Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Stefan Bieniawski

Publications and source records attributed to Stefan Bieniawski.

10 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2022

Blue Origin De-orbit Descent and Landing Tipping Point: Program Final Report

The purpose of this document is to provide a final report on the Deorbit, Descent, and Landing (DDL) Tipping Point program, a public-private partnership between Blue Origin and NASA that is partially funded by NASA contract 80LARC19C0005. In this report we summarize the results of the entire contract, including recommendations and conclusions based on the experience and results obtained. Only the portions funded by the government with associated unlimited rights are documented in detail in this report. For the work funded by Blue Origin, summaries with unlimited rights are provided for context and completeness. The Blue Origin funded work exceeded 25% of the originally proposed total program cost and included a mixture of hardware procurement and critical technology maturation. The scope of this document is a discussion of all the major tasks performed under the contract including the sensor flight demonstrations on New Shepard, the hardware in the loop lunar landing navigator demonstration, and the ground testing of the Flash LiDAR hazard sensor. The contributions from the multiple NASA teams – Johnson Space Center, Langley Research Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, and Jet Propulsion Laboratory – are described along with the contributions from Blue Origin. This document is the Final Report for statement of work item 4.1.2.10 as Deliverable 5.8.

Stefan Bieniawski↗
NASA NTRS2022

Performance of Flash Lidar with Real-time Image Enhancement Algorithm for Landing Hazard Avoidance

Performance of a 3-D imaging flash lidar employing a novel super-resolution algorithm is characterized by a series of static and dynamic tests. A gantry test of this lidar in which the lidar was placed in an instrumented moving basket above a calibrated hazard field proved an excellent demonstration of hazard avoidance capabilities. Results of the gantry test are reported and potential of flash lidar utilizing super-resolution algorithm for future landing missions are explained.

Hazard Detection↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Post-Flight Performance Analysis of Navigation and Advanced Guidance Algorithms on a Terrestrial Suborbital Rocket Flight

There is currently renewed interest in robotic and crewed landers for a return to the lunar surface. Advanced guidance and navigation algorithms are essential to accurately delivering cargo and crew safely to the moon successfully. This paper reports the overall performance of an integrated set of navigation and guidance algorithms flown on a terrestrial suborbital rocket up to an altitude of approximately 100km. The navigation algorithm consists of an onboard extended Kalman Filter (EKF) that ingests multiple sensor measurements, one of which is the output from a terrain relative navigation (TRN) algorithm that cross-references camera images to on-board satellite imagery to perform feature correlation within the camera image. The guidance algorithm solves for a 6-degree-of-freedom (DoF) optimal trajectory using a successive convexification method during powered descent. The altitude range as well as the landing dynamics experienced during this test flight are realistic for an extraterrestrial landing and provide an invaluable data set to gauge the current development of these landing algorithms in an effort to advance the overall software readiness levels (SRL). This paper will delve into different aspects of each algorithm and present an analysis of the in-flight performance of the algorithms. This flight was conducted under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Safe and Precise Landing Integrated Capabilities Evolution (SPLICE) project focused on technology advancement for landing applications.

Guidance↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Implementation of a Six Degree of Freedom Precision Lunar Landing Algorithm Using Dual Quaternion Representation

In this study, a powered descent guidance algorithm using a unit dual quaternion represen- tation of the vehicle dynamics is implemented in a high-fidelity simulation and on representative flight hardware. This Dual-Quaternion Guidance (DQG) algorithm is applied to the precision lunar landing problem which levies complex constraints upon the trajectory, including state triggered attitude constraints to enable terrain-relative navigation and hazard detection as well as real-time requirements for landing site re-designation. The investigation explores DQG’s usefulness as a mission design tool as well as a real-time guidance algorithm and defines real-time performance requirements for the hazard detection and avoidance (HDA) re-targeting phase of precision lunar landing. The experiment is presented in two parts. First, DQG is implemented within a high-fidelity Monte Carlo simulation to tune the algorithm’s parameters for the simulated vehicle, to refine the mission design, and to develop guidance update timing requirements to perform the HDA maneuver. DQG generates trajectories online for the divert which are tracked by the vehicle’s inner-loop controllers to the targeted landing site. Second, DQG is run on representative hardware to demonstrate real-time operation through a divert maneuver. These results allow for rapid, flexible, optimal mission design satisfying complex constraints, and for the definition of real-time performance requirements for the HDA operations inherent in precision lunar landing. The HDA divert maneuver is found to require guidance trajectory updates in less than three seconds. DQG is found to be too slow to meet this update timing on the descent and landing computer (DLC) in its current implementation. DQG running on alternative hardware can meet the update rate requirement. Algorithm implementation improvements are also recommended which are expected to speed up computation sufficiently to meet requirements on the DLC.

