Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Standish, E. M., Jr.

Publications and source records attributed to Standish, E. M., Jr..

At least 19 records

Mercury's Global Topography from Radar Ranging Data

When Mercury's radius is expanded in Legendre functions to the second degree and order, the systematic error in radar ranging data is reduced substantially. Previously, data spanning an observing interval from 1966 to 1990 were used to infer an equatorial ellipticity (a - b)/a = (540 +/- 54) X 10(exp -6) and a center-of-figure minus center-of-mass offset of (640 +/- 78) m. The magnitude of this equatorial center of figure offset implies an excess crustal thickness of 12 km or less, comparable to the Moon's excess. By comparing the equatorial ellipticity with the Mariner 10 gravity field, and assuming Airy isostatic compensation, bounds on crustal thickness can be derived. Mercury's crustal thickness is in the range from 100 to 300 km. The Mercury radar ranging observing interval has been extended from 1966 to the present. In addition, improvements in data reduction techniques have resulted in a set of Mercury ranging data less affected by systematic error, in particular the biases introduced by local topographic variations. We use this new set of reduced ranging data to improve Mercury's global topography and center-of-figure minus center-of-mass offset. New results on crustal thickness are derived, and prospects for further improvement with Mercury Orbiter data are discussed.

Anderson, J. D.↗

Determination of the extragalactic-planetary frame tie from joint analysis of radio interferometric and lunar laser ranging measurements

Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) observations of extragalactic radio sources provide the basis for defining an accurate non-rotating reference frame in terms of angular positions of the sources. Measurements of the distance from the Earth to the Moon and to the inner planets provide the basis for defining an inertial planetary ephemeris reference frame. The relative orientation, or frame tie, between these two reference frames is of interest for combining Earth orientation measurements, for comparing Earth orientation results with theories referred to the mean equator and equinox, and for determining the positions of the planets with respect to the extragalactic reference frame. This work presents an indirect determination of the extragalactic-planetary frame tie from a combined reduction of VLBI and Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) observations. For this determination, data acquired by LLR tracking stations since 1969 have been analyzed and combined with 14 years of VLBI data acquired by NASA's Deep Space Network since 1978. The frame tie derived from this joint analysis, with an accuracy of 0.003 sec, is the most accurate determination obtained so far. This result, combined with a determination of the mean ecliptic (defined in the rotating sense), shows that the mean equinox of epoch J2000 is offset from the x-axis of the extragalactic frame adopted by the International Earth Rotation Service for astrometric and geodetic applications by 0.078 sec +/- 0.010 sec along the y-direction and y 0.019 sec +/- 0.001 sec. along the z-direction.

Folkner, W. M.↗

Planet X - No dynamical evidence in the optical observations

It is shown that the alleged 'unexplained anomalies in the motion of Uranus' disappear when one properly accounts for the correct value of the mass of Neptune and properly adjusts the orbit of Uranus to the observational data. Also, it is shown that each of the 'irregularities in the measured positions of Neptune' has a complete explanation within the framework of the presently known solar system. As a check of certainty, an actual planetary ephemeris is integrated which well fits the observations of Uranus. Minor systematic errors do remain in the data, but they are very small; they are easily explained by a number of uncertainties in the observations themselves. There is now known to be a mass concentration of significant size in the outer solar system - 1992 QB1. In comparison to any of the major planets, though, this object is miniscule. For the meridian circle observations, there is still no evidence which requires or even indicates the existence of any planet-sized object; there remains no need to hypothesize the existence of a tenth planet in the solar system.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

The observational basis for JPL's DE 200, the planetary ephemerides of the Astronomical Almanac

This paper documents the planetary observational data used in a series of ephemerides produced at JPL over six years preceding the creation of DE118/LE62, the set which transformed directly into the JD2000-based set, DE200/LE200. Details of the data reduction procedures are presented, and techniques to overcome the uncertainties due to planetary topography are described. For the spacecraft data, the basic reductions are augmented by formulations for locating the transponder, whether in orbit or landed on the surface of a planet.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

An approximation to the outer planet ephemeris errors in JPL's DE 200

The outer planet positions of JPL's recent planetary ephemeris, DE 202, have begun to show significant differences from DE 200, the basic ephemeris of the major national almanacs. The differences DE 202 - DE 200 are plotted and are assumed to approximate the errors of DE 200. For Jupiter, the difference in right ascension varies over the planet's 12 yr period between -0.1 and -0.2 arcsec throughout the century; for Saturn, the right ascension also varies over the 30 yr period, but in addition, shows a drift which reaches -0.25 arcsec at present; for Uranus, the difference is small through the first half of the century, but now has reached -0.4 arcsec; for Neptune, the error was +0.6 arcsec at 1900 and is near -1.0 arcsec by the year 2000; the error for Pluto exceeds +2.0 arcsec by the end of the century and is rapidly increasing. The declination errors are generally periodic and smaller than the right ascensions.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

