Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Sharon Burton

Publications and source records attributed to Sharon Burton.

35 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Simultaneous Aerosol and Ocean Polarimeter Products Using Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Vector Radiative Transfer and Neural Networks: The PACE-MAPP Algorithm

We describe the PACE-MAPP algorithm that simultaneously retrieves aerosol and ocean optical parameters using multiangle and multi-channel polarimeter measurements from the SPEXone, Hyper-Angular Rainbow Polarimeter 2 (HARP2), and Ocean Color Instrument (OCI) instruments onboard the NASA Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, ocean Ecosystem (PACE) observing system PACE-MAPP is adapted from the Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP) Microphysical Aerosol Properties from Polarimetry (RSP-MAPP) algorithm. A key feature of the MAPP family of algorithms is the use of a coupled vector radiative transfer model such that the atmosphere and ocean are always considered together as one system. Consequently, conservation of energy ensures that negative water-leaving radiances do not occur. PACE-MAPP uses optimal estimation to simultaneously characterize the optical and microphysical properties of aerosol and ocean constituents, find the optimal solution, and reliably account for the uncertainties of each parameter. This coupled approach, together with multiangle, multi-channel polarimeter measurements, will enable retrievals of aerosol and water properties across the Earth’s oceans. The PACE-MAPP algorithm provides aerosol and ocean products for both the open ocean and coastal areas and is designed to be accurate, modular, and efficient by using fast neural networks that replace the time-consuming vector radiative transfer calculations. We provide an overview of the PACE-MAPP framework and also describe its modular components including its aerosol and hydrosol models, ocean bio-optical models, and thin cirrus model.

Snorre Stamnes↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Airborne HSRL Assessment of CALIOP Aerosol Extinction Retrievals Constrained by Column AOD

Current operational CALIOP aerosol extinction profile retrievals usually rely on accurately specifying the relationship between aerosol extinction and backscattering (i.e. lidar ratio). Uncertainties in the assigned lidar ratios are typically the largest source of systematic error (~30-50%) in the CALIOP retrievals of aerosol extinction, backscatter, and aerosol optical depth. Alternatively, column aerosol optical depth (AOD) can be used to solve the lidar equation and obtain column-equivalent lidar ratios and retrieve aerosol extinction profiles from the CALIOP attenuated backscatter profiles. These derived lidar ratios correspond to the aerosols in the altitude range from 0-7 km. We derive column-equivalent aerosol lidar ratios and aerosol extinction profiles from CALIOP attenuated backscatter profiles constrained using co-located column AODs provided by several instruments/techniques: Synergized Optical Depth of Aerosols (SODA), Ocean-Derived Column Optical Depths (ODCOD), MODIS (dark target), MODIS (Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction-MAIAC), and PARASOL (Generalized Retrieval of Aerosol and Surface Properties-GRASP). These various retrievals of AOD and the column-average aerosol lidar ratios and aerosol extinction profiles derived from CALIOP using these AOD constraints are evaluated using the extensive record of coincident and co-located airborne HSRL measurements of AOD, aerosol lidar ratio, and aerosol extinction profiles acquired during more than 140 HSRL underflights of CALIPSO since 2006. The HSRL technique allows for the independent measurement of extinction and backscatter without the need for external constraints or assumptions regarding the lidar ratios. Initial comparisons with these coincident HSRL aerosol extinction profiles show that the CALIOP aerosol extinction profiles retrieved using these various AOD constraints are generally in better agreement with the HSRL measurements than aerosol extinction profiles from the operational techniques. The quality of agreement depends on the accuracy and magnitude of the AOD constraint. We present these comparisons of AOD, column aerosol lidar ratio, and aerosol extinction profiles for each of the AOD constraints described above.

lidar↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Evaluation of GEOS Aerosols Using CAMP2Ex Observations

