Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Sosnick, Tobin R.

Publications and source records attributed to Sosnick, Tobin R..

How hydrophobicity, side chains, and salt affect the dimensions of disordered proteins

Abstract Despite the generally accepted role of the hydrophobic effect as the driving force for folding, many intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), including those with hydrophobic content typical of foldable proteins, behave nearly as self‐avoiding random walks (SARWs) under physiological conditions. Here, we tested how temperature and ionic conditions influence the dimensions of the N‐terminal domain of pertactin (PNt), an IDP with an amino acid composition typical of folded proteins. While PNt contracts somewhat with temperature, it nevertheless remains expanded over 10–58°C, with a Flory exponent, ν , >0.50. Both low and high ionic strength also produce contraction in PNt, but this contraction is mitigated by reducing charge segregation. With 46% glycine and low hydrophobicity, the reduced form of snow flea anti‐freeze protein (red‐sfAFP) is unaffected by temperature and ionic strength and persists as a near‐SARW, ν ~ 0.54, arguing that the thermal contraction of PNt is due to stronger interactions between hydrophobic side chains. Additionally, red‐sfAFP is a proxy for the polypeptide backbone, which has been thought to collapse in water. Increasing the glycine segregation in red‐sfAFP had minimal effect on ν . Water remained a good solvent even with 21 consecutive glycine residues ( ν > 0.5), and red‐sfAFP variants lacked stable backbone hydrogen bonds according to hydrogen exchange. Similarly, changing glycine segregation has little impact on ν in other glycine‐rich proteins. These findings underscore the generality that many disordered states can be expanded and unstructured, and that the hydrophobic effect alone is insufficient to drive significant chain collapse for typical protein sequences.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Protein folds vs. protein folding: Differing questions, different challenges

We report protein fold prediction using deep-learning artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed the field of protein structure prediction. By combining physical and geometric constraints—and especially patterns extracted from the Protein Data Bank —these machine learning algorithms can predict protein structures at or near atomic resolution and do so in seconds. Today, these computational methods have now solved more than 200 million protein structures, which are accessible from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. This accomplishment seems all the more remarkable because few thought it possible or saw it coming. Deservedly, deep-learning AI was named Science magazine’s 2021 “breakthrough of the year”. Clearly, deep-learning AI represents a major advance in protein fold prediction.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