On the orientation of ephemeris reference frames

Precession corrections, equinox motions and locations, and obliquities for the FK4 are determined from laser-ranging data only by the ephemeris-fitting method of Standish (1982) and compared with those calculated by Fricke (1971 and 1982) from optical observations. The theoretical basis of the comparison is explained, and the results are presented in a table. No significant differences are found in the equinox offset and equinox motion values, and good agreement is found in the equinox location. The ephemeris-fitting obliquity values are shown to be consistent to within 10 marcsec and to be about 20 marcsec lower than the optical values.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

The JPL 'long ephemeris', DE102/LE51

A number of applications exist in astronomical research for planetary and lunar ephemerides covering an extended length of time. This paper discusses such a set of ephemerides, DE102/LE51, produced at JPL, covering the time 1411 B.C. to 3001 A.D. The ephemerides are dynamically self-consistent, in that the equations of motion were integrated simultaneously. They also represent the most accurately known positions covering such a time span. They have already been used by a number of different users in a variety of different applications.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

Conversion of positions and proper motions from B1950.0 to the IAU system at J2000.0

The complete transformation of positions and proper motions from B1950.0 to J2000.0 on the basis of IAU recommendations including the transition from FK4 to FK5 equinox may be rigorously accomplished with a simple vector equation. The equation is first presented in this paper and then subsequently derived. The transformation of the FK4 to FK5 system described by functions f(alpha, delta, m) is in preparation in Heidelberg.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

Orientation of the JPL Ephemerides, DE 200/LE 200, to the dynamical equinox of J 2000

The lunar and planetary ephemerides, DE 200/LE 200 have been recently produced at JPL. They will form the basis of the ephemerides in the 'Astronomical Almanac' starting in the year 1984. The origin has been referenced to the J 2000 dynamical equinox of the ephemerides themselves. The procedure for this orientation is described here in detail. Analyses of the ephemerides also provide comparisons with the equinox of the FK 4 and with presently adopted values for the earth's obliquity.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

The JPL planetary ephemerides

JPL ephemerides are discussed, with emphasis on what they represent and which aspects are well-determined. The determination of planetary ephemerides using spacecraft ranging data, radar ranging data, lunar laser ranging data, and optical transit data, is examined. Numerical estimates are presented, expected progress in the future is briefly considered, and possible uses for the ephemerides are discussed.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

Development ephemeris number 96

Program tape contains two files: file one contains all software necessary to create binary file and perform ephemeris calculation on that file; file two of distributed tape contains encoded ephemeris data. These data are essentially a blocked listing of complete dump of original binary tape, with double precision data modified to special form.

Keesey, M. S. W.↗

On the stability of the solutions of the general problem of three bodies

The extent through which the initial conditions of a given three-body system may be varied without completely changing the qualitative nature of the subsequent system evolution is investigated. It is assumed that the three masses are equal, all initial velocities are zero, the first two bodies initially lie on the x-axis, and the position of the third body is confined to a specific region of space. Analysis of the system evolution for different initial positions of the third body shows that there is a whole area or 'island' in the x-y plane throughout which the initial position of the third body may be moved in a continuous fashion to produce an evolution which also changes in a continuous manner. A Monte Carlo approach is adopted to determine the full extent of this island in the general problem. It is concluded that the stability of a full solution may be directly related to the size of its island in phase space.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

Tests of general relativity using astrometric and radiometric observations of the planets

Current least squares fits to solar system data, including transit circle observations of the terrestrial and giant planets, radar observations of the terrestrial planets, Mariner 9 range fixes to Mars, and Pioneer 10/11 range fixes to Jupiter, have yielded some new results of interest to experimental relativity. Solutions have been obtained for the parameterized post-Newtonian (PPN) parameters beta and gamma, the solar gravitational quadrupole moment J2, a time variation in the gravitational constant G, and four Nordtvedt parameters.

Anderson, J. D.↗

JPL Development Ephemeris number 96

The fourth issue of JPL Planetary Ephemerides, designated JPL Development Ephemeris No. 96 (DE96), is described. This ephemeris replaces a previous issue which has become obsolete since its release in 1969. Improvements in this issue include more recent and more accurate observational data, new types of data, better processing of the data, and refined equations of motion which more accurately describe the actual physics of the solar system. The descriptions in this report include these new features as well as the new export version of the ephemeris. The tapes and requisite software will be distributed through the NASA Computer Software Management and Information Center (COSMIC) at the University of Georgia.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

The figure of Mars and its effect on radar-ranging.

Formulae are given which indicate the errors made in computing the radar-range to a planet when one assumes the planet to have a spherical surface, centered at the center of mass. These formulae are evaluated for Mars, using an ellipsoidal fit of the martian surface obtained from the occultation measurements of the Mariner 9 spacecraft. The secularlike part of the errors amounts to about 4 km in range over the past 3 oppositions, due mainly to the flattening of 0.006 and to a 3 km southerly displacement of the center of figure from the center of mass. The method of solution is given in the appendix along with a method for applying the ellipsoidal model to the reduction of radar-range data.

Standish, E. M., Jr.↗

Further periodic solutions of the three-dimensional restricted problem. II.

Discrepancies between a previous paper on the subject by the authors and work by Kozai are investigated. More accurate figures are presented for 23 values of the mean motion, giving combinations of eccentricity and inclination which can be continued to periodic three-dimensional orbits.

Jefferys, W. H.↗