Biomass burning aerosol impacts aspects of the atmosphere and Earth system through direct and semi-direct effects, as well as influencing air quality. Despite its importance, the representation of biomass burning aerosol is not always accurate in numerical weather prediction and climate models or reanalysis products. Using observations collected as part of the Cloud, Aerosol and Monsoon Processes Philippines Experiment (CAMP2Ex) in August through October of 2019, aerosol concentration and optical properties are evaluated within the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) and its underlying aerosol module, GOCART. In the operational configuration, GEOS assimilates aerosol optical depth observations at 550 nm from AERONET and MODIS to constrain aerosol fields. Particularly for biomass burning aerosol, without the assimilation of aerosol optical depth, aerosol extinction is underestimated compared to observations collected in the Philippines region during the CAMP2Ex campaign. The assimilation process adds excessive amounts of carbon to account for the underestimated extinction, resulting in positive biases in the mass of black and organic carbon, especially within the boundary layer, relative to in situ observations from the Langley Aerosol Research Group Experiment. Counteracting this, GEOS is deficient in sulfate and nitrate aerosol just above the boundary layer. Aerosol extinction within GEOS is a function of the mass of different aerosol species, the ambient relative humidity, the assumed spectral optical properties, and particle size distribution per species. The relationship between dry and ambient extinction in GEOS reveals that hygroscopic growth is too high within the model for biomass burning aerosol. An additional concern lies in the assumed particle size distribution for GEOS, which has a single mode radius that is too small for organic carbon. Variability in the observed particle size distribution for biomass burning aerosol within a single flight also illuminates the fact that a single assumed particle size distribution is not sufficient and that for a proper representation, a more advanced aerosol module within GEOS may be necessary.

Allison Collow↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar Measurements of Aerosols over Major Metropolitan Areas

NASA Langley Research Center airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidars have participated in several NASA field missions designed to study air quality over major metropolitan regions. Data from these instruments reveal the temporal and spatial variabilities of aerosol distributions over these urban areas, quantify aerosol backscatter, extinction, and depolarization near the surface, and provide additional relevant information regarding aerosol optical thickness, mixed layer height, and aerosol type. We show that measurements of surface PM2.5 concentrations typically are more directly related to coincident near-surface measurements of aerosol extinction than coincident measurements of aerosol optical thickness.

lidar↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

PM 2.5 Concentrations over Major Metropolitan Regions Inferred from Airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar Measurements Using Machine Learning Regression

We use measurements of near-surface aerosol backscatter, extinction, and depolarization acquired by four NASA Langley Research Center airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidars (HSRLs) to develop a machine learning regression methodology to infer PM2.5 concentrations at the surface and aloft. These airborne HSRL measurements were acquired over major metropolitan regions in the United States and Asia during more than 170 flights since 2010. Hourly surface PM2.5 measurements from the EPA air quality system and similar networks in other countries acquired within 10 km and 15 minutes of these near-surface HSRL measurements are used to train models that compute PM2.5 concentrations from the HSRL measurements. We examine several regression methods and find that exponential Gaussian Process algorithms consistently give the best performance in terms of the lowest root-mean-square (RMS) errors and the highest correlations. Model performance varies significantly depending on various combinations of HSRL aerosol measurements (e.g., aerosol backscatter, extinction, depolarization, backscatter color ratios, lidar ratios, aerosol optical thickness) and retrievals (e.g., mixed layer height, aerosol type) used in the regressions. Models that use near-surface measurements of aerosol backscatter and aerosol intensive properties such as depolarization, backscatter color ratio, and lidar ratio typically give the best performance with RMS errors around 4 mg/m3 and correlation coefficients above 0.9. HSRL measurements were often acquired when the aircraft flew systematic “raster-scan” patterns for several hours over these cities. These flight patterns enabled measurements of the spatial, temporal, and vertical variabilities in the distributions of aerosol backscatter and aerosol intensive properties and allowed us to derive the corresponding variabilities in PM2.5 concentrations. We present examples of such variabilities over urban areas in the United States as well as Asia. We describe also how the distribution of surface PM2.5 varies with aerosol type and use these retrievals to examine model simulations of surface PM2.5 in these metropolitan regions. We also discuss how this methodology may be applied to measurements from satellite lidars such as CALIOP on CALIPSO and ATLID on EarthCARE.

lidar↗