Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Semar, C. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Semar, C. L..

4 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1976

Injection boundary dynamics during a geomagnetic storm

A series of proton and electron injections were observed by Explorer 45 associated with several substorms during the main phase of the Feb. 24, 1972 geomagnetic storm. The 1- to 290-keV protons and 1- to 560-keV electrons were observed in the evening quadrant up to L of about 5.2. A model distorted dipole magnetic field and McIlwain's E3 convection electric field were used to backtrack the energy-dispersed electron and proton fluxes to their source at the time of injection. The source turns out to be a region extending over several earth radii outside an injection boundary. In the night magnetosphere, the inferred injection boundary is displaced inward with each successive substorm. The energy dispersion plot of the particles injected during orbit 314 indicates that as the energy of the observed particles decreases there is a smooth transition to the position of the plasmapause. This suggests that for that substorm the injection boundary and the plasmapause were one and the same. The proton 'noses' reported by Smith and Hoffman (1974) are discussed.

Konradi, A.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Field-aligned fluxes in the geomagnetic equator

During 12 electron injection events observed by Explorer 45 during the December, 1971, and February, 1972, in magnetic storms it was found that the lowest observable pitch angle particles (down to 7 degrees in one case) arrived first. Pitch angle dispersion and shell-splitting effects are shown to be inadequate explanations for most of these pitch angle distributions. It is suggested that parallel electric fields may be supplying 1- to 5-keV electrons to the magnetosphere from the ionosphere. Various models of parallel electric fields are discussed.

Semar, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Substorm-injected protons and electrons and the injection boundary model

Analysis of observations of substorm-associated enhancements of proton and electron fluxes: (1) makes a strong case for the existence of a boundary limiting the regional particle injection associated with substorms, (2) supports the hypothesis that the injection process is almost instantaneous (less than approximately 5 min), and (3) indicates that the injection takes place within a large region extending at least several earth radii tailward of the injection boundary. The injection boundary model is superior to others in that it simultaneously explains: (1) the drift and energy dispersion of substorm-injected protons between 1 and 30 keV, (2) the relative behavior of protons with 81 deg and 27 deg pitch angles, (3) the absence of observed electrons below 30 keV, and (4) the time dispersion of impulsively injected electrons seen outside the plasmapause.

Konradi, A.↗