Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Steinke, R. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Steinke, R. J..

11 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1988

The design and development of transonic multistage compressors

The development of the transonic multistage compressor is reviewed. Changing trends in design and performance parameters are noted. These changes are related to advances in compressor aerodynamics, computational fluid mechanics and other enabling technologies. The parameters normally given to the designer and those that need to be established during the design process are identified. Criteria and procedures used in the selection of these parameters are presented. The selection of tip speed, aerodynamic loading, flowpath geometry, incidence and deviation angles, blade/vane geometry, blade/vane solidity, stage reaction, aerodynamic blockage, inlet flow per unit annulus area, stage/overall velocity ratio, and aerodynamic losses are considered. Trends in these parameters both spanwise and axially through the machine are highlighted. The effects of flow mixing and methods for accounting for the mixing in the design process are discussed.

Ball, C. L.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Predicting the Performance of an Axial-Flow Compressor

Stage-stacking computer code (STGSTK) developed for predicting off-design performance of multi-stage axial-flow compressors. Code uses meanline stagestacking method. Stage and cumulative compressor performance calculated from representative meanline velocity diagrams located at rotor inlet and outlet meanline radii. Numerous options available within code. Code developed so user modify correlations to suit their needs.

Steinke, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1982

STGSTK: A computer code for predicting multistage axial flow compressor performance by a meanline stage stacking method

A FORTRAN computer code is presented for off-design performance prediction of axial-flow compressors. Stage and compressor performance is obtained by a stage-stacking method that uses representative velocity diagrams at rotor inlet and outlet meanline radii. The code has options for: (1) direct user input or calculation of nondimensional stage characteristics; (2) adjustment of stage characteristics for off-design speed and blade setting angle; (3) adjustment of rotor deviation angle for off-design conditions; and (4) SI or U.S. customary units. Correlations from experimental data are used to model real flow conditions. Calculations are compared with experimental data.

Steinke, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Aerodynamic performance of a 1.35-pressure-ratio axial-flow fan stage

The overall blade element performances and the aerodynamic design parameters are presented for a 1.35-pressure-ratio fan stage. The fan stage was designed for a weight flow of 32.7 kilograms per second and a tip speed of 302.8 meters per second. At design speed the stage peak efficiency of 0.879 occurred at a pressure ratio of 1.329 and design flow. Stage stall margin was approximately 14 percent. At design flow rotor efficiency was 0.94 and the pressure ratio was 1.360.

Osborn, W. M.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Stalled and stall-free performance of axial-flow compressor stage with three inlet-guide-vane and stator-blade settings

The performance of the first stage of a transonic, multistage compressor was mapped over a range of inlet-guide-vane and stator-blade settings. Both stall-free and deep-stall performance data were obtained. For the settings tested, as stall was encountered and flow was further reduced, a relatively sharp drop in pressure ratio occurred and was followed by a continuing but more gradual reduction in pressure ratio with reduced flow. The position of the stall line on the map of pressure ratio against equivalent weight flow was essentially unaffected over the range of inlet-guide-vane and stator-blade settings.

Urasek, D. C.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Performance of inlet stage of transonic compressor

The overall and blade-element performances are presented over the stable flow operating range of the stage at the design tip speed of 426 m/sec. Stage peak efficiency of 0.83 was obtained at a weight flow of 28.8 kg/sec and a pressure ratio of 1.52. The stall margin for the stage was 8 percent based on weight flow and pressure ratio at peak efficiency and stall. The rotor appears to be stalling prematurely as evidenced by high rotor tip losses.

Urasek, D. C.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Performance of low-pressure-ratio low-tip-speed fan stage with blade tip solidity of 0.65

The overall and blade-element performance of a low pressure ratio, low tip speed fan stage is presented over the stable operating range at rotative speeds from 90 to 120 percent of design speed. Stage peak efficiency of 0.927 was obtained at a weight flow of 32.4 kg/sec (190.31 kg/sec/sq m of annulus area) and a pressure ratio of 1.134. The stall margin at design speed and peak efficiency was 15.3 percent.

Kovich, G.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Performance of a 1.15-pressure-ratio axial-flow fan stage with a blade tip solidity of 0.5

The overall and blade-element performance of a low-solidity, low-pressure-ratio, low-tip-speed fan stage is presented over the stable operating range at rotative speeds from 90 to 120 percent of design speed. At design speed a stage peak efficiency of 0.836 was obtained at a weight flow of 30.27 kilograms per second and a pressure ratio of 1.111. The pressure ratio was less than design pressure ratio, and the design energy input into the rotor was not achieved. A mismatch of the rotor and stator blade elements resulted due to the lower than design pressure ratio of the rotor.

Osborn, W. M.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Aerodynamic performance of a 1.25-pressure-ratio axial-flow fan stage

Aerodynamic design parameters and overall and blade-element performances of a 1.25-pressure-ratio fan stage are reported. Detailed radial surveys were made over the stable operating flow range at rotative speeds from 70 to 120 percent of design speed. At design speed, the measured stage peak efficiency of 0.872 occurred at a weight flow of 34.92 kilograms per second and a pressure ratio of 1.242. Stage stall margin is about 20 percent based on the peak efficiency and stall conditions. The overall peak efficiency for the rotor was 0.911. The overall stage performance showed no significant change when the stators were positioned at 1, 2, or 4 chords downstream of the rotor.

Moore, R. D.↗