Engineering topics

Samantha Bittinger

Publications and source records attributed to Samantha Bittinger.

3 records

NASA NTRS2021

Demonstration of Multilayer Insulation, Vapor Cooling of Structure, and Mass Gauging for Large Scale Upper Stages: Structural Heat Intercept, Insulation, and Vibration Evaluation Rig (SHIIVER) Final Report

Testing was completed on the Structural Heat Intercept, Insulation, and Vibration Evaluation Rig (SHIIVER) between August 2019 and January 2020. SHIIVER was designed to be a test bed for the scaling of cryogenic fluid management technologies as applied to large upper stages and long duration in-space stages. The hardware consists of a 4 meter diameter stainless steel tank, structural skirts supporting the tank in the aft direction, and an aluminum forward skirt with vapor cooling channels bolted to it. The initial testing of the SHIIVER hardware was with liquid hydrogen and liquid nitrogen (as a substitute fluid for liquid oxygen and liquid methane) and sought to demonstrate the use of boil-off vapor to intercept heat on a structural skirt, multilayer insulation (MLI) on the tank domes, and the radio frequency mass gauge (RFMG). Testing was completed in four stages: a baseline thermal vacuum test prior to installation of the MLI, a thermal vacuum test after the MLI installation, a reverberant acoustic test, and a subsequent thermal vacuum test to verify that no damage occurred during the reverberant acoustic testing. Each thermal vacuum test with chamber wall at ambient temperature and vacuum level in the 10-6 torr range was conducted continuously between approximately 90% full and 25% full. Test results showed that the vapor cooling reduced the heat load to the tank by approximately 10%, but the boil-off by less than 3% at 50% full with no MLI on the domes. It reduced the heat load to the tank by approximately 10%, but the boil-off was essentially unchanged at 50% full whether or not vapor cooling was operational with MLI on the domes. The MLI reduced the heat load to the tank by approximately 40% at all fill levels, but the boil-off by approximately 25% at 90% full and 45% below 65% full. The RFMG performed well over all fill ranges, and several RF tank modes were used to gauge the mass of fluid in the tank. SHIIVER was then exposed to an acoustic environment of 147 dB OASPL (overall sound pressure level) in a reverberant chamber. The acoustic environment and profile envelopes the upper stage internal acoustic level of several different modern launch vehicles. No structural or thermal performance changes were observed as a result of acoustic testing. Final thermal vacuum testing after the acoustic testing showed no degradation to the MLI due to the acoustic environment as measured via system heat loads.

SHIIVER↗

NASA NTRS2020

Technology Demonstration Mission (TDM) Evolvable Cryogenics (eCryo) Project: Structural Heat Intercept, Insulation, and Vibration Evaluation Rig (SHIIVER) - Test Plan

The initial test of the SHIIVER system includes multilayer insulation and vapor cooled structure. Testing will occur in the In-Space Propulsion Facility (thermal/vacuum) and RATF (acoustic) facilities at Plum Brook Station in Sandusky Ohio. The testing will demonstrate the performance benefits of multilayer insulation and vapor based heat intercept on a “large scale” test article in a manner befitting large upper stages.

Large Scale Hydrogen Testing, Cryogenics, Multilay↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Payload Fairing Acoustic Trade Study: Fill Effect Modeling

A review of acoustic fill effect was conducted using vibroacoustic models of the NASA Space Launch System Block 1B 8.4-meter Payload Fairing. Fill effect is the term used to describe how sound pressure levels (SPLs) inside of a launch vehicle’s payload cavity change when a payload is present, compared to that of an unfilled cavity. Several vibroacoustic models with various payload shapes were developed and the deviation in output from an unfilled cavity model were compared to an analytical fill effect calculation. The analytical expression for the fill effect correction factor, known as the fill factor, is published in NASA-STD-7001B. The development and validation of the NASA fill factor is discussed to provide context for this study and define important variables including the volume fill percentage and the fairing-payload separation gap. The fill factor is reviewed from two perspectives; a global perspective which defines the volume ratio with respect to the entire fairing cavity, and a local perspective which defines the volume ratio with respect to a zone of interest dependent on the payload’s height. The global perspective was considered because it allows a decoupling of the volume ratio and fairing-payload separation gap variables. Both the global and local fill factor methods have difficulty capturing low frequency SPL because of a breakdown in the underlying assumptions of a diffuse acoustic field. Spatial variation in the pressure field at low frequency showed that axially oriented standing waves may be of concern for sensitive payload components; radial variation in SPL was found to be less significant. Further, a novel secondary derivation of the theoretical fill factor is posed for future work in which the absorption characteristics of the payload and fairing surfaces are considered. This work is supported by the NASA Glenn Research Center and the Space Launch System Payload Fairing Working Group.

Spacecraft environments↗