Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Schierman, John D.

Publications and source records attributed to Schierman, John D..

11 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Runtime Assurance Protection for Advanced Turbofan Engine Control

This paper describes technical progress made in the application of run time assurance (RTA) methods to turbofan engines with advanced propulsion control algorithms that are employed to improve engine performance. It is assumed that the advanced algorithms cannot be fully certified using current verification and validation approaches and therefore need to be continually monitored by an RTA system that ensures safe operation. However, current turbofan engine control systems utilize engine protection logic for safe combustion dynamics and stable airflow through the engine. It was determined that the engine protection logic should continue to be used to provide system safety and should be considered as a part of the overall RTA system. The additional function that an RTA system provides is to perform diagnostics on anomalous conditions to determine if these conditions are being caused by errors in the advanced controller. If this is the case, the RTA system switches operation to a trusted reversionary controller. Initial studies were performed to demonstrate this benefit. The other focus was to improve the performance of the engine protection logic, which was deemed too conservative and reduced engine performance during transient operations. It was determined that the conservative response was due to poor tuning of one of the controller channels within the protection logic. An automatic tuning algorithm was implemented to optimize the protection logic control gains based on minimizing tracking error. Improved tracking responses were observed with no change to the existing protection logic control architecture.

runtime monitoring↗
NASA NTRS2014

Towards Run-time Assurance of Advanced Propulsion Algorithms

This paper covers the motivation and rationale for investigating the application of run-time assurance methods as a potential means of providing safety assurance for advanced propulsion control systems. Certification is becoming increasingly infeasible for such systems using current verification practices. Run-time assurance systems hold the promise of certifying these advanced systems by continuously monitoring the state of the feedback system during operation and reverting to a simpler, certified system if anomalous behavior is detected. The discussion will also cover initial efforts underway to apply a run-time assurance framework to NASA's model-based engine control approach. Preliminary experimental results are presented and discussed.

run time assurance↗
NASA NTRS1995

Cooperative control theory and integrated flight and propulsion control

The major contribution of this research was the exposition of the fact that airframe and engine interactions could be present, and their effects could include loss of stability and performance of the control systems. Also, the significance of two directional, as opposed to one-directional, coupling was identified and explained. A multivariable stability and performance analysis methodology was developed, and applied to several candidate aircraft configurations. In these example evaluations, the significance of these interactions was underscored. Also exposed was the fact that with interactions present along with some integrated control approaches, the engine command/limiting logic (which represents an important nonlinear component of the engine control system) can impact closed-loop airframe/engine system stability. Finally, a brief investigation of control-law synthesis techniques appropriate for the class of systems was pursued, and it was determined that multivariable techniques, including model-following formulations of LQG and/or H infinity methods, showed promise. However, for practical reasons, decentralized control architectures are preferred, which is an architecture incompatible with these synthesis methods. The major contributions of the second phase of the grant was the development of conditions under which no decentralized controller could achieve closed loop system requirements on stability and/or performance. Sought were conditions that depended only on properties of the plant and the requirement, and independent of any particular control law or synthesis approach. Therefore, they could be applied a priori, before synthesis of a candidate control law. Under this grant, such conditions were found regarding stability, and encouraging initial results were obtained regarding performance.

Schmidt, David K.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Cooperative control theory and integrated flight and propulsion control

This report documents the activities and research results obtained under a grant (NAG3-998) from the NASA Lewis Research Center. The focus of the research was the investigation of dynamic interactions between airframe and engines for advanced ASTOVL aircraft configurations, and the analysis of the implications of these interactions on the stability and performance of the airframe and engine control systems. In addition, the need for integrated flight and propulsion control for such aircraft was addressed. The major contribution of this research was the exposition of the fact that airframe and engine interactions could be present, and their effects could include loss of stability and performance of the control systems. Also, the significance of two directional, as opposed to one-directional, coupling was identified and explained. A multi variable stability and performance analysis methodology was developed, and applied to several candidate aircraft configurations. Also exposed was the fact that with interactions present along with some integrated control approaches, the engine command/limiting logic (which represents an important non-linear component of the engine control system) can impact closed-loop airframe/engine system stability. Finally, a brief investigation of control-law synthesis techniques appropriate for the class of systems was pursued, and it was determined that multi variable techniques, included model-following formulations of LQG and/or H (infinity) methods showed promise. However, for practical reasons, decentralized control architectures are preferred, which is an architecture incompatible with these synthesis methods.

