Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Shaker, John F.

Publications and source records attributed to Shaker, John F..

Static stability of the Space Station solar array FASTMast structure

The combined loads test of the 3-Bay FASTMast marks the end of the Lewis Research Center (LeRC) effort to characterize the behavior of the principal Space Station solar array support structure. The primary objective of this test and analysis effort was to develop a method to predict structural stability failure modes under flight-like applied loads. Included at the beginning of this report is a brief historical perspective of the hardware design development and FASTMast structural stability problem evolution. Once an understanding of the solution process has been established, test and analysis details are presented and related to the postulated failure theories. The combined load test series subjected the structure to a combination of transverse, moment, and torsion loads similar to that expected in the service environment. Nonlinear finite element (FE) models were developed and large displacement analyses were performed to support the test effort and failure mode predictions. Details of the test configuration as well as test and analysis results are presented. The results were then critiqued to establish valid and successful support of the failure mode assessments. Finally, study conclusions are drawn and recommendations for safe operation of the FASTMast structure are presented for consideration.

Shaker, John F.↗

Static stability of a three-dimensional space truss

In order to deploy large flexible space structures it is necessary to develop support systems that are strong and lightweight. The most recent example of this aerospace design need is vividly evident in the space station solar array assembly. In order to accommodate both weight limitations and strength performance criteria, ABLE Engineering has developed the Folding Articulating Square Truss (FASTMast) support structure. The FASTMast is a space truss/mechanism hybrid that can provide system support while adhering to stringent packaging demands. However, due to its slender nature and anticipated loading, stability characterization is a critical part of the design process. Furthermore, the dire consequences surely to result from a catastrophic instability quickly provide the motivation for careful examination of this problem. The fundamental components of the space station solar array system are the (1) solar array blanket system, (2) FASTMast support structure, and (3) mast canister assembly. The FASTMast once fully deployed from the canister will provide support to the solar array blankets. A unique feature of this structure is that the system responds linearly within a certain range of operating loads and nonlinearly when that range is exceeded. The source of nonlinear behavior in this case is due to a changing stiffness state resulting from an inability of diagonal members to resist applied loads. The principal objective of this study was to establish the failure modes involving instability of the FASTMast structure. Also of great interest during this effort was to establish a reliable analytical approach capable of effectively predicting critical values at which the mast becomes unstable. Due to the dual nature of structural response inherent to this problem, both linear and nonlinear analyses are required to characterize the mast in terms of stability. The approach employed herein is one that can be considered systematic in nature. The analysis begins with one and two-dimensional failure models of the system and its important components. From knowledge gained through preliminary analyses a foundation is developed for three-dimensional analyses of the FASTMast structure. The three-dimensional finite element (FE) analysis presented here involves a FASTMast system one-tenth the size of the actual flight unit. Although this study does not yield failure analysis results that apply directly to the flight article, it does establish a method by which the full-scale mast can be evaluated.

Shaker, John F.↗

Static stability of a three-dimensional space truss

Space station requirements for power have resulted in a need for photovoltaic solar arrays possessing large blanket surface area. However, due to the limited shuttle payload volume solar array designers have been driven to a deployable concept that by nature is extremely flexible. The principal support for this array system is the Folding Articulating Square Truss Mast (FASTMast). In order to accomodate service loads the FASTMast is expected to exhibit nonlinear behavior which could possibly result in structural instability. Presented herein are the results of the Lewis Research Center test and analysis efforts performed in an effort to characterize the FASTMast structural behavior in terms of stability. Results include those obtained from recent nonlinear testing and analysis involving a 1/10 segment of the FASTMast flight article. Implications of these results as they relate to expected behavior of the flight unit will also be discussed.

Shaker, John F.↗

Static Stability of a Three-Dimensional Space Truss

Space Station requirements for power have resulted in a need for photovoltaic solar arrays possessing large blanket surface area. However, due to the limited Shuttle payload volume solar array designers have been driven to a deployable concept that by nature is extremely flexible. The principal support for this array system is the Folding Articulating Square Truss Mast (FASTMast). In order to accommodate service loads the FASTMast is expected to exhibit nonlinear behavior which could possibly result in structural instability. Presented herein are the results of the Lewis Research Center test and analysis efforts performed in an effort to characterize the FASTMast structural behavior in terms of stability. Results include those obtained from recent nonlinear testing and analysis involving a 1/10 segment of the FASTMast flight article. Implications of these results as they relate to expected behavior of the flight unit will also be discussed.

Shaker, John F.↗