. The remaining 2 percent of the signal, which cannot be explained by topography, contains information about density variations within the crust. These high-degree Bouguer gravity anomalies are likely caused by small-scale (10's of km) shallow density variations. Here we use gravity inversions to model the small-scale three-dimensional variations in the density of the lunar crust. Inversion results from three non-descript areas yield shallow density variations in the range of 100-200 kg/m3. Three end-member scenarios of variations in porosity, intrusions into the crust, and variations in bulk crustal composition were tested as possible sources of the density variations. We find that the density anomalies can be caused entirely by changes in porosity. Characteristics of density anomalies in the South Pole-Aitken basin also support porosity as a primary source of these variations. Mafic intrusions into the crust could explain many, but not all of the anomalies. Additionally, variations in crustal composition revealed by spectral data could only explain a small fraction of the density anomalies. Nevertheless, all three sources of density variations likely contribute. Collectively, results from this study of GRAIL gravity data, combined with other studies of remote sensing data and lunar samples, show that the lunar crust exhibits variations in density by plus or minus 10 percent over scales ranging from centimeters to 100’s of kilometers.

J C Jansen↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mercury Lander: A Planetary Mission Concept Study for the 2023–2032 Decadal Survey

Mercury holds unique clues to the distribution of elements at the birth of the solar system and how planets form and evolve in close proximity to their host stars. The Mercury Lander mission concept returns in situ measurements to: understand Mercury’s unique mineralogy and geochemistry; characterize the massive core’s structure; measure the planet’s active and ancient magnetic fields at the surface; investigate the processes that alter the surface and produce the exosphere; and provide groundtruth for remote datasets. The mission concept achieves one Mercury year (~88 Earth days) of surface operations with an 11-instrument, high-heritage payload delivered to a landing site within Mercury’s widely distributed low-reflectance material, and addresses science goals encompassing geochemistry, geophysics, the Mercury space environment, and geology. The spacecraft launches on an expendable SpaceX Falcon Heavy in 2035. The four-stage flight system uses a solar-electric propulsion cruise stage to reach Mercury in2045. The orbital stage brings the spacecraft into a thermally safe orbit, then performs orbital maneuvers to prepare for descent. During the orbital phase, a narrow-angle camera acquires images for selecting a low-hazard landing zone within our region of interest. The descent stage begins the braking burn ~120 s before landing. The lander continues to touchdown, using continuous LIDAR operations to support hazard detection and safely deliver the payload to the surface. Landing is at dusk to meet thermal requirements, permitting ~30 hours of sunlight for initial observations. The radioisotope-powered lander continues operations through the Mercury night. Direct-to-Earth communication is possible for the initial three weeks of landed operations, drops out for six weeks, and resumes for the final month. Thermal conditions exceed lander operating temperatures shortly after sunrise, ending operations. A total of ~11 GB of data are returned to Earth. The Phase A–D mission cost estimate (50% unencumbered reserves, excluding launch vehicle) is $1.2 B(FY25$), comparing favorably with past New Frontiers missions and to the cost cap in the New Frontiers4 call(~$1.1B FY25$). This cost estimate shows that a Mercury Lander mission is feasible and compelling as a New Frontiers-class mission in the coming decade.

C M Ernst↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Landing on Mercury: A Geochemical Perspective

The data from the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft have revealed several surprising characteristics about the surface of Mercury, leading to its classification as a geochemical endmember among the terrestrial planets. Some of these features include elevated abundances of up to 3 wt% S, as much as 4 wt% C enrichment in low-reflectance materials (LRM) over the local mean, Na up to 5 wt% at high northern latitudes, and Fe abundances typically lower than 2 wt% [e.g., 1–4]. The S and Fe concentrations have been used to infer that Mercury’s igneous history evolved under highly reduced oxygen fugacity conditions between 2.6 and 7.3 log(sub 10) units below the iron–wüstite buffer [e.g., 5], which is more reducing than any other terrestrial planet in the solar system [e.g., 6]. This highly reduced nature has important con-sequences for the differentiation and thermal/magmatic evolution of Mercury. While the immense amount of data collected by MESSENGER revealed Mercury as a geochemical endmember, this new knowledge raised additional questions that necessitate continued exploration of the planet. Indeed, the joint ESA–JAXA dual-orbiter BepiColombo mission, launched in October 2018, is the most ambitious effort yet attempted to explore Mercury [e.g., 7]. Direct in situ elemental and mineralogical measurements on Mercury’s surface, however, are essential for addressing the new science questions that have arisen since MESSENGER.

K E Vander Kaaden↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Constraints on the Origin of Mercury’s Large Core from Core-Mantle Differentiation Models

Mercury’s core is notoriously large when compared to other planets of our solar system. The origin of this large core is still uncertain. Available data on the surface composition and internal structure of Mercury from the past MESSENGER mission and future data collected by BepiColombo will continue to provide clues to Mercury’s formation. Here, we present results combining experimental data on elemental distribution between core and mantle with spacecraft data, to estimate bulk Mercury composition. We applied this strategy to major elements (Fe, Si, Mg, Al and O), as well as minor elements (Cr and Ti), and compared derived compositions to chondritic data and the chemical compositions of the other terrestrial planets. Our results show that Mercury has a chemical composition significantly different from all known materials of the solar system. In addition, numerous scenarios were proposed to explain Mercury’s structure, including “chaotic models” such as giant impacts and “orderly models” such as aerodynamic sorting. Here, we tested whether Mercury’s composition can be explained by mantle stripping by impacts. We will show how such a scenario reconciles several features of Mercury’s geochemistry with chondritic data. We will also discuss the outlook of additional constraints from supplementary data potentially collected by BepiColombo.

Mercury↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Astrometric Reduction of Phoebe Using a Digital Shape Model

The Cassini Imaging Science Subsystem (ISS) has provided the most spectacular images of the Saturnian system [1] and these observations constitute a fundamental dataset of high accuracy and exceptionally long-time span for the purpose of astrometry [2]. Several elaborate astrometric efforts using Cassini ISS data have demonstrated their use for the development and maintenance of the Saturnian satellite ephemerides and have been critical in improving our understanding of their secular orbital evolution and interior properties[3].Astrometric efforts using images with well-resolved bodies often employ limb-based methods for center finding; this is proven to be robust for satellites with a uniform ellipsoidal shape. However, systematic biases are of concern for bodies that deviate considerably from tri-axial ellipsoids(e.g., moons with irregular shapes and/or extensive features such as craters, ridges, slumps and grooves). To help understand such biases, we used the Goddard Image Analysis and Navigation Tool (GIANT) [4,5]to improve the astrometric reduction of these moons. Here we apply the method to Phoebe (Saturn IX).

V Viswanathan↗