Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Stephen J Hoffman

Publications and source records attributed to Stephen J Hoffman.

14 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2024

Development of a Surface Water Transportation System for ISRU Operations on Mars

NASA is working to define the architecture needed for a Mars exploration campaign. Initial analysis assumptions allow for pre-deployment of essential cargo and equipment to support a crew landing, including the pre-positioning of a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV). This MAV is likely to represent the largest single payload that must be landed on the Mars surface. Its size would be influenced by the amount of mass that state-of-the-art Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) systems would be capable of placing on Mars. One possible method of increasing the usable size of the MAV without exceeding available EDL capabilities is to land the MAV without ascent propellant on board. Following such a method may necessitate a strategy to acquire sufficient ascent propellant to allow a crew to safely depart the Martian surface. This paper describes a conceptual return propellant strategy that uses a liquid transportation skid, or pallet, to be used in conjunction with a rover mobility system to transfer water across the Martian surface from a source point to an in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) plant that would use this water as a feedstock to generate oxygen and methane to enable launch of the MAV. Design considerations, concept of operations, and rover energetics will be discussed in this paper.

Fluid Structure Interface↗
NASA NTRS2022

NASA’s Strategic Analysis Cycle 2021 (SAC21) Human Mars Architecture

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Mars Architecture Team (MAT) was challenged to develop a mission architecture capable of transporting humans to the surface of Mars and back as fast—and as soon—as practical. This challenge represented a significant departure from previous approaches that minimized Earth-launched mass and maximized in-space transportation efficiency, often resulting in roundtrip missions of three years or more in duration. In the interest of crew health, MAT’s cross-Agency team of subject matter experts was challenged to develop an architecture capable of shortening crew time away from Earth to about two years. MAT was given specific mission constraints, such as number of crew, as well as mandates to minimize surface infrastructure as much as possible and to incorporate nuclear transportation options. The resulting MAT-developed concept, referred to here as the Strategic Analysis Cycle 2021 (SAC21) architecture, leverages Artemis elements and emerging commercial capabilities for cargo and logistics launches, and features a hybrid Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP)/Chemical transportation system able to complete the 1.8 billion kilometer round-trip journey to Mars and back in 760 to 850 days transit time for the 2039 Earth departure opportunity. Three Mars Descent Systems (MDS), each capable of landing about 25 metric tons of useful cargo on the surface of Mars, would be pre-deployed in advance of crew departure from Earth; two of these MDS’s would deliver a partially fueled Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), a fission power system, surface mobility, and additional MAV propellant. To minimize surface infrastructure, only two of the four Mars crew would descend and live in an MDS-landed pressurized rover, exploring the martian surface for 30 martian days, or sols, before returning to Mars orbit aboard their MAV and rejoining the other two crew on the Deep Space Transport for the Earth return voyage. Specifics of many of these architecture elements are detailed in separate technical publications; this paper outlines the end-to-end integrated architecture performance and concept of operations, including synergies with Artemis lunar architecture elements. It is important to note that NASA does not have a formal human Mars program and no decisions have been made; the architecture described here is intended to fill in an often-overlooked corner of the trade space, helping to complete the menu of options available to decision-makers as they chart the course for humans to Mars.

exploration↗
NASA NTRS2022

Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization

This document details constraints and considerations in planning daily activity timelines for crewed exploration on Mars. This work was done for the purpose of estimating how much time during each Martian day (hereafter referred to as a sol) might be available for exploration activities, (also referred to as utilization activities in this document), after accounting for crew and equipment care. These results become part of the factors taken into consideration as specific goals and objectives are assembled into a mission plan.

Stephen J Hoffman↗
NASA NTRS2020

Mars Rodwell Experiment Final Report

Developed by Army engineer Raul Rodriguez at Camp Century in Greenland during the early 1960s, a Rodriguez Well uses heat exchangers and a submersible pump to create a cavity deep under a glacier’s surface and cycle the heated water up an ice shaft, siphoning a portion of the flow for consumption before sending the rest back down to the well. To evaluate the performance of a Rodriguez Well as one of multiple approaches for extracting water from massive ice deposits on Mars, a series of tests were performed at the Johnson Space Center (JSC) Energy Systems Test Area (ESTA) Facility under Martian equivalent environmental factors such as atmospheric and water surface pressure and density. These values were then used to create an energy balance model for a Martian Rodriguez Well, replacing the terrestrial environmental factors with the found Martian equivalents in a computer model published by the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). This report documents the test results and the subsequent findings from running the modified code.

