Sheehe, Suzanne | Search NASA

DOE OSTI2024

Quantification of carbon phases in detonation soot

Soot is a powdery substance composed of solid residues that results from the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons. Soot holds valuable information because its chemical makeup can provide answers for condensed carbon kinetics in HE detonations by quantitively identifying what carbon species remain. For carbon-rich explosives, this is particularly important because carbon kinetics is a major pathway for energy release. Current efforts have been able to qualitatively identify the carbons and confirm their presence, but we haven’t been able to successfully quantify them. For example, small angle x-ray diffraction has been fielded to qualitatively identify carbon phases as a function of time during a detonation (work by Trevor Willey and Mike Nielson). Other work (ice experiments) has focused on measuring the “effective” static cold curve equation of state (EOS) of the recovered carbon soots.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

DOE OSTI2023

Sources of error in detonation calorimeters and error analysis for neat 2,4,6-triamino-1,3,5- trinitrobenzene (TATB)

Here, a calorimeter for measuring heats of detonation at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is described. A calibration precision of 0.2 % at the 95 % confidence interval (CI) is reported. Sources of uncertainty are discussed, including nonequivalent sources, which are those arising from differences between calibration and experimental tests. The systematic error due to nonequivalent sources is bounded to 0.19–0.22 % of the measured heat for a standard detonation test where the confinement material is gold. The recommendation is to correct for the systematic error by adding 0.19 % to the reported value and adding 0.03 % to the uncertainty. It is demonstrated that the precision of a detonation test is variable with testing duration because a source of uncertainty resides in the thermodynamic correction factor k6, which accounts for the contribution to heat by stirring; the generated power is additive and therefore highly impacted by total test time. The relative proportion also varies with the magnitude of heat release and sample size, adding variance to the weight of the error arising from the correction factor. A full error analysis based on the described sources of uncertainty is developed. The methodology is applied to a test series on neat 2,4,6-triamino-1,3,5- trinitrobenzene (TATB), demonstrating an ultimate precision of 0.7 % (single test) for materials testing and a relative standard deviation of 1.8 %.

47 OTHER INSTRUMENTATION↗