Stephen Wright | Search NASA

NASA NTRS2024

Airfoil Table Modification for Improved Calculation of Ingenuity Rotor Performance

To better characterize the behavior of the Ingenuity helicopter, multiple test campaigns were conducted. These tests included the Engineering Design Model 1 (EDM1) tests and the Transonic Rotor Test (TRT), both of which assessed Ingenuity rotor performance at various conditions. Using a comprehensive rotorcraft analysis tool, CAMRAD II, test setups of the two different Ingenuity test campaigns were simulated. The EDM1 test used coaxial test stand which focused on varying collective at various feasible Martian atmospheric densities and the TRT test used a single rotor test stand which focused on varying RPM to assess performance at different blade tip Mach numbers. Initial CAMRAD II analyses yielded performance results which differed significantly from experimental results. To reconcile the experimental results and the CAMRAD II analyses, modifications were made to the input airfoil decks for CAMRAD II. After several iterations of modifications, a specific method of modification was found that more accurately predicted experimental behavior at all tested densities for the coaxial rotor. This same modification was less successful for the single rotor test results. There are a number of differences between coaxial and single rotor aerodynamics and between the two test stands (hub and control system); also, there is a small influence of RPM (mainly tip Mach number) on dimensionless performance. These differences may be causing the coaxial rotor modifications not being successful for the single rotor.

Airfoil↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

VTOL Analysis for Emergency Response Applications (VAERA) - Identifying Technology Gaps for Wildfire Relief Rotorcraft Missions

The mission of VAERA (VTOL Analysis for Emergency Response Applications) is to enable the design, development, and analysis of emergency response rotorcraft for different disaster scenarios. The project’s current focus is on improving crewed and uncrewed rotorcraft for wildfire relief efforts. This paper presents background information on the current state of the art for wildfire-fighting crewed and uncrewed rotorcraft, current wildfire operations, handling and flying qualities considerations of similar vehicles, and the limitations of uncrewed sub-1000 lb commercial off the shelf (COTS) rotorcraft that could be (and sometimes are) used for different wildfire missions. Technology gaps that are currently limiting rotorcraft firefighting capabilities are identified using the background information, and a plan of how to address each of the identified technology gaps is presented. In this paper, the key technology gaps identified for rotorcraft in the wildfire environment include: poor performance and handling/flying qualities, inadequate or nonexistent categorization of handling qualities, unvalidated flight dynamics turbulence modeling approaches, and inadequate subsystems for wildfire missions. While numerous concerns for rotorcraft operating in the wildfire environment exist, this paper focuses on those issues that are either not being addressed by others, or that require more attention. The goals of this paper are to both educate the public on critical technology gaps for wildfire-fighting rotorcraft that have not gained significant traction in the public domain, and to explain the work required to address those technology gaps.

VTOL↗