Engineering topics

Sosa Guitron, Salvador Isaac

Publications and source records attributed to Sosa Guitron, Salvador Isaac.

5 records

DOE OSTI2024

LAMP DTL Scoping Studies (Technical Report)

The present studies are based on the preliminary design efforts, and on the Scoping Studies of the “Strawman” design of LAMP front-end upgrade, referred in the text below to as “Feb.2024 Iteration”, presented in. The main accomplishment of present studies was substantial increase of the fidelity of the beam dynamics simulations in the proposed drift tube linac (DTL). The main accent was on development of the methodology for calculation of the longitudinal (synchrotron) and transverse (betatron) oscillations frequencies (phase advance per focusing period) values and providing the accelerating structure focusing lattice that has safe parameters of such oscillations to avoid unwanted emittance growth and possible beam halo formation. The resulting values of the oscillations phase advances are presented in Table 1, and in Figure 5 in the main body of the report. Special efforts were made to achieve the RF power consumption within limits of the existing RF power system and make sure that DTL fits in the existing tunnel. The LAMP scope does not suggest any additional building and/or tunnel construction. Table 1 summarizes some of these results, as well as Table 3 in the main body of the report.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Start-to-end simulation for LAMP front-end scoping studies

We present a design of a new front end in support of the LANSCE Modernization Project (LAMP). This is an updated front-end design that can largely meet LAMP threshold needs. The first half of this report details each section of the front end, including a summary of the physics design and function. The second half simulates several beam formats from the initial source all the way through the final DTL section (i.e. start-to-end simulations). Details and assumptions are described. The following table summarizes the key results for the different beam formats from this study.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2024

LAMP RFQ vane tip macro-based 3D modeling

This report covers the workflow and the demonstration of modeling the radiofrequency quadrupole (RFQ) vane tip geometry in 3D, for the Front End Upgrade of the LANSCE Modernization Project (LAMP). The goal is to develop an automated procedure to generate the 3D model of the LAMP RFQ vane tip geometry, so as to eliminate the need to manually enter the design parameters for each RFQ cell, when building the 3D model. With the developed procedure, the LAMP RFQ design optimization work can be significantly more efficient.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Modeling LANSCE Line D and RI Beamlines in Elegant and Impact-T

This technical report describes models in Elegant and Impact-T of two LANSCE high-energy beamlines: LineD and Ring Injection. These two beamlines transport the 800 MeV H- beam from the exit of the 805 MHz Linac to the entrance of the PSR. Computer models of all LANSCE high-energy beamlines exist in Transport but include a limited model of the space charge forces. A motivation for using Elegant as an optional beam dynamics code is that the existing model of the PSR is in Elegant, therefore enabling the modeling of the full beam injection scheme. Also, Elegant is a modern code being used by a large accelerator physics community which makes the calculation results more reliable. The drawback is that Elegant has also a limited space charge force model. Therefore, we have opted to include the Particle-In-Cell (PIC) code Impact-T as an alternate beam dynamics code to verify the Elegant calculations. We will use the new Line D and RI models to study beam halo in the transport leading into the PSR, and to evaluate collimation schemes as part of the PSR upgrade. The new models can also be readily used in support of other LANSCE activities.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Collimation Systems for the PSR

This note provides a review of collimator systems being used or considered in high-intensity proton accelerators like SNS, J-PARC, LHC, and PIP-II. These facilities use collimators to remove beam halo, restrict transverse size and momentum in the beam to constrain beam losses around collimators and minimize beam losses downstream, particularly losses arising from particles missing the design location at the stripping foil when injected into the proton storage ring. Collimators are placed either in the transport injection lines (single-pass collimators) or in the rings (multi-pass collimators). Collimators in the transport line are placed around stripping foils in H- accelerators, allowing the beamline optics to get rid of the unstripped protons into well localized absorbers. Rings and proton accelerators mostly rely on tungsten scrapers and collimators in a multi-stage configuration to clean the scattered beam particles mainly responsible for heavy losses at high energies. Placement of the collimators is carefully chosen in terms of the right phase advance to maximize the collimating efficiency, whether the collimation is intended to match an injection stripping foil or a downstream acceptance. Collimation systems are designed with the specific concerns of each facility in mind, although all of them prioritize the minimization of activation due to beam losses to enable hands-on access during maintenance periods. At LANSCE, there are no high-energy collimators, although pairs of horizontal and vertical jaws are routinely used in the LEBT to clean and control the transverse beam profile delivered downstream. This report will help in understanding, together with the beam dynamics simulations, which collimation schemes would be most effective for the PSR upgrade. For example, SNS designed off-momentum collimators to be placed in a 90° arc bend, a high-dispersion region in the beam injection line, very similar to the bend at Line D in LANSCE. This system was very effective at minimizing losses during injection into the SNS accumulator ring and is being re-designed for future operation.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