Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Sanborn, Brett

Publications and source records attributed to Sanborn, Brett.

18 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Toward accurate prediction of partial-penetration laser weld performance informed by three-dimensional characterization – Part II: μCT based finite element simulations

The mechanical behavior of partial-penetration laser welds exhibits significant variability in engineering quantities such as strength and apparent ductility. Understanding the root cause of this variability is important when using such welds in engineering designs. In Part II of this work, we develop finite element simulations with geometry derived from micro-computed tomography (μCT) scans of partial-penetration 304L stainless steel laser welds that were analyzed in Part I. We use these models to study the effects of the welds’ small-scale geometry, including porosity and weld depth variability, on the structural performance metrics of weld ductility and strength under quasi-static tensile loading. We show that this small-scale geometry is the primary cause of the observed variability for these mechanical response quantities. Additionally, we explore the sensitivity of model results to the conversion of the μCT data to discretized model geometry using different segmentation algorithms, and to the effect of small-scale geometry simplifications for pore shape and weld root texture. The modeling approach outlined and results of this work may be applicable to other material systems with small-scale geometric features and defects, such as additively manufactured materials.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Thermal-Mechanical Elastic-Plastic and Ductile Failure Model Calibrations for 6061-T651 Aluminum Alloy from Plate

Numerical simulations of metallic structures undergoing rapid loading into the plastic range require material models that accurately represent the response. In general, the material response can be seen as having four interrelated parts: the baseline response under slow loading, the effect of strain rate, the conversion of plastic work into heat and the effect of temperature. In essence, the material behaves in a thermal-mechanical manner if the loading is fast enough so when heat is generated by plastic deformation it raises the temperature and therefore influences the mechanical response. In these cases, appropriate models that can capture the aspects listed above are necessary. The matters of interest here are the elastic-plastic response and ductile failure behavior of 6061-T651 aluminum alloy under the conditions described above. The work was accomplished by first designing and conducting a material test program to provide data for the calibration of a modular $J_2$ plasticity model with isotropic hardening as well as a ductile failure model. Both included modules that accounted for temperature and strain rate dependence. The models were coupled with an adiabatic heating module to calculate the temperature rise due to the conversion of plastic work to heat. The test program included uniaxial tension tests conducted at room temperature, 150 and 300 C and at strain rates between 10 –4 and 10 3 1/s as well as four geometries of notched tension specimens and two tests on specimens with shear-dominated deformations. The test data collected allowed the calibration of both the plasticity and the ductile failure models. Most test specimens were extracted from a single piece of plate to maintain consistency. Notched tension tests came from a possibly different plate, but from the same lot. When using the model in structural finite element calculations, element formulations and sizes different from those used to model the test specimens in the calibration are likely to be used. A brief investigation demonstrated that the failure model can be particularly sensitive to the element selection and provided an initial guide to compensate in a specific example.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Thermal-Mechanical Elastic-Plastic and Ductile Failure Model Calibrations for 304L Stainless Steel Alloy

Numerical simulations of metallic structures undergoing rapid loading into the plastic range require material models that accurately represent the response. In general, the material response can be seen as having four interrelated parts: the baseline response under slow loading, the effect of strain rate, the conversion of plastic work into heat and the effect of temperature. In essence, the material behaves in a thermal-mechanical manner if the loading is fast enough so when heat is generated by plastic deformation it raises the temperature and therefore influences the mechanical response. In these cases, appropriate models that can capture the aspects listed above are necessary. The material of interest here is 304L stainless steel, and the objective of this work is to calibrate thermal-mechanical models: one for the constitutive behavior and another for failure. The work was accomplished by first designing and conducting a material test program to provide data for the calibration of the models. The test program included uniaxial tension tests conducted at room temperature, 150 and 300 C and at strain rates between 10 –4 and 10 3 1/s. It also included notched tension and shear-dominated compression hat tests specifically designed to calibrate the failure model. All test specimens were extracted from a single piece of plate to maintain consistency. The constitutive model adopted was a modular $J_2$ plasticity model with isotropic hardening that included rate and temperature dependence. A criterion for failure initiation based on a critical value of equivalent plastic strain fitted the failure data appropriately and was adopted. Possible ranges of the values of the parameters of the models were determined partially on historical data from calibrations of the same alloy from other lots and are given here. The calibration of the parameters of the models were based on finite element simulations of the various material tests using relatively ne meshes and hexahedral elements. When using the model in structural finite element calculations, however, element formulations and sizes different from those in the calibration are likely to be used. A brief investigation demonstrated that the failure initiation predictions can be particularly sensitive to the element selection and provided an initial guide to compensate for the effect of element size in a specific example.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Mechanical characterization of 304L-VAR stainless steel in tension with a full coverage of low, intermediate, and high strain rates

A 304L-VAR stainless steel is mechanically characterized in tension over a full range of strain rates from low, intermediate, to high using a variety of apparatuses. While low- and high-strain-rate tests are conducted with a conventional Instron and a Kolsky tension bar, the tensile tests at intermediate strain rates are conducted with a fast MTS and a Drop-Hopkinson bar. The fast MTS used in this study is able to obtain reliable tensile response at the strain rates up to 150 s -1 , whereas the lower limit for the Drop-Hopkinson bar is 100 s -1 . Combining the fast MTS and the Drop-Hopkinson bar closes the gap within the intermediate strain rate regime. Using these four apparatuses, the tensile stress-strain curves of the 304L-VAR stainless steel are obtained at strain rates on each order of magnitude ranging from 0.0001 to 2580 s -1 . All tensile stress-strain curves exhibit linear elasticity followed by significant work hardening prior to necking. After necking occurrs, the specimen load decreases, and the deformation becomes highly localized until fracture. The tensile stress-strain response of the 304L-VAR stainless steel exhibits strain rate dependence. The flow stress increases with increasing strain rate and is described with a power law. The strain-rate sensitivity is also strain-dependent, possibly due to thermosoftening caused by adiabatic heating at high strain rates. The 304L-VAR stainless steel shows significant ductility. The true strains at the onset of necking and at failure are determined. The results show that the true strains at both onset of necking and failure decrease with increasing strain rate. The true failure strains are approximately 200% at low strain rates but are significantly lower (~100%) at high strain rates. The transition of true failure strain occurs within the intermediate strain rate range between 10 -2 and 10 2 s -1 . A Boltzmann description is used to present the effect of nominal strain rate on true failure strain.

304L-VAR stainless Steel↗