Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Scheele, Randall D.

Publications and source records attributed to Scheele, Randall D..

A laboratory-scale process for producing dilithium beryllium tetrafluoride (FLiBe) with dissolved uranium tetrafluoride

Flibe Energy, Incorporated (FEI)'s conceptual Lithium Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR) incorporates a chemical processing facility aimed at recovering uranium and other valuable volatile radionuclides while managing harmful radionuclides from the used fuel. The fuel utilized in this reactor is a combination of dilithium beryllium tetrafluoride (Li 2 BeF 4 or FLiBe) and uranium tetrafluoride (UF 4 ), (FLiBe/U). FEI's plan involves extracting the uranium and other valuable volatile fluoride-forming radionuclides using nitrogen trifluoride (NF 3 ). To facilitate laboratory-scale testing of uranium extraction using NF 3 and address the toxicity and physical hazards associated with beryllium and beryllium fluoride (BeF 2 ), we used a two-step process to prepare the simulated fuel salt. The first step entailed thermally decomposing ammonium beryllium tetrafluoride [(NH 4 ) 2 BeF 4 ] (ABeF) through a nominal 3-step process, combined with appropriate amounts of lithium fluoride (LiF) and UF 4 , resulting in the formation of beryllium fluoride (BeF 2 ). In the second step, the mixture was repeatedly melted and frozen at the melting point of FLiBe to prepare the eutectic FLiBe with dissolved UF 4 . Although the concept appears straightforward, the production of FLiBe/U involved various challenges. These challenges included transporting the gaseous decomposition products of ABeF, hydrogen fluoride (HF) and ammonia (NH 3 ), while preventing the formation of ammonium fluoride (NH 4 F). Additionally, it was necessary to control the reaction between the higher-than-anticipated water content in the commercial ABeF with NH 3 , HF, and the condensed NH 4 F, protect UF 4 from forming an unknown black compound, select suitable structural materials to mitigate fluoride corrosion, address the risks associated with beryllium toxicity through equipment design and operational protocols, and monitor process conditions. This article provides an account of the thermal decomposition chemistry observed in the commercial ABeF, describes the FLiBe/U production apparatus, describes the experiences and process refinements developed to prepare FLiBe/U, and presents our characterizations of prepared FLiBe/U.

Ammonium beryllium fluoride thermal decomposition↗

Effect of Added Gadolinium Oxide on the Thermal Air Oxidation of Uranium Dioxide

To develop a more reliable and stable UO2-based nuclear fuel, the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) investigated modifying fuel with several soluble lanthanides and zirconium. This article provides the results of these studies investigating gadolinium doping at levels up to 10 mass%. The authors characterized and compared commercially- and PNNL-prepared gadolinium-doped UO2 to determine the oxygen-to-metal ratio, elemental distribution, chemical composition, physical appearance, lattice parameters, and grain structure using atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy, and X-ray diffractometry. After confirming PNNL-prepared UO2 and (Gd,U)O2 were similar to commercially prepared UO2 and (Gd,U)O2, we measured the thermal behavior of these gadolinium-doped UO2 materials to air oxidation using differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. Addition of gadolinium stabilized the first oxidation product U4¬O9/U3O7 and slowed the subsequent oxidation to U3O8. Comparison of our measured two-step oxidation of UO2 to U3O8 at 325°C to common gas/solid kinetic reaction models found that each oxidation step is best described as a convolution of kinetic behaviors; the gadolinium insertion into the UO2 lattice enforces a significant alteration in mechanism and oxidation rate. Noticeable changes in mechanism become apparent between 1% and 3% gadolinium content.

Uranium Dioxide, Gadolinium Oxide, Thermal Air Oxi↗

Gas-phase molybdenum-99 separation from uranium dioxide by fluoride volatility using nitrogen trifluoride

Production of the important 99m Tc medical isotope parent, molybdenum-99 ( 99 Mo), via the fissioning of high- and low-enriched uranium (HEU/LEU) targets followed by target dissolution in acid and solution-phase purification of 99 Mo is time-consuming, generates quantities of corrosive radioactive waste, and can result in the release of an array of radionuclides to the atmosphere. An alternative 99 Mo purification method has been devised that has the potential to alleviate many of these issues. Herein, we demonstrate the feasibility of a rapid Mo/Tc gas-phase separation from UO 2 . The results indicate that volatile [ 99 Mo]Mo can be captured downstream of the reacted solid mixture on a column bed (trap) of alumina; the majority of the captured [ 99 Mo]Mo can be subsequently eluted from the alumina trap with a few milliliters of water. >1.0 × 10 5 single pass decontamination of U and the collected [ 99 Mo]Mo product is demonstrated. This simple thermo-fluorination technique has the potential to provide a rapid methodology for routine 99 Mo production.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