Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Six, Johan

Publications and source records attributed to Six, Johan.

An interlaboratory comparison of mid-infrared spectra acquisition: Instruments and procedures matter

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy has been extensively employed to deliver timely and cost-effective predictions of a number of soil properties. However, although several soil spectral laboratories have been established worldwide, the distinct characteristics of instruments and operations still hamper further integration and interoperability across mid-infrared (MIR) soil spectral libraries. In this study, we conducted a large-scale ring trial experiment to understand the lab-to-lab variability of multiple MIR instruments. By developing a systematic evaluation of different mathematical treatments with modeling algorithms, including regular preprocessing and spectral standardization, we quantified and evaluated instruments' dissimilarity and how this impacts internal and shared model performance. We found that all instruments delivered good predictions when calibrated internally using the same instruments' characteristics and standard operating procedures by solely relying on regular spectral preprocessing that accounts for light scattering and multiplicative/additive effects, e.g., using standard normal variate (SNV). When performing model transfer from a large public library (the USDA NSSCKSSL MIR library) to secondary instruments, good performance was also achieved by regular preprocessing (e. g., SNV) if both instruments shared the same manufacturer. However, significant differences between the KSSL MIR library and contrasting ring trial instruments responses were evident and confirmed by a semi-unsupervised spectral clustering. For heavily contrasting setups, spectral standardization was necessary before transferring prediction models. Non-linear model types like Cubist and memory-based learning delivered more precise estimates because they seemed to be less sensitive to spectral variations than global partial least square regression. In summary, the results from this study can assist new laboratories in building spectroscopy capacity utilizing existing MIR spectral libraries and support the recent global efforts to make soil spectroscopy universally accessible with centralized or shared operating procedures.

58 GEOSCIENCES↗

What can we learn from N 2 O isotope data? – Analytics, processes and modelling

The isotopic composition of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) provides useful information for evaluating N 2 O sources and budgets. Due to the co–occurrence of multiple N 2 O transformation pathways, it is, however, challenging to use isotopic information to quantify the contribution of distinct processes across variable spatiotemporal scales. Here, we present an overview of recent progress in N 2 O isotopic studies and provide suggestions for future research, mainly focusing on: analytical techniques; production and consumption processes; and interpretation and modelling approaches. Comparing isotope–ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) with laser absorption spectroscopy (LAS), we conclude that IRMS is a precise technique for laboratory analysis of N 2 O isotopes, while LAS is more suitable for in situ/inline studies and offers advantages for site–specific analyses. When reviewing the link between the N 2 O isotopic composition and underlying mechanisms/processes, we find that, at the molecular scale, the specific enzymes and mechanisms involved determine isotopic fractionation effects. In contrast, at plot–to–global scales, mixing of N 2 O derived from different processes and their isotopic variability must be considered. We also find that dual isotope plots are effective for semi–quantitative attribution of co–occurring N 2 O production and reduction processes. More recently, process–based N 2 O isotopic models have been developed for natural abundance and 15 N–tracing studies, and have been shown to be effective, particularly for data with adequate temporal resolution. Here, despite the significant progress made over the last decade, there is still great need and potential for future work, including development of analytical techniques, reference materials and inter–laboratory comparisons, further exploration of N 2 O formation and destruction mechanisms, more observations across scales, and design and validation of interpretation and modelling approaches. Synthesizing all these efforts, we are confident that the N 2 O isotope community will continue to advance our understanding of N 2 O transformation processes in all spheres of the Earth, and in turn to gain improved constraints on regional and global budgets.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