Mars↗
NASA NTRS2010

Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0

This paper provides a summary of the 2007 Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0 (DRA 5.0), which is the latest in a series of NASA Mars reference missions. It provides a vision of one potential approach to human Mars exploration including how Constellation systems can be used. The reference architecture provides a common framework for future planning of systems concepts, technology development, and operational testing as well as Mars robotic missions, research that is conducted on the International Space Station, and future lunar exploration missions. This summary the Mars DRA 5.0 provides an overview of the overall mission approach, surface strategy and exploration goals, as well as the key systems and challenges for the first three human missions to Mars.

Bret G Drake↗
NASA NTRS1997

Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team

Personnel representing several NASA field centers have formulated a "Reference Mission" addressing human exploration of Mars. This report summarizes their work and describes a plan for the first human missions to Mars, using approaches that are technically feasible, have reasonable risks, and have relatively low costs. The architecture for the Mars Reference Mission builds on previous work of the Synthesis Group (1991) and Zubrin's (1991) concepts for the use of propellants derived from the Martian Atmosphere. In defining the Reference Mission, choices have been made. In this report, the rationale for each choice is documented; however, unanticipated technology advances or political decisions might change the choices in the future.

Stephen J Hoffman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mars Water Well Performance: Experimental Heat Transfer Results Supporting Simulations

Favorable indications of massive quantities of water on Mars have initiated studies of potential changes to human Mars missions. Using a technique known as a Rodriguez Well to melt the ice, store the resulting water in a subsurface ice cavity until needed, and then pump water to the surface for use is one potential means to effect these changes. A computer simulation of the Rodriguez Well in a terrestrial environment is one of the engineering tools being used to characterize the performance of this type of well on Mars. An experiment at the NASA Johnson Space Center gathered data for evaporation rates and convective heat transfer at Mars surface conditions so that this computer simulation could be appropriately modified to predict performance on Mars. Tests have indicated that a pool of water can be maintained at 1°C to 2° C while at Mars surface temperatures and pressures. Preliminary results for evaporation rates and convective heat transfer have been determined and are presented.

Stephen J Hoffman↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization

This paper describes the current reference being used by NASA for the surface exploration portion of a human Mars mission architecture, documented in HEOMD-415. (It is important to note that no decisions have been made by NASA regarding human Mars mission objectives, durations, or architectures, and this document is intended to aid in analysis of options.) The HEOMD-415 report details constraints and considerations in planning daily activity timelines for crewed exploration on Mars. This work was done for the purpose of estimating how much time during each martian sol might be available for exploration activities, (also referred to as utilization activities in this document), after accounting for time needed for crew and equipment care. The report describes activities, on a sol-by-sol basis, for a surface exploration mission with a total duration of 30 sols on the surface. At the conclusion of this description, the total amount of time used in the activities is presented, summarized into relevant mission planning categories. In addition, the amount of time used specifically for extravehicular activities (EVAs) is gathered in a tabular form, showing the amount of time by sol and by crewmember that resulted from this analysis. As future analyses related to this surface mission are conducted, these summary results will be updated and revisions of the document will be released.

Mars↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization

This presentation was made at the “COSPAR Planetary Protection Knowledge Gaps for Human Missions to Mars” virtual workshop. As the workshop title implies, the presentation is intended to explain basic features of current human Mars surface mission scenarios being analyzed by NASA. The specific scenario details described is documented in HEOMD-415 “Reference Surface Activities for Crewed Mars Mission Systems and Utilization.” Other workshop presentations will expand on details related to scientific investigations that could have planetary protection impacts.

Mars↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of a Surface Propellant Transportation System Concept for Operations on Mars

NASA is working to define the architecture needed for a Mars exploration campaign. One potential architecture option allows for pre-deployment of essential cargo and equipment to support a crew landing, including the pre-positioning of a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV). This MAV is likely to represent the largest single payload that must be landed on the Martian surface. Its size would be influenced by the amount of mass that state-of-the-art Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) systems would be capable of placing on Mars. One possible method of increasing the usable size of the MAV without exceeding available EDL capabilities is to land the MAV without its ascent propellant on board. Following such a method may necessitate a strategy to acquire sufficient ascent propellant to allow a crew to safely depart the Martian surface. This paper describes a conceptual return propellant strategy that uses a liquid transportation skid, or pallet, to be used in conjunction with a rover mobility system to transfer cryogenic propellant, consisting of oxygen and methane, across the Martian surface from a delivery lander to the MAV to enable its launch. Design considerations, concept of operations, and rover energetics will be discussed in this paper.

