Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Scolese, Christopher

Publications and source records attributed to Scolese, Christopher.

Explanation of Change (EoC) Study: Approach and Findings

This study investigated thirty historical NASA science missions to explain the cost change experienced. The study included investigation of historical milestone and monthly status report documentation followed by interviews with key project personnel. Based on the information collected, the reasons for cost change were binned, at the highest level, into four separate categories: NASA External, Project External, Internal Planning, and Internal Execution. The results identified that roughly a third of the change is outside of the project's control, a third is due to assumptions made in project planning, and a third is due to the inherent difficulty of building highly complex, one-of-a-kind, cutting edge, Earth and space science missions.

Bitten, Robert E.↗

Explanation of Change (EoC) Study: Considerations and Implementation Challenges

This paper discusses the implementation of considerations resulting from a study investigating the cost change experienced by historical NASA science missions. The study investigated historical milestone and monthly status report documentation followed by interviews with key project personnel. The reasons for cost change were binned as being external to NASA, external to the project and internal to the project relative to the project's planning and execution. Based on the results of the binning process and the synthesis of project meetings and interviews, ten considerations were made with the objective to decrease the potential for cost change in future missions. Although no one magic bullet consideration was discovered, the considerations taken as a whole should help reduce cost and schedule change in future NASA missions.

Bitten, Robert E.↗

Considerations on formation flying separations for earth observing satellite missions

We assume that scientific requirements (or other mission requirements) call for simultaneous observations from sensors located on different formation-flying spacecraft, and assess how well various kinds of formations of two and three spacecraft can meet these simultaneity requirements. We simulate two types of formation, one where the slave spacecraft moves with respect to the reference spacecraft, and the other where the two spacecraft are kept at a constant time separation. For each type of formation we consider two attitudes: a perfect local vertical local horizontal (LVLH) and an attitude which represents the maximum allowable mission tolerance offset from the mission requirements for attitude determination. We simulate formations of multiple spacecraft and determine how well they can perform simultaneous observations. For each spacecraft we compute the instantaneous ground projection of the center of the imager's fieId of view and plot the movement of the instantaneous ground projection of one spacecraft in the formation relative to the other. The size and shape of this effective ground target parametrize the size and shape of the actual ground target as well as the size and shape of the imager's field of view and the percentage of overlap required.

Folta, David↗

Field of view location and formation flying for polar orbiting missions

The problem of flying an earth observing mission using a group of observatories flying in formation, rather than a single observatory, is addressed. Contraints placed on the design of the observatories and of the mission, if it is required that the instantaneous field of views of the two instruments overlap by a specified amount, are determined. The complexities of formation flying are found to greatly outweigh simpler solutions which combine instruments on a single spacecraft payload. While formation flying may be beneficial when crossing times and simultaneity arguments are not stringent, it is not practical for EOS. Accomplishment of the EOS scientific mission requires the simultaneous measurement of a basic set of earth system science parameters; it also requires that many events be observed by groups of instruments looking through the same atmospheric path.

Scolese, Christopher↗