GN&C↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Robust Cislunar Trajectory Optimization Via Midcourse Correction and Optical Navigation Scheduling

This paper presents a new approach to optimal trajectory design that considers uncertainties in the system, referred to herein as robust trajectory optimization. This approach assumes an existing reference trajectory and optimizes the locations of midcourse correction burns and utilization of onboard navigation sensors to minimize dispersions in ∆v or final position. Navigation errors, maneuver execution errors, orbit insertion errors, and environmental modeling errors are considered. The application in this paper is cislunar flight with the goal of injecting into a Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit for rendezvous with a target vehicle. Two complementary optimization problems are proposed. One problem minimizes the total ∆v dispersion subject to a final position dispersion constraint. The other problem minimizes the final position dispersion subject to a total ∆v dispersion constraint. The results from each optimization problem are shown for a complete mission profile.

Linear Covariance Analysis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Robust Trajectory Optimization and GN&C Performance Analysis for NRHO Rendezvous

This paper evaluates several candidate Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbits (NRHO) rendezvous trajectory designs using linear covariance (LinCov) analysis and determines the optimal locations for NRHO rendezvous translational maneuver locations. The performance of several candidate relative trajectory designs are determined as a function of relative navigation accuracy (angles only), inertial optical navigation (OpNav), range observability maneuvers, maneuver execution errors, relative maneuver targeting, and environment uncertainties. Further, the optimal locations of rendezvous maneuvers are determined for each of the candidate reference trajectories. The long-term goal of this research is to utilize LinCov and a genetic optimization algorithm (GA) to determine a complete end-to-end optimal NRHO trajectory design that is robust to navigation errors, maneuver execution errors, and environment uncertainties. This paper represents a first step toward this goal. Three candidate rendezvous trajectories with varying numbers of range-observability maneuvers are evaluated for their robustness to uncertainties, errors, and total trajectory correction delta-v performance. Some key elements of this analysis include relative navigation performance in an NRHO, relative trajectory dispersion performance, and total 3-sigma delta-v performance. This development provides the foundation to then determine an optimal and robust end-to-end NRHO rendezvous trajectory, including the determination of the optimal locations of range observability maneuvers, if needed.

Linear Covariance Analysis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Sensitivity of Optimal Midcourse Correction Scheduling for Robust Cislunar Trajectory Design

A new approach to optimal trajectory design is the determination of optimal trajectories that are robust to initial trajectory dispersions, navigation errors, maneuver execution errors, and environment modeling errors. This paper investigates the sensitivity of cislunar robust optimal trajectory design to launch date, duration of navigation measurement passes, and navigation measurement frequency. For a given cislunar trajectory from translunar injection (TLI) to lunar orbit insertion (LOI), the optimal locations of midcourse corrections, also known as trajectory correction maneuvers (TCM) are determined by minimizing the final 3-σ ∆v subject to a final 3-σ position dispersion constraint for a given launch date, specified measurement pass duration prior to each maneuver, and measurement frequency. Optical navigation (OpNav) is assumed, and OpNav field-of-view (FOV) and lighting constraints are employed. These constraints turn out to be important elements of the problem. The sensitivity of the optimal TCM locations are then investigated by varying the launch date, duration of OpNav measurement passes, and the OpNav measurement frequency, and then re-optimizing the locations of the TCMs. Given the problem parameters provided herein, results show that while the optimal TCM locations with respect to TLI vary greatly from one launch date to another, their locations with respect to LOI are nearly invariant over a 2-month launch window. Results also show that in all cases the optimal location of the last TCM is found to be at the point where the OpNav lunar FOV constraint is first violated. For all other TCMs, OpNav measurement pass duration and measurement frequency can have a moderate to large affect on the optimal TCM locations.

Linear Covariance Analysis↗