Propellant↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Comparative Assessment of Evolvable Martian ISRU Propellant Production for Future Human Missions

In 2022, NASA released its “Moon to Mars Strategy and Objectives Development” document, containing top-level goals and objectives designed to create a blueprint for sustained human presence and exploration throughout the solar system. One objective in this “blueprint” calls for the demonstration of “…Mars ISRU capabilities to support an initial human Mars exploration campaign.” NASA is looking at both the benefits and liens of this concept, as one of several trade space aspects under consideration, for inclusion in the overall architecture of the human exploration of Mars. This paper summarizes results from a series of Martian ISRU-focused trade studies from 2023 and 2024. These studies cover five different approaches to providing propellants for returning crew and equipment from the surface of Mars, using several different combinations of propellants delivered (from Earth) and produced from Martian feedstock material. For comparison purposes, the same ISRU infrastructure elements were used across all options wherever possible. The equipment mass, power, operational complexity, and time needed to produce some or all of these propellants have been quantified and compared when used in a common mission scenario. Analysis results for each option are discussed. Performance parameters for these options are compared side-by-side and observations made, including the positive and negative aspects of each case. The possibility of evolving from a simpler ISRU case to more complex cases that would potentially lead to more sustainable operations are also discussed. While no single case emerged as “better” in all aspects when compared to the others, there are distinct advantages and disadvantages that did emerge when comparing the results generated from a common set of assumptions for all cases. Consequently, specific mission objectives may determine which of these advantages or disadvantages are important for choosing among the cases that could benefit any particular mission or campaign.

Mars↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of a Surface Propellant Transportation System Concept for Operations on Mars

NASA is working to define the architecture needed for a Mars exploration campaign. One potential architecture option allows for pre-deployment of essential cargo and equipment to support a crew landing, including the pre-positioning of a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV). This MAV is likely to represent the largest single payload that must be landed on the Martian surface. Its size would be influenced by the amount of mass that state-of-the-art Entry, Descent, and Landing (EDL) systems would be capable of placing on Mars. One possible method of increasing the usable size of the MAV without exceeding available EDL capabilities is to land the MAV without its ascent propellant on board. Following such a method may necessitate a strategy to acquire sufficient ascent propellant to allow a crew to safely depart the Martian surface. This presentation describes a conceptual return propellant strategy that uses a liquid transportation skid, or pallet, to be used in conjunction with a rover mobility system to transfer cryogenic propellant, consisting of oxygen and methane, across the Martian surface from a delivery lander to the MAV to enable its launch. Design considerations, concept of operations, and rover energetics will be discussed in this presentation.

Surface↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Comparative Assessment of Evolvable Martian ISRU Propellant Production for Future Human Missions

In 2022, NASA released its “Moon to Mars Strategy and Objectives Development” document, containing top-level goals and objectives designed to create a blueprint for sustained human presence and exploration throughout the solar system. One objective in this “blueprint” calls for the demonstration of “…Mars ISRU capabilities to support an initial human Mars exploration campaign.” NASA is looking at both the benefits and liens of this concept, as one of several trade space aspects under consideration, for inclusion in the overall architecture of the human exploration of Mars. This paper summarizes results from a series of Martian ISRU-focused trade studies from 2023 and 2024. These studies cover five different approaches to providing propellants for returning crew and equipment from the surface of Mars, using several different combinations of propellants delivered (from Earth) and produced from Martian feedstock material. For comparison purposes, the same ISRU infrastructure elements were used across all options wherever possible. The equipment mass, power, operational complexity, and time needed to produce some or all of these propellants have been quantified and compared when used in a common mission scenario. Analysis results for each option are discussed. Performance parameters for these options are compared side-by-side and observations made, including the positive and negative aspects of each case. The possibility of evolving from a simpler ISRU case to more complex cases that would potentially lead to more sustainable operations are also discussed. While no single case emerged as “better” in all aspects when compared to the others, there are distinct advantages and disadvantages that did emerge when comparing the results generated from a common set of assumptions for all cases. Consequently, specific mission objectives may determine which of these advantages or disadvantages are important for choosing among the cases that could benefit any particular mission or campaign.

Propellant↗