Schmidt, David K.↗
NASA NTRS1993

A comparative study of multivariable robustness analysis methods as applied to integrated flight and propulsion control

Three multivariable robustness analysis methods are compared and contrasted. The focus of the analysis is on system stability and performance robustness to uncertainty in the coupling dynamics between two interacting subsystems. Of particular interest is interacting airframe and engine subsystems, and an example airframe/engine vehicle configuration is utilized in the demonstration of these approaches. The singular value (SV) and structured singular value (SSV) analysis methods are compared to a method especially well suited for analysis of robustness to uncertainties in subsystem interactions. This approach is referred to here as the interacting subsystem (IS) analysis method. This method has been used previously to analyze airframe/engine systems, emphasizing the study of stability robustness. However, performance robustness is also investigated here, and a new measure of allowable uncertainty for acceptable performance robustness is introduced. The IS methodology does not require plant uncertainty models to measure the robustness of the system, and is shown to yield valuable information regarding the effects of subsystem interactions. In contrast, the SV and SSV methods allow for the evaluation of the robustness of the system to particular models of uncertainty, and do not directly indicate how the airframe (engine) subsystem interacts with the engine (airframe) subsystem.

Schierman, John D.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Analysis of airframe/engine interactions for a STOVL aircraft with integrated flight/propulsion control

A multivariable analysis technique is used to evaluate the effects of the dynamic cross coupling between the airframe and engine subsystems in an advanced STOVL configuration. A critical frequency range is identified along with potentially poor stability robustness due to the airframe/engine interactions. Within the critical frequency range, stability and performance are found to be sensitive to variations in the coupling between the airframe's flight path angle and the engine's fuel flow rate. A stability sensitivity study indicates that the interactions between the flight path angle and the fuel flow rate are potentially the most critical with respect to stability and performance robustness.

Schierman, John D.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Analysis of airframe/engine interactions in integrated flight and propulsion control

An analysis framework for the assessment of dynamic cross-coupling between airframe and engine systems from the perspective of integrated flight/propulsion control is presented. This analysis involves to determining the significance of the interactions with respect to deterioration in stability robustness and performance, as well as critical frequency ranges where problems may occur due to these interactions. The analysis illustrated here investigates both the airframe's effects on the engine control loops and the engine's effects on the airframe control loops in two case studies. The second case study involves a multi-input/multi-output analysis of the airframe. Sensitivity studies are performed on critical interactions to examine the degradations in the system's stability robustness and performance. Magnitudes of the interactions required to cause instabilities, as well as the frequencies at which the instabilities occur are recorded. Finally, the analysis framework is expanded to include control laws which contain cross-feeds between the airframe and engine systems.

Schierman, John D.↗
NASA NTRS1991

A framework for the analysis of airframe/engine interactions and integrated flight/propulsion control

Potential sources of airframe/engine interactions are explored for aircraft subject to the study of integrated flight/propulsion control. A quasi-linear framework for the analysis of these dynamical interactions between the airframe and engine systems is presented. This analysis can be used to quantify, in a meaningful way, the magnitude of the interactions between the airframe and engine systems, determine if these interactions are significant to warrant further consideration in the control law synthesis, and if so, what are the critical frequency ranges where problems may occur due to these interactions. Justification for the use of this method, along with the assumptions, conditions, and restrictions that apply are discussed.

Schmidt, David K.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Analysis of airframe/engine interactions - An integrated control perspective

Techniques for the analysis of the dynamic interactions between airframe/engine dynamical systems are presented. Critical coupling terms are developed that determine the significance of these interactions with regard to the closed loop stability and performance of the feedback systems. A conceptual model is first used to indicate the potential sources of the coupling, how the coupling manifests itself, and how the magnitudes of these critical coupling terms are used to quantify the effects of the airframe/engine interactions. A case study is also presented involving an unstable airframe with thrust vectoring for attitude control. It is shown for this system with classical, decentralized control laws that there is little airframe/engine interaction, and the stability and performance with those control laws is not affected. Implications of parameter uncertainty in the coupling dynamics is also discussed, and effects of these parameter variations are also demonstrated to be small for this vehicle configuration.

Schmidt, David K.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Extended implicit model following as applied to integrated flight and propulsion control

An extended model-following control-synthesis method, including loop-transfer recovery, is presented and applied to synthesize control laws for integrated flight and propulsion control (IFPC). The vehicle considered is representative of an unstable modern fighter aircraft; with a two-dimensional thrust-vectoring and thrust-reversing nozzle. The linearized design model includes both airframe and engine dynamics. A model-following formulation of the LQR problem is extended to handle this hybrid problem. Compensators are then obtained to realize an output-feedback control law, by using a loop-transfer-recovery procedure. The airframe and engine responses are decoupled, and perfect airframe response following is obtained. The loop transfers also reveal good stability robustness and reasonable loop cross-over frequencies that would not lead to excessive actuation requirements.

Schmidt, David K.↗