Search NASA⌕ Search

Engineering topics

Stershic, Andrew Joseph

Publications and source records attributed to Stershic, Andrew Joseph.

At least 19 records
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Library of Advanced Materials for Engineering (LAMÉ) 5.22

Accurate and efficient constitutive modeling remains a cornerstone issue for solid mechanics analysis. Over the years, the LAMÉ advanced material model library has grown to address this challenge by implementing models capable of describing material systems spanning soft polymers to stiff ceramics including both isotropic and anisotropic responses. Inelastic behaviors including (visco)plasticity, damage, and fracture have all incorporated for use in various analyses. This multitude of options and flexibility, however, comes at the cost of many capabilities, features, and responses and the ensuing complexity in the resulting implementation. Therefore, to enhance confidence and enable the utilization of the LAMÉ library in application, this effort seeks to document and verify the various models in the LAMÉ library. Specifically, the broader strategy, organization, and interface of the library itself is first presented. The physical theory, numerical implementation, and user guide for a large set of models is then discussed. Importantly, a number of verification tests are performed with each model to not only have confidence in the model itself but also highlight some important response characteristics and features that may be of interest to end-users. Finally, in looking ahead to the future, approaches to add material models to this library and further expand the capabilities are presented.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Library of Advanced Materials for Engineering (LAMÉ) 5.20

Accurate and efficient constitutive modeling remains a cornerstone issue for solid mechanics analysis. Over the years, the LAMÉ advanced material model library has grown to address this challenge by implementing models capable of describing material systems spanning soft polymers to stiff ceramics including both isotropic and anisotropic responses. Inelastic behaviors including (visco)plasticity, damage, and fracture have all incorporated for use in various analyses. This multitude of options and flexibility, however, comes at the cost of many capabilities, features, and responses and the ensuing complexity in the resulting implementation. Therefore, to enhance confidence and enable the utilization of the LAMÉ library in application, this effort seeks to document and verify the various models in the LAMÉ library. Specifically, the broader strategy, organization, and interface of the library itself is first presented. The physical theory, numerical implementation, and user guide for a large set of models is then discussed. Importantly, a number of verification tests are performed with each model to not only have confidence in the model itself but also highlight some important response characteristics and features that may be of interest to end-users. Finally, in looking ahead to the future, approaches to add material models to this library and further expand the capabilities are presented.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2024

Library of Advanced Materials for Engineering (LAMÉ) 5.18

Accurate and efficient constitutive modeling remains a cornerstone issue for solid mechanics analysis. Over the years, the LAMÉ advanced material model library has grown to address this challenge by implementing models capable of describing material systems spanning soft polymers to stiff ceramics including both isotropic and anisotropic responses. Inelastic behaviors including (visco)plasticity, damage, and fracture have all incorporated for use in various analyses. This multitude of options and flexibility, however, comes at the cost of many capabilities, features, and responses and the ensuing complexity in the resulting implementation. Therefore, to enhance confidence and enable the utilization of the LAMÉ library in application, this effort seeks to document and verify the various models in the LAMÉ library. Specifically, the broader strategy, organization, and interface of the library itself is first presented. The physical theory, numerical implementation, and user guide for a large set of models is then discussed. Importantly, a number of verification tests are performed with each model to not only have confidence in the model itself but also highlight some important response characteristics and features that may be of interest to end-users. Finally, in looking ahead to the future, approaches to add material models to this library and further expand the capabilities are presented.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

FY23 Simulation of Elastic-Plastic Failure Propagation

This memo summarizes the simulation of ductile failure propagation work conducted under the ASC project “V&V of Ductile Failure” conducted during FY 23. Physically, the failure propagation consists of crack propagation in the material. In the numerical setting—specifically in a finite element model—propagation can be accomplished through element death when critical conditions occur locally at an element that is then deleted from the simulation. The validation of the finite element models is evaluated by direct comparison between the experimental and simulation results regarding the rate of crack growth and its influence on the load-deflection response of the specimens tested. This work considers two geometries that display stable crack propagation under displacement-controlled conditions. The first geometry consists of hat specimens loaded in compression with nominally identical geometries but made with three different materials: Steel A286, Al 7075-T651 and 304L stainless steel. The three materials represent a range of ductility values that affect the response and crack propagation within the specimen. The crack induced propagates under an essentially mode-II type of deformation. The second geometry consists of a pre-cracked 304L stainless steel compact tension test specimen loaded so as to induce a mode-I deformation at the crack.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Simulation Analysis of Geometry and Material Effects for Dropkinson Bar

The reported research is motivated by the need to address a key issue affecting the Dropkinson bar apparatus. This unresolved issue is the interference of the stress wave reflected from the bar-beam boundary with the measurement of the stress-strain response of a material tested in the apparatus. The purpose of the wave beam that is currently connected to the bar is to dissipate the stress wave, but the portion of the wave reflected from the bar-beam boundary is still significant. First, we focused on understanding which parameters affect the reflected wave's arrival time at a strain gauge. Specifically, we used finite-element numerical simulations with the Sierra/SM module to study the effects of various bar-beam connection fixities, alternative wave beam materials, and alternative geometries of the Dropkinson bar system based on a monolithic design. The conclusion of this study is that a partial reflection always occurs at the bar-beam boundary (or, for a monolithic design, at a point where the bar geometry changes). Therefore, given a fixed total length of the bar, it is impossible to increase the reflected wave's arrival time by any significant amount. After reaching this conclusion, we focused instead on trying to minimize the energy of the reflected stress wave circulating up and down through the bar over a relatively long period of time (10 ms). Once again, we used numerical simulations with the Sierra/SM module to investigate the effects of various bar-beam connection fixities, alternative wave beam materials, and parameters of an asymmetric monolithic design of the bar-and-beam system. This study demonstrated that various parameters can significantly affect the energy of the wave reflections, with the difference between best and worst configurations being about one order of magnitude in terms of energy. Based on the obtained results, we conclude with concrete takeaways for Dropkinson bar users and propose potential directions for future research and optimization.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