Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Samantha Gildersleeve

Publications and source records attributed to Samantha Gildersleeve.

Validation Experiments of Incipient Turbulent Separation over an Axisymmetric Afterbody

Historically, the flow physics involved with most turbulent separated flows have presented fundamental challenges in validation between experimental and numerical approaches. As recognized by the CFD Vision 2030 study commissioned by NASA, validation of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and other scale-resolving methods for turbulent separated flow requires the support of advanced, high-fidelity experiments designed specifically for CFD implementation. In accordance with this effort, a new test platform, referred to as the NASA Axisymmetric Afterbody, was designed to obtain detailed information of the flow field over a smooth body, undergoing adverse pressure gradient induced separation for a fixed Reynolds number, Re = 180,000. The parametric body offers a range of flow states from fully attached,incipient separation, to fully separated flow based on variable afterbody geometries. In an initial effort to evaluate RANS turbulence model capabilities, the present configuration of the axisymmetric model features a mild adverse pressure gradient over the contoured boattail section, inducing incipient turbulent separation. Experiments include steady pressure measurements to serve as preliminary comparisons to simulation studies, which examine the effect of variable grid domains and RANS turbulence models, in an effort to understand and evaluate the critical variability between solutions for the present configuration. Results indicate potential discrepancies may be due to the effect of the square tunnel test section walls, relatively large blockage ratio, and inconsistent reference parameters. Ongoing work will focus on the experimental campaigns to obtain surface flow visualizations and high-resolution, off-body flow field measurements using Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV) and Laser Doppler Velocimetry (LDV) techniques to provide a detailed benchmark dataset to aid turbulence modelers.

axisymmetric afterbody↗

Asymmetric Flow State Switching in the Space Launch System Block 2 Liftoff Environment

An in-depth investigation was conducted at the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel to evaluate flow state switching in the liftoff flow environment of the Space Launch System Block 2 Crew launch vehicle using force measurements, two-component particle image velocimetry, and tuft flow visualization. Multimodal flow states were observed in the gap flow between the centerbody and solid rocket boosters at a range of incoming flow angles and were characterized for the relative strength of state switches. When flow switches occur, the flow is predominantly bimodal, but trimodal flow states are observed with the launch tower downstream of the vehicle. Tuft visualization indicates three-dimensionality during flow state switching, which initiates at one part of the gap and quickly transitions throughout the length of the booster. Due to the long time scales between switches, statistics such as frequency of flow state switches and converged state probabilities cannot be established without significantly increased acquisition times.

Lee J. Mears↗

Asymmetric Flow State Switching on the Space Launch System (SLS) Block 2 Crew Vehicle

An in-depth investigation was conducted at the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel to evaluate flow state switching in the liftoff flow environment of the Space Launch System Block 2 Crew launch vehicle using side force measurements, two-component particle image velocimetry, and tufts flow visualization. Multimodal flow states were observed in the gap flow between the centerbody and solid rocket boosters at a range of incoming flow angles and were characterized for the relative strength of state switches. When flow switches occur, the flow is predominantly bimodal, but trimodal flow states are observed with the launch tower downstream of the vehicle. Tufts visualization indicates three-dimensionality during flow state switching, which initiates at one part of the gap and quickly transitions throughout the length of the booster. Due to the long time scales between switches, statistics such as frequency of flow state switches and converged state probabilities cannot be established without significantly increased acquisition times.

Lee J. Mears↗

Validation Experiments for Turbulent Separation over an Axisymmetric Body of Revolution

Historically, the flow physics involved with most turbulent separated flows have presented fundamental challenges to validating numerical approaches. As recognized by the CFD Vision 2030 study commissioned by NASA, validation of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and other scale-resolving methods for turbulent separated flow requires data from advanced, high-fidelity experiments designed specifically for CFD implementation. In accordance with this effort, a new test platform, referred to as the NASA Axisymmetric Afterbody, was designed to obtain detailed measurements of the flow field undergoing a smooth, adverse pressure gradient induced separation for a fixed Reynolds number, Re = 180,000. The parametric body offers a range of flow states progressing from fully attached, to incipient separation, and finally to small-scale separated flow based on variable afterbody geometries. In an initial effort to evaluate RANS turbulence model capabilities, the present configurations of the axisymmetric model host a mild adverse pressure gradient over the contoured boattail section, inducing incipient turbulent separation, as well as a slightly larger adverse pressure gradient, inducing a small-scale region of turbulent separation. Experiments include steady pressure measurements and 2-D PIV to provide the preliminary dataset for simulation studies, which examine the effect of variable grid domains and RANS turbulence models. This is done in an effort to understand and evaluate the critical variability between solutions for the present model configurations. Results indicate potential discrepancies may be due to the effect of the square tunnel test section walls, relatively large blockage ratio, and slight variability in reference parameters. Ongoing work will focus on higher fidelity experimental campaigns to obtain surface flow visualizations and Stereo-Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV) to deliver higher spatial resolution of the three-dimensional flow field to aid turbulence modelers.

Validation↗